NAMBUCCA SHIRE COUNCIL
Ordinary
Council Meeting - 16 October 2008
AGENDA Page
1 APOLOGIES
2 PRAYER
3 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
4 CONFIRMATION
OF MINUTES —
(i) Special Meeting of Ordinary Council - 2 October 2008
(ii) Ordinary Council Meeting - 2 October 2008
5.1 Notice of Motion -
Riverbank Erosion -
5.2 Notice of Motion -
6 DELEGATIONS—Motion to
hear Delegations
9.3 Future
of Argents Hill Hall
(i) Leanne Davidson—concerned resident
(ii) Barry Tasker—concerned resident
9.9 Outcome
of Public Meeting Concerning Proposed Telecommunications Facility for Optus
Mobile Pty Ltd - Wallace Street Reservoir, Macksville
(i) Mark Collister on behalf of OPTUS
10.2 Report
for Determination of DA 2008/181 - Detached Dual Occupancy -
(i) Mr Malcolm Gresswell—concerned resident
7 ASKING OF QUESTIONS WITH
NOTICE
8 QUESTIONS FOR CLOSED
MEETING WHERE DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED
9.1 Outstanding
Actions and Reports
9.2 Request
for a Designated "Clothes Optional" Beach for the Purpose of Nude
Swimming and Related Social Activities
9.3 Future
of Argents Hill Hall—DELEGATION
9.4 Annual
General Meeting - Argents Hill Hall Committee of Management
9.5 Annual
General Meeting - Missabotti Hall Committee of Management
9.6 Annual
General Meeting - Crosswinds Nature Reserve
9.7
9.8 Report
on the provision of toilets at the Macksville saleyards
9.9 Outcome
of Public Meeting Concerning Proposed Telecommunications Facility for Optus
Mobile Pty Ltd - Wallace Street Reservoir, Macksville--DELEGATION
9.10 Financial
Reports - 30 June 2008
9.11 Grant
Application Status Report - October 2008
9.12 Withdrawal
of Caveat over Lots 14-22 DP
9.13 Continuance
of Lease to Ussher Over Future Dam Site Land
9.14 Cr
Martin Ballangarry OAM - Request for Leave - 9 to 17 October 2008
10 Director
Environment and Planning Report
10.1 Outstanding
Development applications more than 12 months old and applications where
submissions have been received and not determined to 2 October 2008
10.2 Report
for Determination of DA 2008/181 - Detached Dual Occupancy -
10.3 Public
Hearing for Reclassification of
10.4 Contract
Regulatory Officer's Report - September 2008
11 Director Engineering Services Report
11.2 Professional
Lifeguard Services 2007/2008 Contract Report
11.5 Rural
Fire Service - Annual Budget 2009/2010
11.6 Zone Liaison Committee (Rural Fire Service) - Council's Representative
12 GENERAL PURPOSE
Committee 15 October 2008 - REPORT
12.1 Councillors Induction - Tour of Facilities
12.2 40
Rural-Residential
12.3 Section
94 Developer Contributions - Community Facilities and Open Space Contribution
Plan 2008
12.4 Procurement
Policies and Procedures - Resubmitted
13 General Manager's Summary of Items to be
Discussed in Closed Meeting
13.1 Update
on matters concerning the
It is recommended
that the Council resolve into closed session with the press and public excluded
to allow consideration of this item, as provided for under Section 10A(2) (d)
of the Local Government Act, 1993, on the grounds that the report contains
commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i)
prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer
a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade
secret.
14 MEETING CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC
15 REVERT TO OPEN MEETING FOR DECISIONS IN RELATION TO ITEMS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED MEETING.
|
16
October 2008 |
Notice of Motion
ITEM 5.1 RF256 161008 Notice of
Motion - Riverbank Erosion -
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Paula Flack,
Councillor
|
Summary: Due to past
heavy rainfall events several cement sandbags have washed out of the
riverbank immediately underneath the old footpath along Riverside Drive,
leaving the footpath ‘floating’ without any solid base in one section. This can be
clearly seen from approximately halfway along the new boardwalk. Temporary
measurers have been taken to hold up the footpath with timber bracing,
however the footpath and public safety are at risk and action should be taken
to address this potentially dangerous situation as soon possible. Timely attention
to this issue will also minimise the risk of further erosion in the upcoming
wet season which could result in loss of a section of the footpath and pose a
threat to the stability of |
|
That, to ensure
public safety, appropriate work be undertaken immediately to repair the bank
below the old footpath along Riverside Drive where the base has been eroded
away. |
MANEX
COMMENT
This footpath is superseded by the boardwalk
and has not been closed yet as Engineering staff have been assessing the best
way to provide lighting on the boardwalk for safer night use.
A trial of solar bollards is about to
commence.
It is recommended that the temporary bracing
remain in place until after this trial as the old footpath may be formally
closed.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16 October
2008 |
Notice of Motion
ITEM 5.2 SF382 161008 Notice of
Motion -
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Paula Flack,
Councillor
|
Summary: On 2 November
2006, Council endorsed the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the
Department of Lands regarding the preparation of a Masterplan for the The MOU was
apparently signed off on the 12 February 2007 and consultants were engaged
sometime after that to undertake the preparation of the Masterplan, however,
Council has never received a report or update on the project. The Masterplan
consultants held a public meeting on Thursday 11 September at Scotts Head, to
brief the community and seek feedback on various options but Councillors were
only informed of the workshop at very short notice and not all were able to
attend. The lack of
communication regarding this important process leaves Councillors, in
particular new Councillors, lacking vital information. As a result, they are unable to discuss
issues with members of the public who may seek their advice or comments
regarding the Masterplan and the future of the This
unacceptable situation requires addressing as soon as possible. |
|
1 That Council receives a
comprehensive report regarding the preparation of the Masterplan—at the very
least, the report should cover the project timeline, progress to date and
budget details. 2 That Council invite the Masterplan
consultants to present the draft Masterplan to a General Purpose Committee
meeting before it is placed on exhibition. |
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16 October 2008 |
General Manager's
Report
ITEM 9.1 SF1111 161008 Outstanding
Actions and Reports
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
|
Summary: The following table is a report on all outstanding resolutions
and questions from Councillors (except development consents, development
control plans & local environmental plans). Matters which are simply noted or received,
together with resolutions adopting rates, fees and charges are not listed as
outstanding actions. Where matters have
been actioned they are indicated with |
|
That the list of outstanding
actions and reports be noted and received for information by Council. |
|
|
FILE NO. |
COUNCIL MEETING |
SUMMARY OF MATTER |
ACTION BY |
STATUS |
|||
|
MARCH
2007 |
||||||||
|
1 |
QWN19 |
01/03/07 |
Floodgates Gumma |
DES |
Revised to end of Nov 08 |
|||
|
SEPTEMBER
2007 |
||||||||
|
2 |
SF428 |
20/09/07 |
That Council vigorously pursue
the exclusion of the Farmland Mapping from those areas already identified for
rural residential development that are already fragmented or removed from
primary production. All affected
property owners within the quota zoning to be directly notified. |
DEP |
Department of Planning advised by letter
12/10 that all previous 1(C) zoned land and land not identified as Class 1, 2
or 3 Draft RRS now on exhibition, with
submissions being considered. Met with DoP 20/5 to further discuss Rural
Residential & Farmland Mapping. Working towards a resolution. |
|||
|
DECEMBER 2007 |
||||||||
|
3 |
SF639 |
06/12/07 |
That the skill levels of
Council’s outdoor workforce be the subject of a further report. |
MHR |
By December 2008 |
|||
|
4 |
SF791 |
06/12/07 |
Council apply to Minister and
Governor to compulsorarily acquire certain lands from State Forests NSW
following advice on a deed of agreement. |
GM |
Minister and Governor have now approved
compulsory acquisition via land swap.
Acquisition to be confirmed in Government Gazette in 90 days on 24
October 2008. |
|||
|
MARCH 2008 |
||||||||
|
5 |
6298/2008 |
20/3/08 |
Councillors be advised of
potential contamination penalties which might be payable to Handybin for the
Coffs Coast Waste Service. |
DES |
Working Party is developing an approach
whereby the penalty increases with the level of contamination. |
|||
|
APRIL 2008 |
||||||||
|
6 |
SF744 |
17/04/08 |
Rehabilitation Bonds Mac’scon
– that Council again write to the Dept of Water & Energy giving them 30
days to concur with release of 2 bonds |
DEP |
Letter received from DWE and forwarded to
Mac’scon. Met with applicant’s consultant 22/5. Currently working through DWE issues. Follow up letter sent to Mac’scon 30/9/08 |
|||
|
7 |
SF699 |
17/4/08 |
A report be brought forward on
assessing the best arrangement for Town Services in subsequent years. |
DES |
Report December 2008. |
|||
|
MAY 2008 |
||||||||
|
8 |
QWN 103 |
15/05/08 |
Enviro Saver Program – further
investigations |
DEP |
Onsite inspection and assessment for the
retrofitting and installation arranged for late August/September 2008. Rescheduled for Oct/Nov. |
|||
|
9 |
QWN 109 |
15/05/08 |
Road maintenance— |
DES |
Rehab pavement in October. Work commenced |
|||
|
10 |
QWN 111 |
15/05/08 |
Second Hand Shop at
Newville—water coming off street into storage shed |
DES |
|
|||
|
11 |
QWN 112 |
15/05/08 |
|
DES |
Revisit in Spring for lantana & other
vegetation growth. Programmed for October. Specific herbicide required for lantana in
February. |
|||
|
12 |
QWN 113 |
15/05/08 |
Stormwater Drainage—Macksville
Industrial Estate – easement required? |
DES |
Solicitor to finalise. |
|||
|
13 |
SF35 |
15/5/08 |
That as a 6 month trial,
Council amend the GM’s delegations so as to provide authority for functions
under Part 4 of the EPA Act except where objections have been received and
the application is “called in” by any Councillor. |
DEP |
Review to occur in December 2008. |
|||
|
JUNE 2008 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report to Council 16/10 |
|||
|
15 |
SF357 |
05/06/08 |
NoM – That Council investigate
the establishment of a district map on the western wall of the pool complex
as public art and apply funds set aside for the tourist office. |
GM |
Grant application made under Regional Arts
Fund. |
|||
|
16 |
SF793 |
05/06/08 |
NoM - Council write to the
appropriate department and request a total ban on night netting on all
Nambucca Shire Council beaches. |
DES |
Report on commercial fishermen to be
prepared for Council after further consulting with the Department of Primary
Industries. |
|||
|
17 |
SF755 |
05/06/08 |
GM or DES consult with Depot
staff in relation to carrying out maintenance for the Rural Fire Service
fleet. |
DES |
Contractor engaged. |
|||
|
18 |
SF844 |
19/06/08 |
Council send a delegation to
the Minister for Water and Energy, the Hon. Nathan Rees to request
confirmation of the Department’s subsidy for the Off River Storage Project. |
GM |
Letter sent 9/07/08. Letter written to Andrew Stoner MP on
24/09/08 seeking a follow-up. |
|||
|
19 |
QWN 139 |
19/06/08 |
Status of $120,000 public art
entry statements to Nambucca Heads |
GM |
Advice being sought from Nambucca Heads
Chamber of Commerce. Matter discussed
with a Chamber rep on 28/8/08 who advised they are actively seeking grants
and Council’s funds will be applied to the entry statements. |
|||
|
JULY 2008 |
||||||||
|
20 |
QWN 150 |
03/07/08 |
Wash-away near Allan Proctor’s
property on Rhones Creek |
DES |
To be assessed. |
|||
|
21 |
QWN 152 |
03/07/08 |
Reconstruction of |
DES |
Programmed for October/November 2008. Contractor engaged. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
23 |
Item 9.4 |
03/07/08 |
Bowraville Theatre – amended
budget report |
GM |
Letter sent 10/07/08. |
|||
|
24 |
Item 9.9 |
03/07/08 |
Council make representation to
Minister for Lands seeking agreed compensation for subdivision of Reserve
91694 |
GM |
Letter sent 15/07/08. |
|||
|
25 |
Item 9.1 |
03/07/08 |
Council form working party to
resolve conflicting issues surrounding the use of footpaths |
DEP |
Working party meeting to be arranged
August/September. To be deferred to
after elections. Arrangements being made to hold meeting. |
|||
|
26 |
Item 11.4 |
03/07/08 |
That a new plan of management
be prepare for Faringdon Playing Fields |
DES |
Awaiting outcome of grant application. |
|||
|
27 |
QWN 166 |
17/07/08 |
Road Base Repairs – Taylors
Arm road near |
DES |
Listed. |
|||
|
28 |
SF360 |
17/07/08 |
Plan & costings be prepared
for the Argents Hill hall – smaller replacement building –v- repairing
existing hall. |
DES |
Meeting with CoM to ascertain their
requirements. GM and Assets Officer
met with 2 reps of CoM and Cr Flack on 8 August. Report to 16 October on options for demolition,
repair, replace & hand over. |
|||
|
29 |
RF386 |
17/07/08 |
Council seek legal advice
regarding withdrawing our interest from the rights of carriageway ( |
DES |
Advised from Land Titles referred to
Solicitor for comment. No progress. |
|||
|
30 |
SF42 |
17/07/08 |
Revised Model Code of Conduct
– seek co-operation of adjoining Councils to establish single conduct review
committee – invite Mr Terry Perkins to participate – direction attention of
staff to new Code – letter to all Committees of Management. |
GM |
Adjoining Councils notified. Letter sent to Terry Perkins. Remainder underway. |
|||
|
31 |
SF908 |
17/07/08 |
Request Minister for Planning
for direction on a planning standard for sea level rise. |
GM |
Letter sent to Minister Sartor on
23/07/08. |
|||
|
32 |
SF283 |
17/07/08 |
List of areas in Council
administration centre requiring work to ensure compliance with relevant
standard for access for people with disabilities be referred to Council’s
technical officers for assessment and if necessary a report be prepared for
Council or the Access Committee. |
DES |
Audit to be undertaken by a Building
Inspector and Community Manager. |
|||
|
33 |
LF3891 |
17/07/08 |
Access to timber mill –
Nambucca Heads. Council retrieve any
reports and resolutions in relation to the entry to the timber mill and
determine who is responsible for the maintenance of the drain at the entrance
gate. |
DES |
Report to November 2008 Council Meeting. |
|||
|
34 |
SF679 |
17/07/08 |
Waste Depot - Council tender
for the weighbridge, gatehouse and associated infrastructure with the
exception of road approaches which are to be undertaken by Council. There be a further report to Council on the
outcome of the tenders and a detailed costing of the roadworks. |
DES |
Advertised 8/10, closes 5/11. |
|||
|
AUGUST 2008 |
||||||||
|
35 |
QWN 172 |
07/08/08 |
Developers Refund (G & Y
Wood) Scotts Head |
DEP |
Seven day final courtesy letter send 26
August. No response—application to be refused. |
|||
|
36 |
QWN 173 |
07/08/08 |
How much stone moved from
quarry to Valla |
DES |
To be determined for flood damage job at |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
38 |
NoM |
07/08/08 |
Council seek quotations from
landscape designers to prepare, in consultation with Joan’s Army, a landscaping
Masterplan for riverfront from the Bridge to the public toilets. |
DES |
Report November 2008 |
|||
|
39 |
QWN 169 |
07/08/08 |
Donnelly Welsh Playing Fields
– Illegal Clearing – Council receive a report on the outcome of the referral
to the DECC and NRCMA. |
DEP |
Letter sent 17/09/08. Response from NRCMA 29/9/08 advising that
DECC are responsible for compliance.
No response yet from DECC. |
|||
|
40 |
SF276 |
07/08/08 |
A report come back to Council
on an amended Workplace Equity and Diversity Strategy which includes the
designation of at least 2 positions for Aboriginal employment subject to the
candidate being a suitable candidate. |
GM |
Report November 2008 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
42 |
QWN 183 |
21/08/08 |
|
DES |
Settlement listed for levelling with
street rehabilitation. |
|||
|
43 |
QWN 188 |
21/08/08 |
Dead trees to be removed at
Peter Trisley’s and at the gravel dump on Valla road |
DES |
Listed. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
45 |
QWN 194 |
21/08/08 |
Cleanup roadsides at
Bowraville – request from Lions Club |
DES |
Draft agreement prepared. Council’s
insurers to review. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
47 |
QWN 196 DA 2006/143 |
21/08/08 |
Who authorised deletion of
conditions for Who authorised deletion of
requirement for ecologist to check for koalas |
DEP |
As part of the revised lot layout and with
more accurate survey information it was identified that the permit may not be
required as the development was further than 40m from the bank of Deep Creek. The MBD sought to remove the requirement
of an ecologist to some other qualified person and was advised that this
could only be considered through a modification. Modified Application to come to Council
for final authorisation. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
49 |
SF1031 |
27/08/08 |
Defer review of Environment
and Planning Department Policies to new Council |
DEP |
November 2008 |
|||
|
50 |
DA2006/056 |
27/08/08 |
Council received a report on
the standard width for cycleways and its implications for DCP 17. |
DES |
November 2008 |
|||
|
SEPTEMBER 2008 |
||||||||
|
51 |
QWN 197 |
04/09/08 |
Burn off maps to Council’s
website |
DEP |
Maps to be available on website during
October |
|||
|
52 |
QWN 202 |
04/09/08 |
Alberta St—stormwater
rehabilitation driveway at eastern end to be rebuilt |
DES |
March 2009 |
|||
|
53 |
QWN 198 |
04/09/08 |
Prevention of cane toad
infestation |
DEP |
Letter sent 8/09/08. DPI advised 22/9/08 that matter has been
referred to its Armidale office for reply. |
|||
|
54 |
QWN 199 |
04/09/08 |
Legal advice regarding right
of carriageway on Gaddes’ property, Rhones Creek |
DES |
Still awaiting legal advice. |
|||
|
55 |
SF261 Item 9.1 |
04/09/08 |
Council write to the RTA re
process they will be adopting in advising persons about the proposed highway
upgrade |
DEP |
Letter sent 16/9/08. Response received 2/10 – copy attached. |
|||
|
OCTOBER 2008 |
||||||||
|
56 |
QWN 204 |
02/10/08 |
Copy of final Structure Plan
provided to Councillors |
DEP |
A copy of the Structure
Plan is available on Council's website in sections for easier downloading,
however a hard copy of the document can be made available to any interested
Councillors |
|||
|
57 |
QWN 205 |
02/10/08 |
High voltage sign removed from
boardwalk at Riverside |
DES |
Sign to be relocated to riverside of
boardwalk. |
|||
|
58 |
QWN 206 |
02/10/08 |
Report to Council for
resolution in order to retain development application statistics in business
paper |
DEP |
Report to be prepared for
November Council meeting |
|||
|
59 |
QWN 207 |
02/10/08 |
Section 94 Contribution
Planner’s next meeting with Council |
GM |
Mr Potts has been invited to attend the
General Purpose meeting 15/10 but has a prior commitment to Bellingen Shire
Council. Report will be presented on 15/10/08. |
|||
|
1View |
2472/2008 - Advice of information as to how the
RTA responds to Property Information Inquiries relating to the |
|

|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.2 SF1222 161008 Request
for a Designated "Clothes Optional" Beach for the Purpose of Nude
Swimming and Related Social Activities
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
|
Summary: Council has received a request from the
Nambucca Valley Nudist Group to designate a section of beach at The Local Government Act 1993 enables
Council to designate a beach or a section of beach for the purposes of nude
bathing. It is proposed that Council refer the
request to its Valla Beach Urban and Hall Management Committee for
comment. It is a Section 355 Committee
of Council charged with consulting the local community and to developing
initiatives for the betterment of that community. Given perceptions associated with nude
beaches attracting perverts and associated crime it is proposed that Council
also seek the views of the NSW Police Force to the proposal. |
|
1 That Council refer the request by the
Nambucca Valley Nudist Group to the 2 That Council seek the views of the NSW
Police Force in relation to the request and in particular the relationship, if any, between declared
nudist beaches and crime. |
OPTIONS:
Council has a range of
options from not supporting the request; to undertaking consultation and
investigation or supporting the request. It is recommended that Council undertake
consultation with the residents of
DISCUSSION:
Council has received a
request from the Nambucca Valley Nudist Group to have a section of a beach
under the control of the Nambucca Shire Council designated clothes optional for
the purpose of nude swimming and other related social activities.
According to the
information provided, the Nambucca Valley Nudist Group is a group of
approximately 20 local residents who meet regularly under the auspices of the
Australian Nudist Federation’s (ANF) Supporter Club. The aim of the group is to meet regularly in
a safe family orientated environment and enjoy the health and leisure benefits
of the nudist lifestyle.
The area of beach
proposed to be used is about 100m south of the entrance to Deep Creek and is
approximately 300m long.
A detailed submission
and plan showing the location of the beach area is attached.
The legislation
concerning nude or “clothes optional” bathing is set out in the Local
Government Act 1993.
633 Bathing (including nude
bathing) and other water-based recreational activities
(1) A person who, in a place being:
(a) a public
bathing place under the control of a council, or
(b) a river,
watercourse or tidal or non-tidal water, or
(c) the sea
adjacent to (although outside) an area, or
(d) a public
place adjacent to any of those places,
fails to comply with
the terms of a notice erected by the council is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: 10
penalty units.
(2) A person who is in public
view in the nude in any place (other than a designated beach) referred to in
subsection (1) is guilty of an offence unless a notice erected by the council
at the place allows the use of the place (or part of the place) for the
purposes of nude bathing.
Maximum penalty: 10
penalty units.
Council has established
the Valla Beach Urban and Hall Management Committee under Section 355 of the
Local Government Act for the purposes of amongst other things:
* to endeavour to make
* to promote and foster such
activities which will be of benefit to all age groups.
It is an active
Committee which works to foster consultation with the
CONSULTATION:
It is proposed that
there be consultation with the Valla Beach Urban & Hall Management
Committee which has a broad role in fostering community activities in the
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no implications for the environment.
Social
The social implications will depend upon how
the proposal is received by the community.
Economic
There are no significant economic
implications. The background material
indicates that there may be some positive tourist outcomes if the proposal were
to proceed.
Risk
The proposal canvasses some of the perceived
drawbacks with clothes optional beaches.
It is acknowledged that there are perceptions that nude beaches attract
voyeurs or perverts but there is no data available to support or refute such
perceptions. For this reason it is
proposed to seek comment from the local police.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
There are no budgetary implications.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There is no impact on working funds.
|
1View |
23358/2008 - Request to make part of |
|












|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.3 SF360 161008 Future of
Argents Hill Hall
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
|
Summary: In
July 2008 the Argents Hill Hall was closed as it was deemed unsafe. At Council’s meeting on 8 July 2008 it was
resolved to investigate the cost of a replacement Hall –v- the cost of
repairing the existing Hall and that the decision to demolish the Hall be
deferred for six months. A
cost estimate has been prepared for both repairing the existing Hall and for
providing a replacement building.
Because of the slope of the land a new site would need to be acquired
which has not been included in the cost estimates. Taking into account the cost of demolishing
the Hall and acquiring a new site the cost of repair or replacement are likely
to be of a similar order. Council
does not have and will not have the financial resources to retain relatively
high maintenance and low use buildings such as the Argents Hill Hall. It has no reserves available and besides
the Argents Hill Hall has substantial funding requirements for better
utilised facilities. However
the Hall’s Committee of Management is keen to retain the building for use by
the Argent’s Hill community. In
principle there is no objection to the application of funding which would
have been required for demolition towards the cost of the building’s repair
provided the Department of Lands is agreeable to transferring trusteeship
from Council to a trust managed by the local community. If the community, assisted by Council, is
able to garner some grant funding then the wishes of the community and the
financial imperatives of Council could be satisfactorily resolved. The building would no longer be a liability
for Council and repairs could be effected that would ensure its future for at
least the medium term. |
|
1 That Council offer
$40,000 towards the cost of repairing the Argents Hill Hall conditional upon
the Department of Lands agreeing to transfer trusteeship from Council to a
trust managed by either an incorporated association or a community Trust Board
and having an incorporated association or community Trust Board willing to
accept that responsibility. 2 That this resolution and
report be conveyed to the Argents Hill Hall Committee of Management and to
the Department of Lands. |
OPTIONS:
In relation to the
recommendation there are options in relation to the quantum of the offer
towards the cost of repair. The proposed
$40,000 is more than the cost which would be incurred by Council if it were to
demolish the Hall. It is also a
substantial sum which should assist in attracting supporting grant funding from
other levels of government and the private sector.
Council could also
resolve to seek the concurrence of the Department of Lands to demolish the
Hall.
Alternatively Council
could retain its trusteeship in which case there will be an on-going
expectation from the Argents Hill community that Council will meet the costs of
repair regardless of the available grant funding. This option is not recommended as Council
does not have and will not have the financial resources to retain all of its
public buildings and must look to rationalise its stock of public buildings and
Halls and particularly those with high maintenance and relatively low usage and
where satisfactory alternatives exist.
DISCUSSION:
The Argents Hill Hall is
located on
The condition of the
Argents Hill Hall has been the subject of a number of reports to Council over
many years.
On 2 October 2003,
Council resolved as follows:
“That
the Committees of Management for Warrell Creek Hall, Argents Hill Hall,
Burrapine Hall and Missabotti Community Centre all be advised of the work
required to be carried out immediately and essential as a place of public
entertainment, in order to keep the various premises open as Halls/places of
public entertainment, pointing out that Council is looking to the Committees to
undertake these works as Council cannot justify the expenditure involved, given
the poor usage record in each case and further pointing out that if these
essential works are not attended to then Council will have no alternative other
than to close the respective Halls down”.
On 21 June 2007, in a major
report to Council on all of its community Halls and buildings, the Director
Corporate Services reported as follows:
“Condition of the Hall
The photographs highlight the very dilapidated external condition of the
Hall. The external cladding needs to be
re-nailed and defective cladding repaired or replaced. The windows and doors need replacing. The Hall needs an annual termite inspection.
The Hall was storm damaged in 1978 and significant water damage occurred
to the ceiling and floor. There is no
disabled toilet. The exits are not
evenly distributed throughout the building and there are no thresholds at the
exits. The main Hall is not fire
separated from the remainder of the building.
The main switchboard is not in the correct location.
The building contains asbestos that has minor cracks and holes.
The Hall is not licenced as a POPE.
The potential licence capacity is 125 people.
Capital Expenditure
The following major costs were identified in 2004.
· Ceiling and
internal walls $2,500
· Windows and
architraves $4,000
· External cladding $2,000
· Painting
external/internal $13,000
· Access and
thresholds $1,000
· Unisex disabled WC $15,000
TOTAL $37,500
An assessment of the electrical circuits has not been completed and the
costs of fire separation of the main Hall and relocation of the exits are not
included in the above amount.
Operating Costs
The Committee’s financial activities for July 2006 to May 2007 are
expenditure of $310.95 and income of $188.00.
The Committee has a bank balance of $1,100 as at 31 May 2007.
Council has spent $1,568.00 in maintenance and repair during
2006/2007. The Hall is not on Council’s
property schedule (for insurance).
Community Benefit
The Hall is currently used by the community for a Christmas party each
year attended by up to 100 people. The
Hall is hired once or twice a year for private functions such as a birthday
party.
The Committee currently holds fortnightly carpet bowls on a Friday night
during the summer attended by up to 10 people.
Carpet bowls are also held once during each school holiday period and
can be attended by up to 20 people.
The Hall is not licenced as a Place of Public Entertainment (POPE). The majority of the capital works would have
to be completed to be issued with a licence.
The Hall is unviable in its present condition and based on current and
past usage, there is no justification to undertake the $40,000 to $50,000 of
capital works to enable the issue of a POPE.
There is no possibility of the Hall being able to financially contribute
to the capital works.
Future of the Hall
The land and building are worthless having no residential building
entitlement.
The sale and relocation of the building may be possible, however the
condition of the building and OH&S issues would need to be assessed.
The use of the Hall has fluctuated over the years and greatly depends on
the enthusiasm of one or two members of the community. There have been years when the Hall was only
used once a year and some years never used.
The current committee is encouraging use of the Hall however the
involvement of the community is cyclical.
The Hall is not a licenced POPE.
The Hall has not been utilized to the extent that the closure of the
Hall will have a significant impact on the community of Argents Hill. The Hall is 13 kilometres from Bowraville.
At that meeting on 21
June 2007 it was recommended that Council close Argents Hill Hall and call
tenders for the purchase and removal of the building. However Council resolved:
“To
defer closures of any Halls for twelve months to allow the Committees of
Management to consider their long term financial sustainability”.
Council also resolved to
offer guidance and support to Committee’s regarding grant applications and
determine accurate costings to complete the capital works needed for each
facility.
The General Manager
attended the Annual General Meeting of the Argents Hill Hall Committee of
Management on 27 August 2007 and advised that of the appointment of a Grants
Officer to assist the Hall committee and that, “the Halls can help their cause by undertaking independent fund raising
activities, both at a local level, and by applying for grants”.
Following an inspection
of the Hall by Council’s new Technical Officer for Assets on 8 July 2008 there
was a report to Council’s meeting on 17 July 2008.
The report noted the
outcome of the inspection on 8 July 2008 and the key deficiencies as:
· Ceiling and wall
linings contained chrysotile asbestos and are not encapsulated over the kitchen
door, on the wall at the western end of the Hall, at the ceiling lining joints
where they have sagged and exposed raw edges, in the room behind the stage
where there is no lining on the back of the wall leaving the back of the
asbestos sheets exposed.
· An old 5 gang
light switch made from bakelite has two broken switches which has exposed the
terminals. It was not able to be
determined whether they were alive or not but the wires were still fastened in
the terminals. The President of the Hall
Committee of Management was spoken to on the day and he advised that he would
barricade the switches immediately.
· The ceiling lining
in the centre of the Hall has come away from the roof timbers approximately
200mm with the real possibility for this lining to collapse.
· The double power
point in the kitchen is loose on the wall.
· There are many
electrical concerns and an electrical audit would be needed.
· The Hall is still
being hired out for functions and does not have a POPE licence and the
emergency lighting is non compliant.
· Two piers under
the stage are missing leaving two bearers unsupported. It is possible that with a live load on the
stage it could collapse.
· The rear section
of the building has sunk considerably which is pulling the building apart. Internal doors now do not shut.
· A considerable
amount of rot has occurred in many of the timber elements of the building
including bearers, joists, timber cladding, windows, doors, door jambs, wall
studs, facia boards, barge boards, architraves and other mouldings.
The cost of repairing and upgrading the Hall will be high and is not
considered to be a realistic option. A
basic replacement building is the only option to not replacing the Hall. This would be subject to obtaining funding
through grants and Council’s revenues.
The issue to be addressed immediately is to secure the building so that
no one is exposed to the asbestos or the unstable nature of the building.
The course of action adopted has been to close the Hall and secure it to
prevent use. Seeking quotations on
demolition will follow.
It was recommended that Council note the closure of the Hall; that a
plan and costing be prepared to provide a smaller replacement building
constructed of steel and colourbond clad with a kitchen and amenities with a
view to applying for a grant; that Council note that the unsafe condition of
the building has been reported to Council’s insurers due to the public
liability exposure; and that Council proceed to demolish the building after
obtaining at least 2 quotations.
In relation to the
report, Council resolved as follows:
1 That Council note that the
Argents Hill Hall has been closed.
2 That
a plan and costings be prepared to provide a smaller replacement building
constructed of steel and colourbond clad with a kitchen and amenities with a
view to applying for a grant and a plan and costing for repairing the existing
Hall also be prepared for comparison.
3 That
Council note that the unsafe condition of the building has been reported to
Council’s insurers due to the public liability exposure.
4 That
the decision to demolish the Hall be deferred for six months and that the plans
and costings be prepared for comparison purposes for firstly replacing the Hall
with another building and secondly, for restoring the existing Hall.
That
the notice on the door of the Hall be replaced, removing reference to demolition
and advising of the process which is to be followed.”
Since the resolution on
8 July 2008 there has been further consultation with representatives of the
Committee of Management and the Department of Lands.
Representatives of the
Committee of Management have expressed a strong preference for the retention of
the existing Hall rather than a replacement building.
The Department of Lands
have advised that Council would need to consult with them in relation to any
proposal to demolish the building or any change to the trustee arrangements.
Costing for repairing
the existing Hall
Council resolved that a
costing for repairing the existing Hall be prepared.
This has been undertaken
to the best of the ability of the Technical Officer – Assets. Given the nature, age and condition of the
building it is impossible to provide an accurate costing as the condition of
much of the building’s structural elements will only be revealed when cladding
is removed. There is a real possibility
that additional structural repairs will be required once rotten cladding is
removed.
The schedule of the
indicative costs for repair is as follows:
New kitchen $20,000
Disability access $5,000
Replace rotten weather
boards on northern wall $500
Replace rotten timber
windows on northern wall $2,000
Replace stairs and hand
rail on northern wall $1,200
Replace broken light on
northern wall $100
Replace rotten timber on
southern wall $2,500
Replace rotten door on
southern wall $250
Replace rotten timber
window on southern wall $700
Replace rotten verandah
decking on southern wall $200
Replace rotten handrail
on southern wall $250
Replace rotten timber on
eastern wall $1,000
Replace rotten fascia on
eastern wall $400
Replace rotten windows
and broken glass on eastern wall $1,200
Stabilise western wall
(has considerable movement through rot in studs) $4,500
Replace rotten closing
strip on door on western wall $100
Whole building should be
renailed and corroded fasteners replaced $10,000
Install ladder brackets
to roof $300
Install roof anchor
points $2,500
Replace corroded
plumbing $1,000
Reinstate footings $5,000
Replace piers $3,500
Replace rotten bearers $2,500
Lift and fix sagging
ceiling $5,000
Electrical tagging $300
Rewiring building $5,000
Install smoke detectors $1,000
Replace broken
earthenware outlet pipe to septic $200
Internal painting
(considerable preparation) $15,000
External painting
(considerable preparation) $20,000
Floor resealing $3,000
Construct unisex
disability toilet $15,000
TOTAL $129,200
Costing for
9m x 12m shed delivered $14,000
Erection of shed $6,000
Concrete slab $10,000
Kitchen $10,000
Toilets with plumbing
and septic (1 male, 1 female, 1 disability) $20,000
Breakout doors $5,000
Lighting and electrical
including connection $5,000
Exit lights and
evacuation plans $2,000
Fire extinguishers $1,000
Partition walls and
general carpentry $5,000
Carpark and disability
access $7,000
TOTAL $85,000
The slope of the
existing site is such that a replacement building would best be located on
other land. The acquisition cost of an
alternative site has not been estimated.
Costing for Demolition
of the Existing Hall
The option for a
replacement building would also need to consider the cost of demolition of the
existing Hall. Because of the size of
the structure and its asbestos linings, the demolition costs are not
insignificant. A quote of $33,500 has
been obtained for the purposes of quantifying the cost of demolition.
Proposal for Future of
Hall
Council needs to
consider the funding requirements for the repair or replacement of the Argents
Hill Hall in the context of other Halls and buildings in its ownership which
are likely to incur significant costs within the foreseeable future. It should be noted that Council has no
reserves for the repair or replacement of such buildings nor has Council
sufficient working funds to carry the cost of such works. The Pioneer Community Centre and the major
amenities block at Coronation Oval are two facilities which have more use than
the Argents Hill Hall and which will require major expenditure in the
foreseeable future.
Consistent with
Council’s resolution in June 2007, contact has been made with the Secretary of
the Hall Committee with a view to providing the Committee with assistance in
preparing grant applications for funding under the Area Assistance Scheme; the
Helping Hands Grants Scheme and the Department of Lands Public Reserve
Management Fund.
It is proposed that
Council offer the Hall Committee of Management $40,000 towards the cost of
repairing the Hall to supplement any grant income which might be received. This offer would be conditional upon the
Department of Lands agreeing to transfer trusteeship from Council to a trust
managed by either an incorporated association or a community Trust Board and
having an incorporated association or community Trust Board willing to accept
that responsibility.
The reason Council
should seek to remove itself from trusteeship is that given competing funding
priorities it cannot justify the anticipated repair costs given the previous
and likely future usage of the Hall; the alternative meeting places which are
available in Bowraville and the on-going liability of maintaining an old
building.
CONSULTATION:
There has been
consultation with the Committee of Management and the Department of Lands. The Department of Lands has advised that
funding for the repair of the Hall may be available under their Public Reserve
Management Fund. This suggestion will be
pursued with a grant application.
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no implications for the environment.
Social
Public Halls have and continue to play an
important role in the social fabric of the community. This is reflected in attendance at Council
meetings whenever the financial viability of certain Halls is discussed.
Economic
There are no economic implications.
Risk
The Hall will remain closed until such time
that repairs are undertaken to make it safe for use.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
No budget provision has been made for the
demolition of the Argents Hill Hall nor the offer of $40,000 in funding towards
the repair of the Hall.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
The provision of funding towards either the
repair of the Hall or its demolition will need to be met from working funds.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.4 SF298 161008 Annual
General Meeting - Argents Hill Hall Committee of Management
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
|
Summary: The report acknowledges the Annual General
Meeting of the Argents Hill Hall Committee of Management and the new
Committee. |
|
1 That Council endorse the Committee of
Management for the Argents Hill Hall for 2008/2009 and thank the outgoing Committee for their work in
2007/2008. 2 That the Community Services Directory
and Committee of Management data file be updated to reflect the new Committee. |
OPTIONS:
There are no real
options. Council needs voluntary
Committees of Management to manage recreation and community facilities across
the
DISCUSSION:
The AGM of the Argents
Hill Hall Committee of Management was held on 20 August 2008.
The new office bearers
for the Committee are:
President: Barry Tasker
Vice President: Darren Grace
Secretary: Chantelle Perkins
Treasurer: Leanne Davidson
Committee Members: Mark Ladkin
Bob Young
Damien Barber
Neil Patterson
The AGM noted that a
report is to be submitted to Council on costings for repairs to the hall.
The Treasurer’s Report
indicates total income for the year ending 20 August 2008 of $1,557.98 and
total expenditure of $1,090.10 for the same period. They have a bank balance of $1,684.63.
CONSULTATION:
There has been no
consultation preparing this report.
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no implications for the environment.
Social
There are no social implications.
Economic
There are no economic implications.
Risk
There are no risk implications.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
There are no financial implications.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There are no implications for working funds.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 0.0 SF946 161008 Annual
General Meeting - Missabotti Hall Committee of Management
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
|
Summary: The report acknowledges the annual general
meeting of the Committee of Management for the Missabotti Hall and the new
Committee. |
|
1. That Council endorse the Committee of
Management for the Missabotti Hall and thank the outgoing Committee for their
work in 2007/2008. 2. That the Community Services Directory and
Committee of Management data source be updated to reflect the new Committee. |
OPTIONS:
There are no real options. Council needs voluntary Committees of
Management to manage recreation and community facilities across the
DISCUSSION:
The Annual General
Meeting of the Missabotti Hall Committee of Management was held on 11 September
2008.
The Committee of
Management for 2008/2009 is:
President June Owen
Vice President Marnie Moran
Secretary Deb Selby
Treasurer Mark Selby
Publicity Officer Brian Creevey
Ordinary Committee
members Dawn Jackson
John Mawson
Belinda Mawson
Mal
Rae
Kerrie Smith
Andrea McGrath
Jeff Unwin
Lee Unwin
Tim Farrelly
Adele Seccombe
The Treasurer’s Report
provided to the Annual General Meeting indicates the Committee has funds of
$2,479.
CONSULTATION:
There has been no
consultation in the preparing this report.
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no implications for the environment.
Social
There are no social implications.
Economic
There are no economic implications.
Risk
There are no risk implications.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
There is no impact on current or future
budgets. The planned work is budgeted
for.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There is no impact on working funds.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.6 SF329 161008 Annual
General Meeting - Crosswinds Nature Reserve
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
|
Summary: The report acknowledges the Annual General
Meeting of the Crosswinds Nature Reserve Committee of Management and the new
Committee. |
|
1 That Council endorse the
Committee of Management for the Crosswinds Nature Reserve and thank the outgoing Committee for their
work in 2007/2008. 2 That the Community
Services Directory and Committee of Management data source be updated to reflect the new
Committee. |
OPTIONS:
There are no real
options. Council needs voluntary
Committees of Management to manage recreation and community facilities across
the Nambucca valley.
DISCUSSION:
The Annual General
Meeting of the Crosswinds Nature Reserve Committee of Management was held on 25
September 2008. The new Committee is:
President: Bob Young
Vice President: Geoff Gough
Secretary/Treasurer Tony Brooks
Tree Warden: Toby Miles
Publicity Officer: Tony Brooks
Water spokesperson: Nick Schenken
Committee: Nick Schenken (Nambucca
Water Users)
Ken Robinson (Gumma Trust)
Toby Miles (Pro Fishermen)
Olive Ussher (Nationals,
Macksville Branch)
Greg Gough (Nambucca
Horticulture)
Frank Stennett (Bee Keepers)
Tony Brooks (NSW Farmers)
Bob Young (Goalama Landcare)
The Committee has a
balance of $542.34 in their bank account.
CONSULTATION:
There has been no
consultation in preparing this report.
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no implications for the environment.
Social
There are no social implications.
Economic
There are no economic implications.
Risk
There are no risk implications.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
There are no financial implications.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There are no implications for working funds.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.7 SF880 161008 Headland
Museum Extension - Resolution to Offer the Nambucca District Historial Society
a Loan of $16,000
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
|
Summary: The Nambucca District Historical Society
requested that Council provide funding support for the recently completed
museum extensions. Taking into account
a grant of $25,000 they had a funding shortfall of $16,000 to complete the
building works. Council resolved to, “offer the Nambucca District Historical
Society a loan of $16,000 for their proposed museum extension”. A recent discussion with the President of
the Committee of Management revealed that he and the Historical Society were
unaware that the funding was in the form of a loan and not a grant. A review of the income and expenditure for
the Historical Society since January 2008 indicates an average monthly income
of $210.58 and an average monthly expenditure of $377.89. Given this it would likely take decades to
repay even an interest free loan at the same time that Council expects the
Committee of Management to operate and maintain the museum. In the circumstances it is recommended that
the loan be converted to a grant. Council will be issuing an invoice to the
Nambucca District Historical Society for $4,000 being the funds they offered
to commit to the project. |
|
1 That
the proposal to provide a loan of $15,500 to the Nambucca District Historical
Society be converted to a grant. 2 Council
note that an invoice will be issued to the Nambucca District Historical
Society for $4,000 being the funds they offered to commit to the project. |
OPTIONS:
Council can maintain its
position and treat the $15,500 as a loan.
However no repayment period was specified.
DISCUSSION:
On 19 April 2007, the
Nambucca District Historical Society wrote to Council requesting that funds be
set aside in the 2007/2008 Council budget to assist with the construction of
the recently completed museum extension.
They set out their financial position as follows:
To complete building to
the lock up stage $40,000
Material to enable
volunteers to complete extension $5,000
Total $45,000
Funds available
Grant (currently
administered by Council) $25,000
Cash on hand $4,000
Short fall $16,000
A copy of their letter
is attached.
At a budget workshop on
23 April 2007 it was resolved that, “Council
offer the Nambucca District Historical Society a loan of $16,000 for their
proposed museum extension”.
The extension has now
been completed and was reported to Council’s meeting on 19 March 2008 with the
following acquittal of funds:
Premier’s Department
Grant $25,000 (ex
GST)
Historical Society $4,000
Council loan (to be
repaid) $15,500
Total $44,500
Contact has been
recently made with the Historical Society who were unaware that it was a loan
and not a grant from Council.
Reviewing the income
and expenditure statements submitted by the Committee of Management for their
B.A.S since January 2008 indicates the Committee of Management achieved an
average monthly income of $210.58 and an average monthly expenditure of
$377.89. Some of the expenditure related
to work to complete the fit out of the extension. As at 30 July 2008, the Historical Society
had a credit balance in their general (operating) account of $2,031 and a
credit balance in their building fund account of $5,601. However of this $5,601 balance, Council will
be issuing an invoice for $4,000 being the Historical Society’s contribution to
the extensions.
Plainly, given the
income and expenditure of the Historical Society which is mainly associated
with the
In the circumstances
it is not considered realistic to pursue a loan for $15,500 and instead it is
recommended that it be converted to a grant from Council.
CONSULTATION:
There has been
consultation with the Nambucca District Historical Society in their capacity as
the Committee of Management for the
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no implications for the environment.
Social
It is important that Council’s volunteer
Committees of Management are provided with support, albeit within the financial
means of Council. They enable Council to
provide many important social and cultural services, which otherwise would be
beyond Council’s means.
Economic
There are no economic implications.
Risk
Risk is mainly associated with a loss of
motivation amongst volunteers.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
Whilst Council resolved to, “offer the Nambucca District Historical
Society a loan of $16,000 for their proposed museum extensions”, it was
interest free and without any stipulation as to a repayment period. A review of the Historical Society’s income
and expenditure indicates that the only feasible repayment schedule would be
over such an extended period that the financial support would, in any case, be
more akin to grant than a loan.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There will be an impact on working funds
being the effective difference between an interest free loan over an extended
period and a grant. In all likelihood
this is not going to be a significant difference.
|
1View |
8278/2007 - Request for funds to be set aside in
07/08 Council budget for help with construction of approved extension to
Museum |
|

|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.8 SF15 161008 Report on
the provision of toilets at the Macksville saleyards
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Steven Williams,
Property Officer
|
Summary: Council has resolved that a report be prepared on the provision of
toilets at the Macksville saleyards. Currently the toilet amenities available to saleyard patrons are
situated in the showground complex approximately 100 metres from the
saleyards. Enquires were made by the Director of Engineering as to the feasibility
of constructing a dedicated amenities block closer to the saleyard
complex. It was estimated that the
approximate cost of such a facility would be in excess of $100,000.00. The author understands Council decided not
to pursue this option as a new toilet block was not considered warranted for
the sale yard operation. Subsequent enquiries have been made into the provision of portable toilet facilities to be insitu on
sale days. Quotes have been received with the most affordable being in the
approximate amount $3,000.00 per year. The 2008/09 operating budget accounts for a net operating deficit based
on budgeted revenue, expenses, acquisitions, maintenance and corporate
support. Available funds should be directed to saleyard issues of higher
priority than the provision of additional toilet facilities. |
|
That Council not
pursue the provision of additional toilets at the Macksville Sale Yards as
adequate facilities already exist. |
OPTIONS:
· Provide
three portable toilets as per special event guidelines standards.
· Provide
one portable toilet to supplement the showground amenities.
DISCUSSION:
It is understood
that the request for a report to be prepared was on the basis that there have been recent events at the saleyards involving many
visitors. By way of example Cr Moran
submitted the recent Showjumping championship and commented that “Whilst
toilets are available at the Showground they are a distance away which is
inconvenient, especially at night”. The
provision of a toilet block on the Eastern side of the Showground complex would
provide greater convenience to saleyard and showground patrons.
Currently the
toilet amenities available to saleyard patrons are situated in the Showground
complex approximately 100 metres from the Saleyards. At a casual strolling pace it takes
approximately 1 minute to walk across a level grassed area to the Showground
amenities block
The Director of Engineering
has submitted cost estimates for the construction of a dedicated toilet block
in excess of $100,000.00.
Quotes for the
provision of portable toilets amount to approximately $2,500.00 per year (for a
single portable toilet) or in excess of $9,000.00 (for three toilets - required
as the minimum standard for stand alone events).
The Saleyard
Manager has advised that patronage levels on sale days are between 60 (average)
to 100 (on heavy sale days). Sales are
held generally between 9.00 am and 1.00 pm. The Saleyard Manager advised that
the provision of toilets would be well received but that “other improvements to
the yards should take priority”.
Whilst it is
acknowledged that the provision of toilets would be more convenient to saleyard
patrons, and further, that the construction of an amenities block would be a
positive improvement to the infrastructure at the Showgrounds there are
significant other improvements that should be prioritised over such a service.
In particular
attention is required to the improvement of the sale ring seating
arrangements. Current arrangements have
been identified by Council’s Safety and Risk Officer as posing a potential
injury risk. This will necessarily incur relatively significant
expenditure. Future attention is also
required to effluent management at the yards and the completion of upgraded
fencing.
CONSULTATION:
Safety and Risk
Officer
Director
Engineering Services
Saleyards Manager
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no
environmental issues arising from this report.
Social
There are no
social issues arsing from this report.
Economic
There are no economic issues arising from
the recommendations.
Risk
There are no risk issues arising from the recommendations.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
No
impact on budgets unless it is resolved to pursue the construction of an
amenities block or provide portable toilets on Sales days.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
Funds
are not required for the recommendation.
If
either of the options is pursued additional funds would need to be drawn form
working funds to supplement the saleyard operating budget in the amounts quoted
above.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.9 SF1186 161008 Outcome
of Public Meeting Concerning Proposed Telecommunications Facility for Optus
Mobile Pty Ltd -
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
|
Summary: Optus Mobile is proposing to erect a mobile
phone base station on the Macksville Water Reservoir in Council has no authority to regulate the
placement of such low impact telecommunications facility. Under the Federal legislation the Carrier
has general powers to enter land; to install a low impact facility and to
maintain that facility. The Carrier is
obliged to undertake a public consultation process. However it is understandable that the community is concerned about a
consultation process where it is left to the Carrier to finally make a
decision weighing competing considerations including cost. There is an obvious perception that the
Carrier has a conflict of interests. |
|
That Council
advise the Australian Communications and Media Authority that it objects to
the provisions of the Telecommunications Act 1997 which allows Carriers to
locate “low impact facilities” as it has a conflict of interests in weighing
competing considerations such as community opinion and cost. |
OPTIONS:
Council has no authority
under the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Commonwealth) to regulate “low impact
facilities”. Under the Industry Code for the Deployment of Mobile
Phone Network Infrastructure Council is not responsible for the community
consultation process. Council, like the
community, has the opportunity to make a submission on the proposal to locate a
low impact telecommunications facility on the
Council has negotiated a
lease for the use by Optus of the water reservoir for the placement of a mobile
phone base station and antennae (low impact facility) but Optus have a right to
install a low impact facility regardless.
Council could recommend
an alternative location for the telecommunications facility. Optus have indicated that for operational
reasons there are only two viable site options being either the
DISCUSSION:
Council will be aware of
significant complaints from residents in relation to this proposed
telecommunications facility. The matter
was reported to Council’s meeting on 7 August 2008.
The Telecommunications
Act 1997 (Commonwealth) is the applicable legislation in terms of the placement
of telecommunications for mobile telephones.
Schedule 3 of the
legislation provides a Carrier with general powers in relation to “low impact”
facilities to enter on land to determine if it is suitable for the Carrier’s
purposes; to install a facility on land and to maintain the facility.
Council has no authority
to seek a development application for this work.
Under the Industry Code for the Deployment of Mobile
Phone Network Infrastructure, otherwise known as the ACIF Code, Carriers
(not Council) undertake a community consultation process in line with Sections
5.4 and 5.5. The Code provides that the
Carrier notify Council about the work and before commencing the proposed work
the Carrier must carry out community consultation in accordance with an adopted
plan.
Council received a
letter from Connell Wagner on behalf of Optus on 7 July 2008 advising that they
had determined that a site on the existing water tower at 85 Wallace Street as
being the most appropriate location for a mobile phone base station. Further that the base station is classified
as Low Impact under Schedule 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 and therefore
does not require a development application.
The purpose of the base station is to introduce Optus’ new WCDMA 900
data and voice mobile phone service in the local area. The letter included their proposed consultation
plan.
Council received a
further letter from Connell Wagner dated 16 July 2008 inviting Council to
provide written comments on the proposal until 15 August 2008. The letter advises that at the end of the
consultation period, Optus will provide Council with a report detailing the
outcome of the consultation and notifying of their intended actions regarding
the proposal. Optus states it will not
commence the work until after the report has been given to Council. A copy of this report is attached.
At Council’s meeting on
7 August 2008 it was resolved as follows:
1 That
Optus Mobile be requested to provide appropriate technical and management staff
to attend a public information and question and answer meeting in Macksville
and that the period for written comments be extended until one week after the
meeting. Further that the Optus staff to
attend the meeting be requested to specifically address concerns about
electromagnetic radiation and their reasons for preferring the water reservoir
site.
2 That
Council offer the use of the Council Chambers to Optus Mobile for the public information
and question and answer meeting.
3 That Optus Pty Ltd be
requested to address their compliance with the ACIF Code.
The public meeting was
conducted on 22 September 2008 in the Council Chambers with about 30 concerned
residents being in attendance. Also in
attendance were Councillors Hoban (Chair), South, Smyth, Flack, Mr Greg Pierce
from Luke Hartsuyker’s office, the General Manager and Manager Water and
Sewerage. Apologies were received from
Councillors Ainsworth and Moran.
Optus Mobile Pty Ltd was
represented by Mr Howard Game (Acquisitions Manager), Mr Lance Lin (Project
Manager), Mr Alan Shand (Radio Frequency Engineer), and Ms Laura O’Connell
(Environmental Planner, Connell & Wagner).
Mr Game provided a
briefing on the operational requirements of a mobile telephone network; their
assessment of site alternatives within Macksville; and the power output of a
typical mobile telephone base station compared to health standards.
He advised that for
operational reasons the only viable options for a mobile base station for
Macksville were either an existing light pole on the Allan Gillett oval or on
the water reservoir in
He advised that actual
EMR transmissions from mobile telephone base stations were often 1% or less of
an already conservative standard and that AM/FM radio and television were far
more significant contributors to EMR. He
also advised that maximum EMR transmissions did not occur immediately adjacent
to an antennae but at some distance, depending upon the topography. This is because the antennae are angled
slightly towards the ground.
There was discussion
about the “trade-offs” associated with antennae placement being that less
optimal sites would require greater transmission power and EMR than optimal
sites and that adaptive power receivers mean that a mobile handset will
increase power and hence EMR to receive a poor signal.
Optus also made
available information packs from the Australian Communications and Media
Authority concerning mobile phone towers and EME.
In order to compare the
two alternative sites, maps have been prepared indicating the properties within
a 500m radius of each site. These maps
are attached. They indicate there are actually more
properties within a 500m radius of the Allan Gillett oval than the
The decision as to the
location of the mobile telephone base station is ultimately a matter for Optus
operating within the Telecommunications Act 1997 and the Industry Code for the
Deployment of Mobile Phone Network Infrastructure. However it is understandable that the
community is concerned about a consultation process where it is left to the
Carrier to finally make a decision weighing competing considerations including
cost. There is an obvious perception
that the Carrier has a conflict of interests.
CONSULTATION:
There has been an
extended consultation process including a public meeting in the Council
Chambers.
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
According to the briefing provided by Optus
there are no significant implications for the environment.
Social
Many residents are concerned about the
placement of low impact telecommunications facilities in residential areas.
Economic
Enabling competition amongst mobile phone
Carriers is in the interests of the community.
Risk
According to the briefing provided by Optus
there are no significant risks.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
The only sites identified as viable options
are located on Council land, either of which would require a lease. Whilst there would be no difference in
income, in terms of Council’s funding the lease payments for the water
reservoir site would be directed to the Water Fund whilst the lease payments
for Allan Gillett Oval would be directed to the General Fund. The negotiated annual rental for the water
reservoir site is $11,570 subject to a 5% increase each year.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
Any income from a lease has not been
budgeted for and would need to be brought to account in a budget review.
|
1View |
24748/2008 - 500m radius of Optus Antennae on
Wallace Street Water Reservoir |
|
|
2View |
24746/2008 - 500m radius of Optus Antennae on
Allan Gillett Oval |
|
|
3View |
25223/2008 - Summary Report for NSW Meeting 16
October 2008 - Optus Mobile Pty Ltd - from Connell Wagner |
|












|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.10 SF1126 161008 Financial Reports - 30 June 2008
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Faye Hawthorne,
Accountant; Craig Doolan, Manager Financial Services
|
Summary: Council is required to make
declarations under Section 413(2)(C) of the Local Government Act, Local Government Code of
Accounting Practice and Financial reporting as per the following
recommendations and detailed in the discussion. |
|
1 That
the Mayor, one other Councillor, the General Manager and Responsible
Accounting Officer be authorised to sign the Statement on the General Purpose
Financial Reports by Councillors and Management made pursuant to Section
413(2)(C) of the Local Government Act. 2 That
the Mayor, one other Councillor, the General Manager and Responsible
Accounting Officer be authorised to sign the Statement on the Special Purpose
Financial Reports by Councillors and Management made pursuant to the Local
Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting. |
OPTIONS:
Council’s
financial reports must include a statement in approved form as set out in Sect.
215 of the Local Government (General) Regulation as to its opinion on the
general purpose special purpose financial reports. The declarations are
required under the Local Government Act and Local Government Code of Accounting
Practice and Financial Reporting and therefore needed in order for an audit to
commence.
Council has the option to form another opinion on
the Financial Reports bearing in mind that audit will need to be deferred until
Council agrees to make a statement on the Financial Reports in the approved
form.
DISCUSSION:
Council at its
meeting on the 02 October 2008 resolved to adopt the June Budget Review
Financial Report for the year ended 30 June 2008 subject to the Financial
Statements being audited by Council’s Auditor.
It is anticipated
that the audit will commence this month and therefore it is expected the final
audit will be completed to allow the audited Statements to be provided to the
Department before the 31 October 2008 and presented to the Public prior to
the end of November 2008.
A further report
of the results for 2007/2008 will be presented to Council prior to presentation
to the public.
In accordance with
the requirements of Section 413(2)(C) of the Local Government Act and the Local
Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting, Council is
required to prepare statements in the approved form as to its opinion on the
general purpose and special purpose financial reports.
The General
Purpose Reports Statement by Councillors and Management declares:
1 That
the Financial Reports to be submitted to the Auditor have been drawn up in
accordance with:
· The
Local Government Act 1993 (as amended) and the Regulations made thereunder,
· The
Australian Accounting Standards and professional pronouncements,
· The
Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting,
· The Local Government Asset Accounting Manual.
2 That
the Financial Reports also:
· Present
fairly the Council’s financial position and operating result for the year, and
· Accord
with Council’s accounting and other records.
3 That
we are not aware of any matters that would render the reports false or
misleading in any way.
The Statement must
be made by resolution of Council and be signed by the Mayor, at least one other
Councillor, the Responsible Accounting Officer and the General Manager. The Statement has to be completed and
attached to the relevant annual financial reports to enable the audit process
to proceed.
The Special
Purpose Reports Statement must also be signed by the Mayor, at least one other
Councillor, the Responsible Accounting Officer and the General Manager.
The Statement
declares:
1 That the Special Purpose
Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the Local Government
Code of Accounting Practice and Financial reporting and the
· NSW
Government Policy Statement “Application of National Competition Policy to
Local Government”
· Department
of Local Government guidelines “Pricing & Costing for Council
Businesses: A Guide to Competitive
Neutrality”.
· The
Department of Water and Energy Practice Management of Water Supply and Sewerage
Guidelines.
2 These reports, to the best of our
knowledge and belief
· Present
fairly the financial position and operating result for each of Council’s
declared Business Units for the year, and
· Accord
with Council’s accounting and other records
3 That we are not aware of
any matter that would render the reports false or misleading in any way.
CONSULTATION:
Local Government
Act 1993
Local Government
(General) Regulation 2005
Local Government
Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no environmental implications.
Social
There are no social implications.
Economic
There are no economic implications.
Risk
There are no risk implications.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
Not applicable for
this report.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
Financial
implications were discussed as part of the 30 June Budget Review presented to
Council at its meeting 02 October 2008. Results
for the year ending 30 June 2008 will be finalised in report on the audited
Financial Statements.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16 October 2008 |
General Manager's
Report
ITEM 9.11 SF708 161008 Grant Application Status Report - October 2008
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Jenny Chance,
Grants Officer
|
Summary: At Council’s
meeting on 7 December 2006 it was resolved that there be a quarterly return
submitted to Council on grant programs.
The following table provides a report on grant programs which Council has
been made aware of; their closing date; consultation with community groups;
their current status and eventual determination by the funding body. |
|
That the list of grant programs and their status be
received. |
|
|
Grant Program |
Action |
Status |
|
1 |
FRRR - Small Grants for Small Rural Australian
Communities There are two rounds of Small
Grants per year. Closing dates are 31 March and 30 September 2007 and 2008 A program for small rural
communities will offer grants of up $50,000 to benefit people in rural and
remote Advised of new closing dates as follows: 1 May 2008 6 August 2008 27 October
2008. |
MS |
A program of the Foundation for Rural and
Regional Renewal closes on 30th March and 30th
September 2008. (Warrell Creek
Hall Committee of Management lodged an application on 21 September
2007.) Information regarding the next round for
2008 has been sent to all Section 355 Hall Committees, the Museums, the
Macksville Gift Secretary, placed on Council's website and in the Councillors
Newsletter 30 October 2007. Letter sent to all Section 355 Hall
Committees of Mgt on 30 October 2007. Nambucca Entertainment Centre lodged
application March 2008 for curtains
& blinds. South Arm Hall lodged an application in
March 2008 for water tank. Letter sent to all Section 355 Committees
of Mgt 18 March 2008 for new rounds. · Valla Community Hall
(Revitalisation) are submitting an application for 1 May 2008 |
|
2 |
Local Adaptation Pathways Program The Federal
Government has announced the "Local Adaptation Pathways Program" to
provide funding to help local government build their capacity to respond to
the impacts of climate change. The
Australian Government will provide up to $50,000 to help |
GM |
Application lodged. |
|
3 |
Department of Environment and Climate Change |
DEP |
Application for additional "Flood Study" to provide more accurate Flood Mapping of the Shire. Lodged 15 February 2008. Closing date 15 February 2008—announcement expected later 2008 |
|
4 |
Department of Environment and Climate Change – NSW
Climate Change Fund – Public Facilities Program |
GM |
$30m for water and energy saving projects in facilities open to the public eg schools, community buildings, sporting facilities, museums and art galleries. Unaware of program’s existence until raised at meeting on 7 February. Applications closed on 13 February. No applications lodged by Council. |
|
5 |
New Federal Environmental Programme - Still to be
announced |
GM DES DEP |
The Area
Consultative Committee (ACC) is proposing to take a lead role in putting
forward an expression of interest for a major environmental project for
Federal funding based on a “Clean Waters Model” implemented for |
|
6 |
Threatened Species Network Community Grants Round 11
TSN Grants
Administration [mailto:TSNGrants@wwf.org.au] Trim document 7374/2008
refers to application |
DEP |
Round
11 of the Threatened Species Network Community Grants Program is now open. Community
groups are invited to apply for up to $50,000 to conduct on-ground
conservation work for the ongoing health of our natural environment,
specifically targeting the needs of nationally threatened species and
ecological communities. Funding is available for activities such as habitat
restoration, weeding, feral animal control, population surveys and
monitoring, fencing, and fire management. Original
signed applications must be received in WWF's Grant advertised in local paper. |
|
8 |
Department of Environment & Climate Change
Estuary and Coastal Management Programs 2008/09 Funding
on a 1:1 basis Closing date: 28 May 2008 |
DEP |
Several
projects identified and supported through the Nambucca River Estuary and
Coastline Management Committee · Flood study—Deep Creek · Implementation of · Updated flood study Stage
2 Coastal Hazard management Plan. |
|
9 |
NSW Environmental Trust Round 3 – Urban
Sustainability Program Closing date: 20 June 2008 |
DEP |
Council previously resolved to submit both a joint application
with Bellingen and Coffs Harbour Councils and an individual application. Amended criteria excluded individual
applications. Joint application
lodged. |
|
10 |
Community Heritage Grants Closing date: 30 June 2008 with National Library
of |
DEP |
Information sent to all Museums—13/5/08 |
|
11 |
Northern Rivers CMA – River Reach Program. Ongoing funding program |
DEP |
Stage 2 Lower Nambucca River, River Bank stabilization, rubbish
and weed eradication. ( Funding application proposal from the Nyambaga Green Team. Total
application for Stage 2 $35,000 - $45,000. Council contribution of $5000 maximum to provide some machinery
to collect and remove rubbish, vegetation; prepare traffic management plan
for traffic control on Council’s $5,000 (max) in-kind contribution from the
Environmental Levy. |
|
12 |
NSW Maritime – Maritime Infrastructure Program Funding
on a 1:1 basis Closes: 22 August 2008 |
GO & MTS |
The Maritime Infrastructure Program (MIP) provides up to $2M
annually to local government and community organisations for waterways
infrastructure projects that benefit the recreational boating community
across NSW, including the provision of public wharves/jetties, boatramps,
public sewage pumpout facilities and public moorings. Applications submitted for Pontoon and Gangway at Applications submitted with the assistance of the Nambucca River
Users Group for pontoon at Macksville with $15,000 from the Environmental
Levy and In-kind contributions. Site meeting with MIP Manager to discuss projects – 24 September
2008. |
|
13 |
Caring for our Country Caring
for our Country Open Grants Closes:
1 August 2008 Community
Coastcare Closes:
25 July 2008 |
GO |
Caring for our
Country is the Federal Government's new natural resource management program. An application
has been submitted to the National Reserve System on behalf of the Nambucca
Heads Local Aboriginal Land Council to purchase Faringdon Fields. |
|
14 |
Natural Disaster Mitigation Program Attorney
General’s Department – Emergency Management Closes:
29 August 2008 Funding
on a 1:1:1 basis |
DES |
The Natural Disaster Mitigation Program aims to identify and
address natural disaster risk priorities across the nation. Funds are
available for a range of measures that contribute to safer, sustainable
communities better able to withstand the effects of natural disasters. This program is being jointly funded by Commonwealth, State and
local governments to help local communities better prepare for natural
disasters such as floods, bushfires, storms or landslides. |
|
15 |
Regional Arts Fund (NSW) Australian Government – Regional Arts Fund Closes:
14 August 2008 |
MBD |
Application for Macksville Memorial Aquatic Centre mosaic mural
under the Partnerships Program. |
|
16 |
NSW Blackspot Program Closes: 22 August 2008 |
MTS |
RTA is inviting all Councils to identify and nominate new
conforming projects for the 2009-2010 programme. Construction costs must be
greater than $10,000 for rural Councils. Application completed to gain funding for pedestrian refuge at
Bowra Street (intersection of Wellington Drive, Woods Lane, Back Street, Fraser
Street), Nambucca Heads |
|
17 |
Department of Lands NSW Government’s Waterways Program Closes: 26 September 2008 Funding on 1:1 basis |
GO |
Expression of interest need only identify the area to be dredged, an indicative dredging cost, the relationship with any existing estuary management plan, comment on history / practicality of dredging and an indication of the benefits to be obtained from the dredging (with a focus on recreational boating). Department of Lands is interested in projects that may fall into next years budget or next 2 to 3 years and ongoing as they understand that Council may not have allocated any funding in current budget to project. For further
information please see Trim document 20060/2008. It is suggested that Council do not submit
an application for major dredging as Council has not the allocated 50% of
funds required under this program. An application maybe considered for minor
work downstream of the |
|
18 |
Northern
Rivers CMA River
Health Plan Development (Stage 1) Closes: 1 December 2008 |
GO |
River Health Plan Development (Stage 1) A River Reach plan needs to be developed prior
to project implementation. In most cases, groups undertake the plan
development in one year and then apply to implement the plan the following
year. To develop a river health plan Council can: Submit an Expression of Interest (EOI) for
Plan Development using form provided. This is a competitive process, EOIs for
plan development will be assessed (using eligibility criteria) and ranked.
Successful applicants will receive assistance from an NRCMA officer to
produce a plan, OR Produce a plan independently. |
|
19 |
Northern
Rivers CMA Development and Implementation of local Government local scale
coastline NRM plans |
GO |
Funding to provide consistent standardised beach
access signage across the Shires coastal foreshore accesses utilising current
best practice signage systems for aquatic and recreational use. Joint application with DECC. |
|
20 |
Area
Assistance Scheme Closes:
10 October 2008 |
GO & MCCS |
The Area Assistance Scheme (AAS)
is a regional community development program run by the Department of
Community Services. It provides grants to local councils and non-government
organisations for projects that improve community well being and how
communities function. The AAS works within a whole-of-government framework to
deliver its outcomes. Council staff in consultation
with the committees of management are in the process of identifying possible
projects for submission. |
|
21 |
Arts
NSW – Program Funding and Project Funding Closes:
10 October 2008 |
GO |
Program funding is intended to be applied to the costs of delivering the principal annual artistic program and activities. Funding may be used for salaries and professional fees, administration and office-related expenditure, and annual production costs. Project funding is for one-off or time limited projects. Projects include a wide range of artistic events, products, activities or facilities that are separate from or in addition to the annual program of works. Projects do not include annual salaried positions associated with operating an organisation (these are funded under Program Funding). Funds may be used for artists or arts workers fees or production costs associated with delivery of the project. Appendix 1 provides a list of project categories eligible for funding. |
|
22 |
Cities
for Climate Protection Energy
Data Management and Emissions Reporting Project Expression
of Interest Closes:
13 October 2008 Ten Grants of $10,000 each administered to
each of the ten participating Councils |
MCW GO |
The objective is to build participating local governments’ capacities to manage energy and emissions related data for the following purposes: · The on-going reporting and analysis of corporate greenhouse emissions · The reporting and analysis of savings from abatement actions · The assessment of investments in energy conservation, energy efficiency and renewable energy projects · The day-to-day management of emissions-intensive Council operations Application submitted |
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.12 LF4391 161008 Withdrawal of Caveat over Lots 14-22 DP
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Steven Williams,
Property Officer
|
Summary: Council holds
caveat over lots 14 - 22 in Deposited plan 1107549 being properties in the
village of Eungai Creek and facing Eungai Creek Road. The above Lots
are the product of a two stage subdivision of the original lot which was the
subject of a deed of agreement between the Council and the then Owners Mr
& Mrs Cecil. Council has since consented to the registration of a
Transfer to the current owner Senggigi Pty Ltd. The initial
Caveat was lodged to protect Council’s interest in the Deed. The conditions
of the Deed , in essence, were that the subdividers shall permit storm water
run off to flow from lots in the subdivision onto the residue lot and shall
permit existing stormwater run off from adjoining roads and lanes to continue
to discharge onto the residual lot. Council at their
meeting on 19 August 2004 approved the withdrawal of caveats over all but the
residual lot. The residual lot has subsequently been subdivided to create
lots 14 -22. The developer
has now requested for the withdrawal of Caveat over lot 17 in readiness for
settlement of the sale of this lot on 27 October 2008. The withdrawal of Caveats on residential
lots in a staged subdivision is a common request. The senior town
planner Mr Ben Oliver has advised that on inspection of the current plan
there is no reason to hold Caveat over lots 14-21. The terms of the Deed of
agreement have been satisfied with respect to lots 14 – 21. To facilitate
future requests it is recommended that Council approve the withdrawal of
Caveat over lots 14 – 21 in DP 1107549. |
|
1 That Council acknowledge
that the terms of the Deed of Agreement dated 24 May 2000 have been satisfied
with respect to Lot 14-21 ( inclusive) in DP 1107549 and accordingly
Council approves the withdrawal of Caveats on Lots 14-21 (inclusive) in DP
1107549 and to authorise Councils common seal to be affixed to the relevant
documents subject to all costs being borne by the subdivider. 2 That Council retain the Caveat over
the residual lot being folio identifier 22/1107549 |
OPTIONS:
There are no
options as the caveatable interest has been satisfied with respect to lots 14 –
21 in DP 1107549.
DISCUSSION:
See summary.
CONSULTATION:
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no
environmental impacts arising from the recommendations
Social
There are no
social impacts arising from the recommendations
Economic
There are no
economic impacts arsing from the recommendation
Risk
There is a risk of
legal action in the event Council does not approve the withdrawal of Caveat on
the basis the Caveatable interest has been satisfied.
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
No
Direct and indirect impact on current and future budgets
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
No
variance to working funds.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.13 SF587 161008 Continuance of Lease to
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Steven Williams,
Property Officer
|
Summary: Council
purchased The lease
contains a continuance clause whereby the lease continues on a week to week
basis terminable by one week’s notice and on the same terms and conditioned
otherwise contained in the lease. As the termination date has since expired
the lease continues on this basis. The Manager
Water and Sewage has advised that it is unlikely that capital works will
commence within the next two years. On this basis there is no reason why the
lease cannot continue. The nominal rent
payable under the lease is to be made yearly in advance. This is generally
raised at the commencement of the financial year but has been stayed pending
direction from Council has to the continuance of the lease. From a house
keeping point of view it would be preferable to have a definite and agreed
termination date. The author
understands that the provisions of the lease are otherwise acceptable for
council’s purposes and that the lessee has complied with all lease
obligations. Options include
allowing the lease to continue on a weekly basis, entering into a deed of
variation whereby a new termination date is set or entering into an entirely
new lease. |
|
1 That council note that
the original lease of 2 That council write to
the lessee of Lot 6 in DP 1076377 confirming the status and provisions of the
current lease of Lot 6 in DP 1076377 and make arrangements for
future rents to be raised and paid in the same manner as the original lease. 3 That in the event that
the lessee of Lot 6 in DP 1076377 is not satisfied with the continuing
provisions of the existing lease Council authorise the General Manager or
Mayor to conclude negotiations for a new lease on similar terms to the
existing lease for a period concluding not later than October 2010 and to
sign all necessary documents, under council seal where applicable, to give
effect to the new agreement. |
OPTIONS:
1 Do nothing and allow the
lease to continue as per the lease agreement. Should Council pursue this avenue
rent payable under the lease would be raised in arrears on a 6 monthly basis
but otherwise using the same rental basis as the lease.
2 Seek to enter into a
Deed of Variation with the Lessee whereby a new termination date is set. This
would necessarily incur additional legal fees. It should be noted that that
legal fees for the preparation of the original lease were borne by council.
3 Seek to enter into a new
lease agreement ( see point two above)
DISCUSSION:
See summary
CONSULTATION:
Manager Water and
Sewage
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no
environmental issue arsing from this report although it should be noted that
the land is currently used and maintained by the lessee which is an advantage
to council insofar as maintenance and weed control.
Social
There are no
social issues arsing from this report
Economic
There are no
economic issues arising from this report
Risk
There are no
foreseeable risks arsing from the recommendations.
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
Currently
Council collects a nominal rent from the lessee. The continuance of the lease
will preserve this revenue. In the event the lease is discontinued council will
need to ensure the land is maintained and will bear the cost of such
maintenance.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There
will be no variance to working funds arising from the recommendation. It should
be noted, however, that legal fees for the drafting of a new lease may be
incurred and will be sourced from General Working Funds.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16
October 2008 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.14 SF352 161008 Cr Martin Ballangarry OAM - Request for Leave - 9 to
17 October 2008
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Monika Schuhmacher,
Executive Assistant
|
Summary: Cr Martin Ballangarry OAM has requested
leave of absence from Thursday 9 October 2008 to Friday 17 October 2008,
inclusive, to attend to family matters. |
|
That
Cr Martin Ballangarry OAM, in accordance with Section 234(d) of the Local
Government Act, be granted leave of absence from Thursday 9 October 2008 to Friday 17 October 2008, inclusive. |
OPTIONS:
There are no options to
consider.
DISCUSSION:
Cr Ballangarry advised
the Acting General Manager 8 October 2008.
CONSULTATION:
There has been no
further consultation.
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There is no impact on the environment.
Social
There is no social impact.
Economic
There are no economic implications.
Risk
There is no risk.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
There is no impact on the budget.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There is no variance to working funds.
There are no attachments for this report.
|
16
October 2008 |
Director Environment &
Planning's Report
ITEM 10.1 SF691 161008 Outstanding Development applications more than 12
months old and applications where submissions have been received and not
determined to 2 October 2008
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Barbara Sadler,
Executive Assistant
|
Summary: In accordance with Council resolution from
15 May 2008 meeting, the development applications listed below are in excess
of 12 months old (Table 1). Table 2 are development applications which
have been received but not yet determined due to submissions received. These
DA’s are presented should any Councillor wish to “call in” the application to
a future meeting. If an application is not called in and staff consider the
matters raised by the submissions have been adequately addressed then the
application will be processed under delegated authority. Where refusal is
recommended the application may be reported to Council for determination. |
|
1 That the list of outstanding
development applications (at least 12 months old) and applications received,
be noted and received for information by Council. 2 That the applications where
submissions have been received be noted and received for information by
Council. 3 That Council determine if any of the
applications where submissions have been received, are to be “called in” and
presented to a future meeting of Council. |
OPTIONS:
TABLE 1: UNRESOLVED
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IN EXCESS OF 12 MONTHS OLD
|
FILE
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
COMMENTS
ON APPLICATION |
|
2005/310 |
19/4/05 |
Change of Use to Furniture
Manufacturing Business |
|
DA approval relies upon rezoning under draft LEP 66. |
|
2008/013 |
12/07/07 |
Dwelling-House |
Lot 223 DP 828243, |
31/07/07 – Letter requesting Bush Fire assessment. |
|
2008/013 continued |
|
|
|
18/03/08 – Telephone contact with owner, owner has not made contact
with Bush Fire Consultant requested to lodge letter seeking extension of time
to have report prepared |
|
2008/037 |
17/08/07 |
Dwelling |
Lot 1 DP 575759, |
28/09/07 - Letter to owner
requesting Bushfire assessment Report 5/12/07 - Bushfire report received 6/12/07 - report referred to Local RFS 18/12/07 - response from RFS requesting further information 19/12/07 - letter to owner requesting additional information. 14/03/08 - 14 day letter to owner requesting Bushfire consultants
report or withdraw application 07/05/08 - Rang applicant
– does not want to withdraw. Need extra time to get information together. |
|
2008/043 |
24/08/07 |
Supermarket, three specialty shops and car park |
Lot 2 DP 544563, Lot 13 DP 654087 & |
DA relies on Department of Planning’s determination of draft LEP 66.
Council resolution 19/6/08 to approve the application subject to draft LEP 66
being made by the Minister. |
TOTAL
APPLICATIONS OUTSTANDING 12 MONTHS OR MORE:
4
TABLE 2: Development Applications where submissions
have been received and are not yet determined.
|
DA
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
SUBMISSIONS
RECEIVED/STAFF COMMENTS |
|
2008/193 |
11/3/08 |
6 |
Lot 15 DP 114372, Lot 1 DP 386702, Lot 71 DP 654563, Lot 120 DP
755538, Lot 23 DP 755548 & Lots 44,45,49 & 98 in DP 755546, 207-208
Upper Buckrabendinni Road Buckrabendinni |
§ Access from
proposed lots § Location of
dwelling envelopes § Aboriginal and
archaeological issues “Stop the clock” in place as it is an Integrated
application. Outstanding matters yet to be finalised and
discussed with applicant. Unlikely to be determined in the immediate future |
|
DA
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
SUBMISSIONS
RECEIVED/STAFF COMMENTS |
|
2008/244 |
26/05/08 |
New dwelling & demolition of existing dwelling |
Lot 5 DP 247073, |
§ Submission
received stating the design does not address the objectives of DCP 3. § Proposal fails to address amenity impacts
on objector’s property 29/05/08 Further information requested from
applicant |
|
2008/267 |
24/06/08 |
Proposed Industrial complex for manufacturing buses and ancillary
facilities, including manager’s residence and workers cottages. |
|
§ Several
submissions have been received objecting to the development as not being
suitable for this location as it is not zoned for industrial use and there is
residential land surround the proposed area (which is zoned rural) § Flooding issues § Residential
amenity will be affected by light industrial use of the land including visual
impact § Perceived
lowering of values of land 26/08/08
Advice from applicant additional information to be submitted by the end of
October. |
|
2008/269 |
30/06/08 |
Deck, Garage & Alterations – Change of use to Residential |
|
§ Submission
received in relation to conflicting landuse if converted from Commercial to
Residential use and any noise issues from current practices § Loss of
commercial premises Application
modified to included continued use as a dwelling which has been notified to
adjoining owners |
|
2009/022 |
26/08/08 |
Erect Industrial Shed and Commence Industry to manufacture granular
products |
Lot 75 DP 800111, |
§ Submissions
received in relation to emissions from new development as current business
causing airborne dust and odour Concerns
with site distances for semi-trailers turning and going over the centre line
– referred to Traffic Committee. Further
advice received from the applicant by letter dated 2 October 2008. Issues
being considered. |
|
2009/030 |
09/09/08 |
Steel Frame Carport |
Lot 3 DP 17699, |
§ Submission
received in relation to insufficient information on plans § Reflection of
roof and walls § Stormwater
disposal § Ensuring the current retaining wall is not
compromised § Earthworks for footings have already
commenced § Distance of carport from side boundary
incorrect 7/10/08 Applicant to be
contacted within 7 days requesting that concerns be addressed |
|
2004/014/01 |
01/09/08 |
Residential |
Lot 7 DP |
§ Proposal may set
precedent for undermining current local amenity § Not in keeping
with DCP § Should limit
height to 8m § Overuse of site
coverage § Setback requirements not met § Aesthetics not suitable for the location 7/10/08 Senior Development
Planner assessing and considering concerns raised |
|
2005/291/01 |
1/08/08 |
Concrete Batching Plant - Modify Saturday trading hours |
Lot 12 in DP 1046434 and |
§ Concerns with
noise, dust and vibration § No benefits to
community to extend hours – may set precedent § Reduces opportunities to move cattle § Lack of consistency with other quarries’
operating hours § Confers commercial advantage on one quarry
only § Difficulties in calculating tonnage of
material moved § Increase in truck movements bad for § Increase in volume would make development
“designated” and it should be treated as such § Uncertain as to whether operators have
fulfilled current DA conditions. 7/10/08
Senior Development Planner assessing and considering concerns raised |
|
1998/055/01 |
1/08/08 |
Hard Rock Quarry |
Lot 12 in DP 1046434 and |
§ Concerns with
noise, dust and vibration § No benefits to
community to extend hours – may set precedent § Reduces opportunities to move cattle § Lack of consistency with other quarries’
operating hours § Confers commercial advantage on one quarry
only § Difficulties in calculating tonnage of
material moved § Increase in truck movements bad for § Increase in volume would make development
“designated” and it should be treated as such § Uncertain as to whether operators have
fulfilled current DA conditions. 7/10/08
Senior Development Planner assessing and considering concerns raised |
|
2006/143/01 |
18/07/08 |
13 |
Lot 22 DP 1036142, |
§ Will destroy an
Endangered Ecological Community § Council is
abrogating responsibility by removing requirement for qualified specialist to
check for koalas 7/10/08
Senior Development Planner assessing and considering concerns raised |
There are no attachments for this report.