ORDINARY
COUNCIL MEETING - 4 JUNE 2009
AGENDA Page
1 APOLOGIES
2 PRAYER
3 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
4 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES — Ordinary
Council Meeting - 21 May 2009
5 Notices
of Motion
5.1 Notice of Motion -
Pedestrian Crossing -
6 DELEGATIONS (if any)—Motion
to hear Delegations
7 ASKING OF QUESTIONS WITH
NOTICE
8 QUESTIONS FOR CLOSED
MEETING WHERE DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED
9 General Manager Report
9.1 Outstanding
Actions and Reports March 2009
9.2 Grant
Application Status Report - 4 June 2009
9.3 Debriefing
on 31 March/1 April Flood Event
9.4 Review
of the Tourism Function
9.5 Integrated
Planning and Reporting - Release of Draft Legislation and Mandatory Guidelines
9.6 Maintenance
of Funding for Headspace Mid
10 Director Environment and Planning Report
10.1 Outstanding
DA's >12 months, applications where submissions received & not
determined 26 May 2009
10.2 Report
on the release of Bonds for Macs'con PTY LTD
10.3 Aboriginal
Community Advisory Committee AGM
10.4 Aboriginal
Community Advisory Committee Meeting
10.5 Report
on the request for nominations to Joint Regional Planning Panels
10.6 Naidoc
Week - 5 July to 12 July 2009
11 Director Engineering Services Report
11.1 Road
Naming -
11.2 Mid
North Weight of Loads Membership - Agreement 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010
11.3 DA 2007/800 Pacey Street Construction
12 General Manager's Summary of Items to be
Discussed in Closed Meeting
12.1 Employment
Lands Strategy
It is recommended
that the Council resolve into closed session with the press and public excluded
to allow consideration of this item, as provided for under Section 10A(2) (c)
of the Local Government Act, 1993, on the grounds that the report contains
information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person
with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
12.2 Tender
T003/2009 - Management and Operation of Macksville Memorial Aquatic Centre
It is recommended
that the Council resolve into closed session with the press and public excluded
to allow consideration of this item, as provided for under Section 10A(2) (d)
of the Local Government Act, 1993, on the grounds that the report contains
commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i)
prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer
a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade
secret.
12.3 Lease
of Shop
It is recommended
that the Council resolve into closed session with the press and public excluded
to allow consideration of this item, as provided for under Section 10A(2) (d)
of the Local Government Act, 1993, on the grounds that the report contains
commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i)
prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer
a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade
secret.
12.4 Re-submitted - Council Owned Buildings for
Public Use - Essential Fire Measures
It is recommended
that the Council resolve into closed session with the press and public excluded
to allow consideration of this item, as provided for under Section 10A(2) (d)
of the Local Government Act, 1993, on the grounds that the report contains
commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed (i)
prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it; or (ii) confer
a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or (iii) reveal a trade
secret.
a Questions raised by Councillors at 8 above
i MOTION TO CLOSE THE MEETING
ii PUBLIC VERBAL REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING
PROPOSAL
TO
CLOSE
iii CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC REPRESENTATIONS
iv DEAL WITH MOTION TO CLOSE THE MEETING
13 MEETING CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC
14 REVERT TO OPEN MEETING FOR DECISIONS IN RELATION TO
ITEMS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED MEETING.
4 June
2009 |
Notice of Motion
ITEM 5.1 SF1269 040609 Notice of Motion - Pedestrian Crossing -
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: John Ainsworth, Councillor
Summary: The elderly and
people with a disability wishing to cross A pedestrian
crossing at the top end of Even though
traffic in the Macksville CBD is 50 kph this is still considered very fast
particularly for the elderly. A 40 kph
speed limit is recommended and in keeping with traffic conditions in |
1 That Council approve the installation
of a pedestrian crossing on 2 That Council request the Traffic
Committee to investigate the introduction of 40 kph speed limit on |
OPTIONS:
That Council not approve
the installation of a pedestrian crossing.
That Council not agree
with the Traffic Committee investigating the introduction of 40 kph speed
limit.
DISCUSSION:
Elderly people in
particular find it difficult and unsafe to cross
A local resident, has
written to Council requesting the installation of a pedestrian crossing and a drop
in the speed limit to 40 kph in the Macksville CBD, in keeping with that
provided in Bowra Street Nambucca Heads. Copy of letter is attached.
Our Shire has many
elderly residents and if Council is promoting shopping locally then it needs to
take into consideration of the aged and disabled community.
CONSULTATION:
There has been no
further consultation.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There is no implication on the environment.
Social
A pedestrian crossing in the vicinity of the Supermarket on
Economic
Better access to shopping on both sides of
Risk
The risk to Council may be that if these requests are ignored Council may
be liable in the case of an accident caused to fast flowing traffic and no
pedestrian crossing.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
Not known.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
Not known.
MANEX
COMMENT
A pedestrian crossing in the vicinity of the
supermarket greatly impacts on parking spaces in
The views of organisations such as the
Macksville and District Chamber of Commerce and Industry should be sought.
A 40 kph zone in a commercial area such as
the one in Bowra Street Nambucca Heads is a “High Pedestrian Zone” and requires
overall consideration of the affected street as slowing devices such as speed
humps are often required at the start points.
1View |
9695/2009
Letter from Shirley Sanders |
|
2View |
12832/2009
Map of |
|
Ordinary Council Meeting - 4 June 2009 Notice of Motion -
Pedestrian Crossing - |
Attachment
1 9695/2009 Letter from Shirley Sanders |
Ordinary Council Meeting - 4 June 2009 Notice of Motion -
Pedestrian Crossing - |
Attachment
2 12832/2009 Map of |
4 June
2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.1 SF959 040609 Outstanding
Actions and Reports March 2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
Summary: The following table is a report
on all outstanding resolutions and questions from Councillors (except
development consents, development control plans & local environmental
plans). Matters which are simply noted or received, together with resolutions
adopting rates, fees and charges are not listed as outstanding actions. Where
matters have been actioned they are indicated with |
That the list of outstanding
actions and reports be noted and received for information by Council. |
No |
FILE
NO |
COUNCIL MEETING |
SUMMARY OF MATTER |
ACTION BY |
STATUS |
SEPTEMBER
2007 |
JUNE 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||
1 |
SF793 |
05/06/08 |
|
DES |
David Mitchell has spoken to local
commercial operators re Council concern. Request for feedback sought from Kempsey
Shire Council on the Professional Fishermen’s Permit Scheme. Minister’s representative considering
Council’s comment on a legislated Code of Conduct. Season is late this year, expected late
May. The Department of Primary
Industries will respond to any issues.
The Department of Primary Industries will be issuing guidelines that
include the beach signs. Floods have impacted on this year’s
season. Mullet prices are low. Likely to be little impact this year. |
||||||||||||
JULY 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||
2 |
Item
9.9 |
03/07/08 |
Council make representation to
Minister for Lands seeking agreed compensation for subdivision of Reserve
91694 |
GM |
Letter sent 15/07/08. Follow up letter sent 14/11/2008. Minister for Lands has advised by letter
dated 8/1/09 that land will be made available to Council as per the agreement
following finalisation of an Aboriginal Land Claim. Follow up letter sent 9 April. |
||||||||||||
3 |
Item
11.4 |
03/07/08 |
That a new plan of management
be prepared for Farringdon Playing Fields |
DES |
Funding declined. Work on preparing plan to be scheduled. Interested parties will need to identify
potential uses for inclusion in revised plan of management. Local cricket and soccer associations to
be contacted regarding use of the fields. |
||||||||||||
OCTOBER 2008 |
|
||||||||||||||||
4 |
RF256 |
16/10/08 |
Notice of
Motion - Riverbank Erosion - |
DES |
Subject to GHD undertaking evaluation. Separate assessments underway for: 1 Riverside Drive Bank Stability: Jason Cottages. Report received. Awaiting further survey. GHD doing final review of
report. Letter sent requiring report by 12 June 09 4 Catchment Assessment: Report being prepared by GHD. |
|
|||||||||||
NOVEMBER
2008 |
|
||||||||||||||||
5 |
SF544 |
6/11/08 |
Council review biennial the
Community Infrastructure and Infrastructure Needs Study and review annually
the Section 94 Community Facilities and Open Space Contributions Plan Works
Schedule. |
GM |
Report November 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
6 |
SF42 |
20/11/08 |
That Council receive a report
back on the Dept. of Local Government Circular 08-61 – Plumbing Inspections
by Council. |
DEP |
16 April 2009 Matter deferred as AIBS and DEPA are
currently investigating the consequences of this circular. |
|
|||||||||||
DECEMBER 2008 |
|
||||||||||||||||
7 |
SF688 |
4/12/08 |
That
during the first half of the 2009/10 year Council call for community input
into a new Environmental Levy program for the 5 year period to the end of
2014/2015. |
DEP |
Programmed for
September 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
8 |
|
18/12/08 |
That Council
seek the agreement of the tenderers to an extended evaluation period which
will conclude on 30 June 2009. |
GM |
MIT consulting
with tenderers. Tender evaluation to
occur April/May 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
9 |
SF1046 |
18/12/08 |
That
the Wellington Drive component of the Urban Design Strategy be deferred
pending a further report to Council in relation to further studies re land
slip, rising sea level and traffic/parking. |
DEP |
Report March
2009. Deferred in
Draft Budget. 16 April 2009
meeting. Deferred until
draft Nambucca River Master Plan prepared. |
|
|||||||||||
JANUARY 2009 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
11 |
PRF53 |
15/01/09 |
Preparation
of landscape design for |
DES |
Quotations
being sought. Late March. Deferred to May
2009. Deferred to
June 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
12 |
PRF53 |
15/01/09 |
DES
to enquire with Department of Public Works about opportunities to remove or
refurbish the river gauging station in |
DES |
Letter sent to
the Manly Hydraulics Laboratory. The Dept of
Commerce have advised that Council in 1981 raised no objection to the
Department of Public Works proposal to install an automatic recorder after
consideration of the approximate location and type of structure, The site is
important because of the consistency with historical data. An alternative
building or structure must still use the same site. Letter sent re
standard of building required. |
|
|||||||||||
FEBRUARY 2009 |
|
||||||||||||||||
13 |
SF241 |
5/02/09 |
That
a new plan of management for the reserve within Kingsworth Estate be prepared
by DES. To include pedestrian and
vehicular access arrangements and management of environmental values. |
DES |
October 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
14 |
SF869 |
19/02/09 |
Council
write to Country Energy concerning energy being wasted with street lighting
at the Pearl Estate off the |
DES |
DES to meet
Country Energy to discuss further. |
|
|||||||||||
15 |
SF1031 |
19/02/09 |
That
a report be brought to Council on its capacity to keep electronic information
long term and in a fail safe condition. |
GM |
MIT to report
in July 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
MARCH 2009 |
|
||||||||||||||||
16 |
SF1297 |
5/03/09 |
That
Council make representations to the DECC and RFS re requirements for bushfire
asset protection zones around houses. |
DEP |
Letters to be
prepared and sent. Letters sent 16
March 2009. Response from
DECC received (see attached). |
|
|||||||||||
17 |
DA09/049 |
5/03/09 |
The
RTA be requested to revise the speed limit along the |
DES |
Letter sent. No response as
at 24 March 2009. RTA advised 6
April 2009 that they will review and advise Council of outcome. |
|
|||||||||||
18 |
DA09/061 |
5/03/09 |
That
Council review the Carparking Section 94 plan for Nambucca Heads.. |
GM |
Target report
to Council in July 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
19 |
SF1269 |
5/03/09 |
That
Council investigate the purchase of privately owned industrial land adjoining
the Macksville industrial estate. |
GM |
Cost of
feasibility study being investigated. Report
by April 2009. Quotes being
obtained from consultants. Report May
2009. Chasing up quotes. See item in
confidential business paper 4/6/09 |
|
|||||||||||
20 |
SF791 |
19/03/09 |
Proposed
sale of old |
GM |
Report to next
Land Development Committee meeting. |
|
|||||||||||
21 |
SF791 |
19/03/09 |
That
a report go back to the Land Development Committee on the outcome of
advertising for expressions of interest for the purchase and development of
industrial land in Nambucca Heads. |
GM |
Report to come
back following advertising. |
|
|||||||||||
22 |
SF1301 |
19/03/09 |
Council
hold 1 workshop for Section 355 Committees to explain information package and
to discuss any issues or concerns the Committees may have in relation to
their operations. |
GM |
Workshop being
organised for 5.00pm Wednesday 3 June 2009. Letters sent to
Committees 6 May 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
APRIL 2009 |
|
||||||||||||||||
24 |
SF939 |
2/04/09 |
Views
of Chambers of Commerce, Nambucca Valley Tourism and High Schools be sought
as to proposed marketing slogan and billboards and alternative suggestions |
GM |
To be reported back in August 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
25 |
SF871 |
16/04/09 |
That the future of the Pioneer
Community Centre be subject to a further report to Council in 3 months time
following receipt of any proposal from the CoM to retain the building. Also Council seek the flat be
vacated and obtain insurance details. |
GM |
Report in August
2009. Letter sent 20/4/09 to CoM
requesting that the flat be vacated and requesting insurance details. Committee of Management
wish to be provided with reasons as to why the flat should be vacated (verbal
advice to GM on 22/5/09). |
|
|||||||||||
26 |
SF959 |
16/04/09 |
Sub-Committee continue a
review of Draft Management Plan so that it can be presented to Council in
March 2010. |
GM |
A report is to be
prepared to the Sub-Committee on a staged process for reviewing the Draft
Management Plan. Report to be
completed by June 2009. Subcommittee
to report by March 2010. |
|
|||||||||||
27 |
SF1305 |
16/04/09 |
Council make representations
to the Minister for Emergency Services and Minister for Roads to seek funding
for the repair of landslips in Nambucca Heads which occurred as a consequence
of the flood events in February and March 2009. Also that Council make representations to
the Insurance Council for the provision of insurance for land slip damage. |
GM |
Letters sent 21
April 2009. Follow-up letter
sent 28 May 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
28 |
SF1075 |
16/04/09 |
That Council seek a legal
opinion on how it should advise the effect of the NSW Government Policy
Statement on sea level rise under question 7 on a planning certificate and
also specific advice as to a disclaimer. |
DEP |
Letter sent to
Deacons on 20 April 2009. Response expected
by 22 May 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
28 |
RF477 |
16/04/09 |
That Council write to |
DES |
Letter of request
forwarded on 1 May 2009. Date set for 2.00
pm on 28 June 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
30 |
SF444 |
16/04/09 |
That the revised road
hierarchy plan, incorporating a grading program be deferred to the next GPC
meeting with Councillors to provide any comments to Acting DES within 7 days. |
DES |
Report to GPC 17
June 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
MAY 2009 |
|
||||||||||||||||
32 |
SF959 |
07/05/09 |
That the report concerning
Wia-Ora sand and gravel quarry consider options for calling in bonds to
undertake works. |
DEP |
To be reported 21
May 2009. Deferred to June
2009 to enable all options to be considered. See item in
business paper 4/6/2009. |
|
|||||||||||
33 |
SF639 |
07/05/09 |
That the staffing of the
Department of Environment and Planning be reviewed in 6 months or upon
resignation of any professional staff member, whichever occurs first. |
GM |
Report November
2009 |
|
|||||||||||
34 |
SF639 |
07/05/09 |
Council receive a report
relating to the need for administrative support across the organisation. |
GM |
July 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
35 |
SF21 |
07/05/09 |
Council investigate the
implementation and costs of an effluent management system at the saleyards |
GM |
August 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
36 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Allocation for retaining wall
at Little Beach be deferred for consideration at the September Quarterly
Review |
DES |
November 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
37 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Council consider a report on
the operation of the saleyards as a business unit and what, if any, subsidy
is to be applied to its operations. |
GM |
November 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
38 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Council review the cycleway
plan so as to ensure its funding requirements are realistic. |
DES |
December 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
39 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Council receive a report on
the funding and use of the reserves for the Council Chambers Upkeep, Self
Insurance and Tourist Centre Upkeep. |
GM |
September 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Letter of offer
sent to Minister for Education on 25 May 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
41 |
SF1269 |
21/05/09 |
Council write to Parliamentary
Secretary for Roads seeking assurance that the |
DES |
Letter sent 28
May 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
42 |
SF1261 |
21/05/09 |
That Council undertake an
onsite inspection of DA2009/127 (McDonalds) once the plans have been
finalised. |
DEP |
|
|
|||||||||||
43 |
SF820 |
21/05/09 |
That the draft tree planting
program for 2009/10 be referred to Council for its consideration. |
DES |
Report July 2009 |
|
|||||||||||
53 |
DA 2007/244 |
21/05/09 |
That there be a report to the
GPC on Section 138 Roads Act issues including damage to footpaths and other
matters. |
DEP |
Report to July
2009 GPC |
|
|||||||||||
44 |
SF1231 |
21/05/09 |
Use of Road Reserves and
public land for commercial, community and charitable activities – that there
be a further report to consider items 1-6 in the letter from the Chamber of
Commerce. |
DEP |
Report in August
2009. Meeting scheduled
for 5.00 pm 16 June 2009 with Chambers of Commerce. |
|
|||||||||||
45 |
SF452 |
21/05/09 |
Council seek from the Minister
for the Environment acceptance that the sampling data for the old landfill
indicate down stream impacts are minimal and re-installation of the leachate
interception trench is not justifiable. |
DES |
Local DECC office
advised by letter of Council’s intention. Formal proposal
for Minister being prepared. |
|
|||||||||||
46 |
SF452 |
21/05/09 |
Council consider the provision
of additional monitoring bores at the landfill with a report on the cost for
installation and monitoring. |
DES |
Report to July
2009. |
|
|||||||||||
47 |
QWN256 |
21/05/09 |
Thank you to Ray Hadley re
Thistle Park when matter with Dept of Education has been finalised |
GM |
Letter of offer
sent to Minister of Education sent 25 May 2009. |
|
|||||||||||
1View |
12182/2009
Item 16 - Response letter from DECC |
|
Ordinary Council Meeting - 4 June 2009 Outstanding Actions and
Reports March 2009 |
Attachment
1 12182/2009 Item 16 - Response letter from DECC |
4 June 2009 |
General Manager's
Report
ITEM 9.2 SF706 040609 Grant
Application Status Report - 4 June 2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Jenny
Chance, Grants Officer
Summary: At Council’s meeting on 7 December 2006 it was resolved that there be a quarterly return submitted to Council on grant programs. |
That the list of grant programs and their status to
25 May 2009 be received. |
APPROVED GRANTS—SECURED BY GRANTS OFFICER
Grant |
Funding Amount |
Description |
NSW Maritime – Maritime Infrastructure Program |
$53,220 |
Pontoon
and Gangway at Pontoon
and Gangway at |
NSW Blackspot
Program |
$34,000 |
Pedestrian refuge at |
Department of Families, Housing,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs – Volunteers Grants Program |
$11,179 |
Nambucca
District Little Athletics – Computer, camera and filing cabinets. Nambucca
Heads Junior Nambucca
Heads Touch Football – Computer and a photocopier. |
NSW Attorney
General’s Department – NSW Crime Prevention Grant |
$54,527 |
Program to assist licensed premises to implement strategies
towards a safer environment for women. |
Department of
Planning - NSW Coastline Cycleway Grants
Program |
$75,000 |
Funding
for shared pedestrian/cycleway along |
Department of
Climate Change – Local Adaptation Pathways Program |
$140,000 |
Funding
to assist |
Department of Sport
and Recreation – Capital Assistance Program |
$8,600 |
Nambucca
Tennis Club lighting upgrade. |
TOTAL |
$376,526 |
|
SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS
|
Grant Program |
Action |
Grant Details and Status |
|
1 |
Department of Community Services
(NSW) – Area Assistance Scheme Funding basis: Fully Funded up to $110,000 Opens: Applications Submitted Closed: 10 October
2008 Outcome: Successful applications to be announced mid 2009 Grant 1:$45,000 Grant 2:$110,000 Grant 3:$30,700 Grant 4:$24,761 |
GO |
The Area Assistance Scheme (AAS) is a regional community
development program run by the Communities Division, NSW Department of
Community Services. The AAS provides grants to local Councils and
non-government not-for-profit organisations for projects that improve
community well being and how communities function. The AAS works within a
whole-of-government framework to deliver its outcomes. In 2008/09 the AAS
will funds project between $10 000 and $110 000. Council submitted or assisted in the following applications: 1) Argents Hill Hall – Improvements to hall including
general maintenance and structural works. 2) 3) Warrell Creek Hall – Improvements to hall including
insulating part of the building and adding exhaust fans, new floor coverings
in kitchen, refurbishing of stage area, fencing and boundary restoration
works, new footpath, water tank, installation of alarm device for the septic
overflow tank, new bbq, shade area and picnic tables. 4) Unkya Reserve – Improvements including new |
|
2 |
Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and
Indigenous Affairs – Volunteers Grants Program Funding basis: Fully Funded up to $5,000 Opens: Applications Submitted Closed: 19 October
2008 Outcome: Applications 1, 2 and 3 Successful, Application 4 Unsuccessful Grant 1:$3,030 Council contribution: $0.00 Grant 2:$4,950 Grant 3:$ 3,199 Grant 4:$ 4,990 |
GO |
Eligible organisations can apply for grant funding ranging from a
minimum of $1,000 up to a maximum of $5,000. An organisation applying for a grant
under the Volunteer Grants Program 2008 must be an Australian, not-for-profit
organisation that is a legal entity, engaging
volunteers, whose work directly benefits Australian communities. Council assisted with four applications: 1) Nambucca District Little Athletics –
Funding to purchase computer, camera and filing cabinets. 2) Nambucca Heads Junior Rugby League
Football Club – Funding to purchase a coffee maker and a step ladder. 3) Nambucca Heads Touch Football – Funding
to purchase a computer and a photocopier 4) E J Biffin Playing Fields - Funding to
purchase a ride-on-mower |
3 |
NSW Sport and Recreation –
Capital Assistance Program Funding basis: 1:1 basis Opens: Application Submitted Closed: 14 November 2008 Outcome:
Successful applications to be announced Mid 2009 Grant 1:$8,600 Grant 2:$21,000 Grant 3:$30,000 Grant 4:$14,341 |
GO/ MBS |
NSW Sport and Recreation (the Agency) offers the Capital
Assistance Program for the development of local level facilities with the
maximum grant available being $30,000. Eligible applicants are those from local government Council assisted with four applications: 1) Nambucca Tennis Club –
Lighting Upgrade 2) Macksville Tennis Club –
Court surface upgrade 3) Nambucca Valley Bridge Club
– Funding towards new club house. 4) Scotts Head Bowling and
Recreation Club – Installation of lights at |
4 |
Department of Local Government –
Playground Upgrades Funding basis: Fully Funded up to $20,000 Opens: Application Submitted Closed: 21 November 2008 Outcome:
Successful
applications announcement date yet to be advised Grant: $20,000.00 |
GO/ MBS |
A total of $2 million has been made available over two years.
Round 1 grants for 2008/09 have been allocated and The grants will only be available for local government and must
be used to either provide new playground facilities and/or equipment or
upgrade existing playground facilities and/or equipment. Councils must
utilise grants received for playground projects on land which is All An application was submitted to install border and
softfall to |
5 |
NSW
Department of Planning – NSW Coastline Cycleway Grants Program Funding basis: 1:1 Opens: Application Submitted Closed: 19 December 2008 Outcome:
Successful
$75,000 approved Grant 1:$128,250 |
GO/ MTS |
This program provides grants to
non-metropolitan coastal Application submitted for shared
pedestrian/cycleway along |
6 |
Local Adaptation Pathway Program Grant
– Round 2 - Expression of Interest Funding basis: Fully Funded Opens: Successful Closed: 25 February 2009 Outcome:
Successful
applications announcement date yet to be advised Grant: $140,000 |
GO/ ECO/ SP |
Through the
Local Adaptation Pathways Program, the Australian Government is providing
funding to help Worth up to
$500,000, Round 2 of the Local Adaptation Pathways Program seeks to
complement and build on the work from Round 1. While all applications will be
considered, this round of funding seeks to improve participation from local
governments in Outer Regional, Remote and Very Remote regions. Consortia of For Round 2, the
Program will provide local governments with grants of up to: · $75,000 (GST exclusive) for a single Council · $120,000 (GST exclusive) for two (2) Councils · $140,000 (GST exclusive) for three (3) or more
Councils. The funding will
help A joint
application has been submitted from Nambucca Shire Council, Kempsey Shire
Council and Bellingen Shire Council.
Further information has been submitted upon request of the Department. |
7 |
National Emergency Volunteer Support Fund – Emergency Management Funding basis: Fully Funded Opens:
Application Submitted Closing: 6
March 2009 Outcome: Successful applications announcement date
yet to be advised Grant:
$150,000 |
GO |
The National
Emergency Volunteer Support Fund focuses on emergency management volunteers
in recognition of their needs and the significant front line role they play
in reducing vulnerability and enhancing community safety. To ensure ongoing
protection of communities it is critical that all volunteer agencies maintain
their current levels of staffing and training. The Australian
Government is offering funding in 2009/10 through the National Emergency
Volunteer Support Fund for projects which specifically address the
recruitment, retention and training of volunteers. Application submitted by Nambucca River
Volunteer Marine Rescue Squad. |
8 |
Country Halls Renewal Fund Funding basis: 2:1 Opens:
Currently Open Closing: Always
Open Outcome: Grant 1: $TBA Grant 2: $12,754.13 Grant 3:: $17,052.00 |
GO |
$2.5 million over 5 years towards renewing
country halls. The fund will be delivered by the Office of Rural Affairs. Applications are currently being prepared
for: 1) Argents Hill Hall – Repairs 2) Nambucca Entertainment Centre –
External painting 3) Taylors Arm Hall – Kitchen, flooring
and windows Notice of the
program has been distributed to the Committees of Management for the halls |
9 |
Norman
Wettenhall Foundation Funding basis: Fully Funded
up to $10,000 Opens:
Application Submitted Closing: 31
March 2009 Outcome: Successful applications announcement date
yet to be advised Grant 1: $10,000 |
GO |
Support is given
to projects that enhance or maintain the vitality and diversity of the
Australian natural living environment. The objectives
of the Foundation are: · to build capacity in local communities to effect
long-term beneficial change in the natural environment · to support and encourage research into, and
monitoring of, all aspects of · to support education relating to our natural
environment · Principles Wherever possible, funded projects will: · be innovative and serve as a model for future projects · show collaboration with other groups,
particularly community groups · result in long term improvement of the natural
environment · indicate clearly, and thoughtfully, how advice of
the project's outcomes will be shared Pre-approval
to lodge a submission has been received for funding towards seating and
signage for the Crosswinds Wetlands Reserve.
An application has been submitted. |
10 |
The Department of Infrastructure,
Transport, Regional Development and Local Government – Indigenous Road Safety
Grants Funding basis: Fully funded
up to $30,000 Opens:
Application Submitted Closing: 27
March 2009 Outcome: Grant: $30,000 |
|
The Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government is now inviting applications for Indigenous Road Safety Grants for 2009-2010. One or more grants up to a total of $30,000 will be awarded to applicants for projects that will help improve road safety for Indigenous people. Application forms and detailed information about the grants are available from the Department’s website. Objectives The grant is offered as a means to: · encourage innovative and worthwhile initiatives to help reduce road trauma affecting Indigenous people; and · increase the range of initiatives available to address road safety for Indigenous people. An application
has been prepared to fund engineering works, informative signage at |
11 |
Department of
Environment and Climate Change – NSW Climate Change Fund – Public Facilities
Program Funding basis: Fully funded Opens:
Application prepared Closing: 30
April 2009 Outcome: TBA Grant: $463,515 Council contribution: $14,040
(in-kind) |
GO |
$30m for water and energy saving projects in facilities
open to the public eg schools, community buildings, sporting facilities,
museums and art galleries. Eligibility criteria Applications are open to providers of non-profit public
or educational facilities for projects which: § publicly demonstrate how water and/or energy savings can
work § stimulate investment in innovative ways to save, harvest
and recycle water and/or reduce overall energy consumption (and related
greenhouse emissions) and/or peak electricity demand. Activities which are eligible for funding under the
Public Facilities Program include, but are not limited to: § education activities which have the potential to increase
the adoption of efficient technologies and practices § projects which improve the efficiency of buildings and
appliances § projects which reduce peak electricity demand § projects which reduce the demand for electricity or water
supplied from electricity or water supply networks, e.g. cogeneration,
fuel An application submitted for funding towards lighting and
air conditioning system upgrade in Council’s |
12 |
Australian
Government – Caring for our Country funding Funding basis: Fully funded Opens:
Application submitted Closing: 6
March 2009 Outcome: TBA Grant: $100,000 |
GO |
Caring for our Country funding The Australian
Government is now calling for investment proposals for projects that will
meet the targets outlined in the Caring for our Country business plan
2009-10. Caring for our Country is an Australian Government initiative that
seeks to achieve an environment that is healthy, better protected, well
managed and resilient, and provides essential ecosystem services in a
changing climate. The Australian Government is seeking
investment proposals for landscape-scale projects that achieve one or more
targets in specific geographic locations or key assets. Projects can be large, medium
or small: · large-scale projects in the
order of $20 million over four years · medium-scale projects of up to
$3 million per annum (a value of $2-3 million would be expected for most
medium-scale projects) · small-scale projects of between
$20,000 and $100,000 per annum. Council is working together with Landcare to
submit an application that includes weed removal, field days, workshops and
other on ground works and will involve a small devolved grant scheme for land
owners and community groups. |
13 |
Local Infrastructure Support Fund – Building the Country Package – Department of State and Regional
Development – Expression of Interest Funding basis: Fully Funded Opens:
Application submitted Closing: 20
March 2009 Outcome: TBA Grant: $100,000 |
GO |
$52 million over 5 years supporting
infrastructure projects that are directly linked to economic development
opportunities. The fund will be delivered by the Department of State and
Regional Development. Application
submitted for infrastructure works at Macksville Saleyards. |
14 |
NRMA – Community Grants Program Funding basis: Fully funded
up to $5,000 Opens:
Application submitted Closing: 25
March 2009 Outcome: TBA Grant 1: $4,998 Grant 2: $5,000 |
|
The Community Grants Program provides funding to
support community and not for profit organisations that are making our
communities safer, particularly in the areas of crime prevention, road
safety, emergency readiness and response, and the environment. 1) Funding towards solar hot water system at EJ
Biffin Fields 2) Funding towards production of brochure for
Crosswinds |
15 |
Jobs Fund Funding basis: Fully funded Opens:
Application submitted Closing: 22 May
2009 Outcome: TBA Grant 1: $4,500,000 Grant 2: $441,350 |
|
The Jobs Fund is a $650 million Australian Government initiative to support and create jobs and increase skills through innovative projects that build community infrastructure and increase social capital in local communities across the country. Through the Jobs Fund the Government will invest in one-off capital projects and provide seed funding for social enterprises. The Jobs Fund is a temporary resource. The aim of the Jobs Fund is to produce long-term improvements in communities affected by the global economic downturn. The Jobs Fund projects will focus on directly generating jobs for people in communities with already high unemployment levels, rising jobless rates or which are particularly vulnerable. 1) Funding towards Nambucca Sewerage Treatment Plant upgrade 2)
Funding towards cycleway in |
|
Environmental Restoration and Rehabilitation Grants Funding basis: Fully Funded
up to $100,000 Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 29 May 2009 Outcome: TBA Grant: $100,000 |
|
The aim of the
Restoration and Rehabilitation (R&R) program is to facilitate projects to
prevent or reduce pollution, the waste stream or environmental degradation of
any kind, run by community organisations and State and Local government
organisations. Through these projects, we also aim to improve the capacity of
communities and organisations to protect, restore and enhance the
environment. The Objectives of the Environmental Restoration
and Rehabilitation Program are: to restore degraded environmental resources, including rare and endangered ecosystems to protect important ecosystems and habitats of rare and endangered flora and fauna to prevent or minimize future environmental damage to enhance the quality of specific environmental resources to improve the capacity of eligible organisations to protect, restore and enhance the environment to undertake resource recovery and waste avoidance projects and to prevent and/or reduce pollution. Application currently being prepared for Macksville Saleyards |
FUNDING PROGRAMS RECENTLY OPENED OR SOON TO
BE RELEASED — FOR INFORMATION
|
Grant Program |
Action |
Status |
1 |
Building the Country Package Funding basis: Various Opens:
Currently Open Closing:
Various |
|
Building the Country Package announced by
the Rees Government. The funding programs are designed to
support people who live and work in country areas. |
2 |
Country Passenger Transport Infrastructure Grants
Scheme (CPTIGS) – Ministry of Transport Funding basis: Fully Funded Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 25 June 09 |
|
The Country Passenger Transport Infrastructure Grants Scheme (CPTIGS) is administered by the Ministry of Transport. It provides support funding to improve the amenity of passenger transport infrastructure in rural, regional and remote communities of NSW Who Can Apply? Local government, incorporated community organisations, transport operators and other interested organisations that have a current Australian Business Number are eligible. |
3 |
Arts NSW – Project Funding Funding basis: Various Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 6 July 2009 |
|
Project Funding
through application All eligible applicants can apply for
Project Funding through the application process set out in the 2010 Arts
Funding Program Guidelines. Funding is offered for four specific purposes: Capital – A contribution of up to 50 per cent
towards the development of arts and cultural infrastructure that increases
access to purpose-designed and well-managed facilities, including
multi-purpose facilities and hubs. up to $100,000 but funding
up to $250,000 may be considered in exceptional circumstances; Creation and/or Presentation – Support for any stage in the creative development and/or
public presentation of arts and cultural work. – up to $30,000 for a creative development,
or – up to $30,000 for a public
presentation, or – up to $60,000 for an application
including both creative development and public presentation; Performing Arts Touring – Support for greater access to professional performing arts
programs throughout NSW. No limit; Strategic
Industry Development – Support for projects with
sustainable long-term outcomes for the development of the arts and cultural
industry in NSW. Up to $50,000 per annum. |
4 |
Regional Arts Fund Funding basis: 1:1 Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 14 August 2009 |
|
Categories for the Regional Arts Fund include: 1 New Initiatives This category assists groups to undertake projects in any art form that: extend knowledge, participation and/or development of arts and culture within communities; address cultural themes or issues of significance in local communities; are initiated by and with the community; provide opportunities for collaboration and skills development of locally based arts workers. 2 Partnerships This category assists groups to undertake projects in any art form that: assist in the development of sustainable cultural networks; promote partnerships that support community and cultural exchange; have long-term arts and community cultural development outcomes for communities; are initiated by and with the community. Partnerships can be with the non-arts sectors and specific target groups either within communities, between towns, within regions or across the state. Each partner must fulfill the eligibility criteria. It is expected that each partner contributes equally to the project through skills, financial and / or in-kind assistance. Priority will be given to projects that identify and create new partnerships and projects in which the partnerships are important in promoting sustainability. |
For Council’s
information, as at 25 May 2009, the Grants Officer has applied for 45 grants
totalling $9,363,529. Of that total
Council has been notified that grants in the amount of $376,526 have been successfully approved. The remainder are still to be determined.
There are no attachments for this report.
4 June
2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.3 SF1333 040609 Debriefing on 31 March/1 April Flood Event
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter, General Manager
Summary: There has been a
debriefing on Council’s response to the flood event on 31 March/1 April
2009. Some issues were identified in
relation to communication with the Mayor; the publicising of road closures
and openings; working hours; environmental issues arising out of the clean up
and the disposal of flood debris at the Waste Depot. |
1 That Council request
that the Department of Environment and Climate Change and other Departments associated with flood
emergencies agree on a protocol for emergency clean up work. 2 That the General
Manager’s Delegations of Authority be amended to allow fee exemptions for the disposal of waste arising
out of natural disasters such as floods,
storms and bushfires. |
OPTIONS:
Council has options in
how it responds to emergencies, both during and immediately after the
event. Where the Displan (Local Disaster
Plan) is activated there is a more structured response. This report concerns recent flood events
which did not require the activation of the Displan.
DISCUSSION:
On 18 May the Mayor,
General Manager, Director Engineering Services, Senior Overseer and the
Engineering Services Executive Assistant met to discuss a number of issues
which arose out of the flood event on 31 March/1 April 2009. The matters discussed and the conclusions
reached were as follows.
Communication with Mayor
Unlike the situation in
the
In such emergencies
where the Local Emergency Management Committee has not been convened it is
proposed that those Council staff directly involved in relief efforts, and
particularly the Senior Overseer, communicate directly with the Mayor in
relation to the status of the emergency and the relief work.
Announcing Road
Closures/Openings
The agency responsible
for closing and opening roads is responsible for publicising the fact. Whilst it is generally Council undertaking
these procedures, this is not always the case.
Part way through the emergency it was identified that there was no
readily accessible information on the status of roads and bridges and which
were closed or open. At that stage the
Executive Assistant undertook to place information on the status of roads and
bridges on the front page of Council’s website.
This was a great initiative and organised at very short notice. However it was agreed that back up assistance
from other Executive Assistants would be required to manage incoming phone
calls from residents, as well as from the SES and Council staff whilst the
posting of new information to the website took place.
Occupational Health and
Safety Issues – Working Hours
It was agreed that all
staff involved in the emergency need to be aware of not exceeding continuous
working hours without the required break.
Environmental Issues in
Clean Up
In undertaking work to
open bridges, roads and in emergency clean up, there were complaints directed
at Council staff for ignoring environmental legislation. In particular, to open
Silt which has been
deposited on roads and bridges is also hosed off by the Fire Brigade at the
request of Council and also by residents.
Given the turbidity of a
flooded river it may be argued that such emergency work does not constitute
pollution, however it would be desirable for the Department of Environment and
Climate Change and other associated Departments such as Fisheries to agree on a
protocol for emergency clean up works.
Lack of “Ownership” of
Rivers
There are matters
concerning the river, responsibility for which seems to fall between the
organisations which have regulatory involvement. An example is the removal of dead cows from
waterways and beaches. Another is the
removal of flood debris including plastic drums and trays from oyster leases as
well as logs and vegetation from beaches.
Where there is a natural disaster declaration such clean up works will
be funded, however it is unclear who is responsible for the work. As Council is the authority with the most
local staff it is recommended that it oversee such work in consultation with
the Waterways Authority who are responsible for navigation.
Disposal of Flood Debris
at Waste Depot
Following the February
flood, the General Manager permitted residents to deposit flood debris at the
waste depot at no charge. The fee
exemption was subject to an assessment by Council’s Waste Management Officer of
the debris to be removed and a voucher being provided for the quantity of
material to be deposited. This worked
satisfactorily and was also applied for the clean up of the March/April flood.
It is recommended that
the General Manager’s Delegations of Authority be amended to permit this
practice.
CONSULTATION:
There has been
consultation with the Mayor, Senior Overseer, Director Engineering Services,
and Engineering Services Executive Assistant.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
The implications for the environment are discussed in the report.
Social
There are social issues caused by isolation. It is important that roads and bridges are
opened as quickly as possible.
Economic
In terms of minimising costs and business recovery it is important that
roads and bridges are opened as quickly as possible.
Risk
There are many risks in dealing with emergencies such as floods. This report considers some of these risks.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
At this stage it is difficult to determine
what impact the flood events will have on Council’s budget. If the natural disaster grant scheme operates
as it should then there should be minimal impact on Council’s budget.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
At this stage there is no impact on working
funds.
There are no
attachments for this report.
4 June
2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.4 SF639 040609 Review of the Tourism Function
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter, General Manager
Summary: Council has been providing staffing assistance to Nambucca Valley
Tourism Inc. to the value of approximately $30,000 per annum for tourism
marketing activities as well as funding of $20,000 per annum. This support for marketing is in addition to the
cost of operating the Visitor Information Centre. The Visitor Information Centre which is
staffed by a part time co-ordinator (21 hours/week) plus 23 regular volunteers
and 8 casual volunteers operates at a net cost to Council of $81,400 per
annum. Council does not have sufficient staff resources to maintain the
staffing assistance for marketing, ie the $30,000 identified above. |
That Nambucca Valley Tourism be advised that Council cannot continue
to provide the previous level of staffing assistance for marketing and that
enquiries for assistance with particular projects be made directly to the
General Manager. |
OPTIONS:
If Council wishes to provide
additional staffing support for tourism, then the source of funding will need
to be identified.
DISCUSSION:
Council has been providing staffing assistance to
Nambucca Valley Tourism Inc. to the value of approximately $30,000 per annum
for tourism marketing activities as well as funding of $20,000 per annum. The work in tourism marketing has arisen
mainly as a consequence of the O’Neill Report which is providing $ for $
funding for 3 years based on approved six monthly marketing strategies. So far two strategies have been prepared. An issue with the additional marketing money
is that both
This support for marketing is in addition to the
cost of operating the Visitor Information Centre. The Visitor Information Centre which is
staffed by a part time Co-ordinator (21 hours/week) plus 23 regular volunteers
and 8 casual volunteers operates at a net cost to Council of $81,400 per annum.
Council does not have sufficient staff resources to
maintain the staffing assistance for marketing, ie the $30,000 identified
above. There is the possibility that
future expenditure will be more focussed at the regional level rather than for
a specific LGA. This would reduce the
required staffing commitment, however Nambucca Valley Tourism should be advised
that the previous level of staffing assistance cannot be maintained.
CONSULTATION:
There has been
consultation with affected staff.
The proposal has been
referred to Nambucca Valley Tourism Inc. for their comment. They have previously advised that Council
should be committing additional resources to tourism promotion and management,
not less.
The central issue is
really about who should be driving tourism marketing in the
It should be noted that
in the Customer Satisfaction Survey conducted in 2007, tourism and tourism
promotion were ranked as activities of low importance and high satisfaction.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no implications for the environment.
Social
There are no social implications.
Economic
The economic implications cannot be readily determined. An evaluation of the benefit of the
additional marketing expenditure provided by the O’Neil report is to be
undertaken.
Risk
There are no particular risks to Councils. The matter concerns the allocation of
resources.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
There will be a budgetary impact if the
existing level of staffing support is maintained as it will require additional
part time or casual staff.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
At this stage there are no implications for
working funds.
4 June
2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.5 SF42 040609 Integrated Planning and Reporting - Release of Draft
Legislation and Mandatory Guidelines
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter, General Manager
Summary: On 11 May 2009, the Department of Local Government released for
comment draft legislation and mandatory “guidelines” for integrated planning
and reporting. In essence given the existing requirements, the new legislation will
require additional planning documents being a Community Strategic Plan and
Resourcing Strategy. As a means of managing
a level of government the legislation is commendable. The Planning and Reporting “Guidelines” and
the Planning and Reporting Manual represent current “best practice”. However at the broadest level, Councils are entitled to ask why their
operations have to be regulated in such great detail. They are an elected level of government
with a very high level of accountability and transparency in their day to day
operations. Whilst the legislation has a desirable emphasis on the financial
sustainability of Councils, it fails to consider what the role of local
government should be. The legislation tends to view the process of strategic planning as
being relatively infrequent and Council will incur additional costs in
amending its plans as a consequence of sudden and unplanned changes in its
operating environment. |
That Council make a submission to the Department of Local Government
in response to the draft legislation and mandatory guidelines concerning the
following matters: 1 The need for clarity
concerning the role of Local Government 2 Querying whether the new
planning and reporting processes have sufficient flexibility to manage major structural change. 3 Querying how the new planning and
reporting requirements will result in, “reduced
red tape and streamlined reporting” (page 3 of Frequently Asked
Questions). 4 That Council nominate to be in Group 3
for the implementation of the new requirements. This will require the adoption of a
Community Strategic Plan by 31 March 2012 and Delivery Program by 30 June
2012. |
OPTIONS:
Council can make a
submission as it sees fit.
As a means of managing a
level of government the legislation is commendable. The Planning and Reporting “Guidelines” and
the Planning and Reporting Manual represent current “best practice”.
However at the broadest
level, Councils are entitled to ask why their operations have to be regulated
in such great detail. They are an
elected level of government with a very high level of accountability and transparency
in their day to day operations.
The Local Government Act
alone runs to 748 sections and many hundreds of pages and this doesn’t include
its Regulations or new mandatory requirements such as those proposed by this
legislation. The new requirements will
add to the perception of excessive “red tape” and compliance costs.
DISCUSSION:
On 11 May 2009, the
Department of Local Government released for comment draft legislation and
mandatory “guidelines” for integrated planning and reporting. A copy of the Minister’s media release, the mandatory
guidelines and frequently asked questions is in the circularised document.
The draft legislation is not attached but can be found on the
Department’s website. There is also a
106 page manual which is not attached but again can be found on the Department’s
website.
The Department is
inviting comment on the draft Bill and Regulation up until 12 June 2009 and the
draft Guidelines and Manual up until 3 July 2009.
The existing Local
Government Act provides that each year, a council is required to adopt a
management plan that sets out its proposed strategy for at least the following
3 years, together with its proposed revenue policy for the next year.
In essence given the
existing requirements, the new legislation will require additional planning documents
being a Community Strategic Plan and Resourcing Strategy. Council has already developed some, but not
all of the requirements for a 10 year Community Strategic Plan as well as the
Resourcing Strategy.
It is planned to
introduce the new requirements in three groups of councils over a three year
period. Councils will be asked to
nominate the group they would like to be in after the legislative changes have
been passed by Parliament as follows:
Group 1: Community Strategic Plan adopted by 31 March 2010
and Delivery Program adopted by 30 June 2010
Group 2: Community Strategic Plan adopted by 31 March
2011 and Delivery Program adopted by 30 June 2011.
Group 3: Community Strategic Plan adopted by 31 March
2012 and Delivery Program adopted by 30 June 2012.
The intent of the
legislation to require Councils to apply a more strategic focus to their
responsibilities and particularly to financial planning and asset management is
laudable. Notwithstanding additional
planning and reporting requirements will come at a cost. With increased planning horizons there is
also the question as to how Councils’ will manage significant change which may
occur in the short term, for example the global financial crisis or proposed water
utility reforms. Such changes may make
the Community Strategic Plan and Delivery Program partially redundant,
requiring on-going review and amendment.
It is proposed that the
following matters be referred to the Department of Local Government for their
consideration.
The Community Strategic
Plan and the Role of Local Government
Whilst the legislation
has a desirable emphasis on the financial sustainability of Councils, it fails
to consider what the role of local government should be in the current fiscal
climate. As an example, the purpose of
the Community Strategic Plan is, “to
identify the community’s main priorities and expectations for the future and to
plan strategies for achieving those goals”. (page 5 of the guidelines)
On page 7 of the
document, “Frequently Asked Questions”, it states as follows:
“The Community Strategic Plan identifies the community’s main priorities
and aspirations for the future, and must address social, environmental,
economic and civic leadership issues. It
may include priorities and aspirations which fall to State or Federal
government agencies or the non-Government sector to meet.”
The mandatory guidelines
also state that, “other partners, such as
State agencies and community groups may also be engaged in delivering the long
term objectives of the plan”. (page 5)
The Manual provides an
example of an objective for the Community Strategic Plan being:
“We want to increase education opportunities in our area”.
Council’s customer
satisfaction survey undertaken in 2007 indicated there is general confusion in
the community as to the role of local government with Council often being
blamed for dissatisfaction with services provided by the State Government.
It is not clear why
Councils should be considering priorities and aspirations for which they are
legally and financially incapable of delivering. Whilst it is not mandatory to consider
functions undertaken by other levels of government, in reality it will be
difficult to exclude them when discussing the community’s general aspirations
and where other Councils incorporate them.
In the terms of the
Allen Report (Independent Inquiry into the Financial Sustainability of NSW
Local Government 2006), this is the maximalist view, that a Council is the
government of its area – concerned with the welfare of the whole community,
even if this means duplicating the roles of other tiers of government.
Adapting to Change
The legislation tends to
view the process of strategic planning as being relatively infrequent. The Planning and Reporting Manual identifies
this problem on page 50 as follows:
“Although Councils and their communities will plan ahead for 10 years,
it is not expected that the plan will be set in stone for that period.
The community will have a chance to revisit the Community Strategic Plan
every four years when its new Council is elected. It may wish to change the priorities or
objectives of the Community Strategic Plan if something significant has
happened during that period, or revise the strategies if a particular course of
action hasn’t proven effective….
It is also possible for the community to change the Community Strategic
Plan within the council term if required, but this should only occur if there
is a fundamental change that affects the whole community. An example might be a natural disaster such
as a major storm, bushfire or flood that severely damages community
infrastructure. Or, there might be a
significant change in the local government area’s boundary.
Community engagement is required whenever significant changes are
proposed to the Community Strategic Plan.
“Significant changes” would be those that require changes to the
objectives of the plan, or the strategies outlined in the plan”.
The community engagement
process is formal consultation process requiring the preparation of a community
engagement strategy. Whilst there is no
standard format for the strategy, it is intended to be a thorough process of
engaging with the community by providing information; seeking information and
involving the community in working through the issues raised.
There is the real
possibility that structural change in local government such as the proposed
water reforms or Council amalgamations will render a significant part of the
plan redundant and impose additional costs for its revision. Unilateral decisions by the State Government
in relation to structural change would also undermine the value of the
engagement process.
CONSULTATION:
The deadline of 12 June
for comments in relation to the draft bill and regulation makes it difficult to
undertake broad based consultation.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
At this stage there are no perceived implications for the
environment. The requirement to prepare
a State of the Environment Report has been maintained.
Social
The legislation and guidelines are much stronger in relation to community
engagement. This is a positive albeit
with the concern that it will come at an additional cost and pose challenges in
managing major unexpected change.
Economic
At this stage there are no discernible economic impacts.
Risk
At this stage there are no discernible risks.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
The new legislation will require additional
statutory reporting which will come at an additional cost. Fortunately Council has made some progress in
relation to a community strategic plan and is building its capacity in relation
to asset management, workforce management and long term financial
planning. Council’s existing in-house
resources should be able to meet most aspects of the new planning and reporting
requirements.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
At this stage there is no impact on working
funds.
1View |
Circularised Document |
|
Ordinary Council Meeting - 4 June 2009 Integrated Planning and
Reporting - Release of Draft Legislation and Mandatory Guidelines |
Attachment
1 Circularised
Document |
Placeholder
for Attachment 1
Integrated
Planning and Reporting - Release of Draft Legislation and Mandatory Guidelines
Circularised
Document
Pages
4 June
2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.6 SF278 040609 Maintenance of Funding for Headspace Mid
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter, General Manager
Summary: In November 2007, a program targeting the mental health and social
wellbeing of 15-25 year olds in The program, known as, “headspace, Mid North Coast”, is based in
Nambucca Heads and employs 5 full time staff and up to 15 other persons such
as doctors, youth workers, psychologists and administration staff under youth
programs. Headspace Mid North Coast (MNC) has now been advised they will receive
a 50% funding cut which equates to $170,000 for 2009/2010. In the event that the funding is not
forthcoming then headspace MNC will be closed by 30 June 2009. Council should support
representations by headspace MNC for retention of their funding for the
reasons discussed. |
That Council make representations to the Hon. Nicola Roxon MP,
Minister for Health and Ageing and also to Luke Hartsuyker MP, Member for
Cowper seeking the retention of funding for headspace Mid |
OPTIONS:
Council has the option
of making representations for retention of the funding or not making
representations. The Hon. Nicola Roxon
MP is the Minister ultimately responsible for the provision of funding to the
headspace program.
DISCUSSION:
In November 2007, a
program targeting the mental health and social wellbeing of 15-25 year olds in
Until the commencement
of the headspace program there was no specific youth mental health service in
this area. So far in this financial year
there have been:
· 1,232 occasions of service (compared to a target of
1,000 per annum);
· 846 clients seen by GPs;
· 316 clients being seen by youth mental health
workers;
· 99 clients seen by Psychologists;
· 16 community awareness events;
· 8 education and training events
The importance of the
program to the
Headspace Mid North
Coast (MNC) has now been advised they will receive a 50% funding cut which
equates to $170,000 for 2009/2010. In
the event that the funding is not forthcoming then headspace MNC will be closed
by 30 June 2009. So far representations
have been made to headspace national with access.
The Directors of
headspace MNC are now seeking the support of Council in making representations
directly to the Federal Health Minister, Nicola Roxon and also to our local
member Luke Hartsuyker MP.
Putting aside the
importance of the service to the mental health of young people in the Nambucca,
Bellingen and Coffs Harbour LGA’s, it would seem premature to withdraw funding
from a service which has only been operating for 18 months. There has been no opportunity to undertake a
proper review of the service.
Council should support
representations by headspace MNC for retention of their funding for the reasons
discussed.
CONSULTATION:
The Director of
headspace has been advised that the matter would be reported to Council with a
view to making representations seeking the retention of their funding.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no implications for the environment.
Social
The existing program provides a holistic youth mental health service to
15-25 year olds in the Nambucca, Bellingen and
Economic
The headspace MNC service is perhaps the only community service operating
across the entire
Risk
There are no risks in making representations on behalf of headspace MNC.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
There are no budgetary implications for
Council.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There is no impact on working funds.
There are no
attachments for this report.
4 June
2009 |
Director Environment &
Planning's Report
ITEM 10.1 SF1261 040609 Outstanding DA's >12 months, applications where
submissions received & not determined 26 May 2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Barbara Sadler,
Executive Assistant; Emma Shaw, Acting Executive Assistant
Summary: In accordance with Council resolution from
15 May 2008 meeting, the development applications listed below are in excess
of 12 months old (Table 1). Table 2 are development applications which
have been received but not yet determined due to submissions received. In
accordance with Minute 848/08 from Council meeting of 18 December 2008,
should any Councillor wish to “call in” an application a Notice of Motion is
required specifying the reasons why it is to be “called in”. If an application is not called in and
staff consider the matters raised by the submissions have been adequately
addressed then the application will be processed under delegated authority.
Where refusal is recommended the application may be reported to
Council for determination. |
1 That the list of outstanding
development applications (at least 12 months old) and applications received,
be noted and received for information by Council. 2 That the applications where
submissions have been received be noted and received for information by
Council. |
OPTIONS:
TABLE 1: UNRESOLVED
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IN EXCESS OF 12 MONTHS OLD
TOTAL
APPLICATIONS OUTSTANDING 12 MONTHS OR MORE:
0
TABLE 2: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS WHERE
SUBMISSIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND ARE NOT YET DETERMINED
DA
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
SUBMISSIONS
RECEIVED/STAFF COMMENTS |
2008/267 |
24/06/08 |
Proposed Industrial complex for manufacturing buses and ancillary
facilities, including manager’s residence and workers cottages. |
|
§ Several
submissions have been received objecting to the development as not being
suitable for this location as it is not zoned for industrial use and there is
residential land surround the proposed area (which is zoned rural) § Flooding issues § Residential
amenity will be affected by light industrial use of the land including visual
impact § Perceived
lowering of values of land 26/08/08
Advice from applicant additional information to be submitted by the end of
October. |
DA
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
SUBMISSIONS
RECEIVED/STAFF COMMENTS |
2008/267 cont’d |
|
|
|
Following
receipt of information and assessment by Council staff a report will be
prepared for Council’s determination of the application 27/02/09 Letter
sent to applicant advising of 3 month extension to provide further
information |
2009/045 |
13/10/08 |
Rural Boundary Adjustment 7 lots to 3 lots |
Lots 5,7,& 9 729466, Lots 1 & 2 DP 114790, Port 198 DP 755564
& |
§ Concerns with traffic on 23/10/08
Letter to applicant advising of further information required, preliminary
assessment of banana contamination and vehicular access. 09/03/09
7 day letter sent requesting outstanding information 24/03/09
Information not received. Application was to be REFUSED, however - 26/03/09
Outstanding information received – referred to the H&B Surveyors for
comment. Applicant is also confirming the status of the existing dwelling on
the land |
2009/087 |
05/01/2009 |
67 |
Lot 3 DP 241032, Lots 1 & 5 DP 248870 & Lots 1 & 2 DP
377306, |
§ Request for
pedestrian and buggy access to remain 16/01/09
Letter sent to applicant re addition information re noise, bus services,
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage, pedestrian and cycleway networks 18/03/09 Noise
report submitted Application being assessed. 27/04/09
Department of Lands have advised that they don’t support use of the TSR –
subdivision layout may need to be amended – discussions ongoing between
Department of Lands, Council and the applicant. Council has advised the
applicant to submit an amended plan – applicant has agreed & amended plan
being prepared. |
DA
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
SUBMISSIONS
RECEIVED/STAFF COMMENTS |
2009/113 |
17/02/2009 |
4 |
Lot 4 DP 1076959, |
§ No objection to
submission but would like Smith’s Lane maintenance addressed Submissions close 27 March 2009 DES to consider road upgrade requirements Consents prepared to be sent by 29 May 2009 |
2009/115 |
18/02/2009 |
4 |
Lot 21 DP 605564, |
§ Concern with
the upkeep of § Concerns with impact of sewerage for Submissions
close 27 March 2009 DES
to consider road upgrade requirements Consent
prepared to be sent by 29 May 2009 |
2009/119 |
20/02/2009 |
4 |
Lot 82 DP 755537, |
§ No objection to
submission but would like Smith’s Lane maintenance addressed Submissions
close 27 March 2009 DES
to consider road upgrade requirements Consent
prepared to be sent by 29 May 2009 |
2009/127 |
25/02/2009 |
Restaurant (McDonalds) |
Lots 1-3 DP 245995 & |
§ No Explanation
– Stating No Support Of Mac’s § Support for
McDonalds § Stated hours of
operation § Noise and odour
generation § Potential
harmful fumes from the highway § Potential
disturbing behaviour of patrons § Impact of
signage and headlights § Waste packing § Loss of privacy
and devalue of property 11/03/09
Letter to applicant requesting submission of additional information relating
to: 04/05/09
Letter to applicant requesting an amended design & layout to address: § Amenity impacts
to adjoining residence § Compatibility
with Local Traffic Management Plan prepared by Road Net § Deficiencies in
car parking layout |
DA
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
SUBMISSIONS
RECEIVED/STAFF COMMENTS |
2009/128 |
25/02/2009 |
2 |
Lot 10 DP 1033603, |
§ Issues with the
removal of native bushland, placement of building envelope and rainwater run
off § Access is a
high hazard floodway § 7B Wetlands
vulnerability to be considered § Believes has
area of threatened species § An established
WIRES Wallaby rehabilitation and release program area could be jeopardised § Concerns re bushfire hazard protection and
dwelling envelopes 01/04/09 Application
referred to Department of Natural Resources for undertaking of creek crossing 21/04/09 NSW RFS not
prepared to issue S100B approval 27/04/09 Amended plans and
Bushfire Report referred to NSW RFS – awaiting response. |
2009/143 |
18/3/2009 |
2 |
Lot 1 DP 417248, |
§ Concerns with
stormwater system, removal of rocky outgrowths for road widening, speed
limit, dogs and entry to beach § Support
application but would like ROW marked on the plans and restriction of fill Submissions
being reviewed 22/04/09
Applicant requested to submit Coastal Hazard Assessment. 05/05/09
Written request from Applicant that Council await preliminary data from SMEC
to use in its assessment of Sea Level Rise & Coastal Hazard Impacts. SMEC
data due by end of May. Assessment
will recommence on receipt of data. |
There are no attachments for this report.
4 June
2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.2 LF3375 040609 Report on the release of Bonds for Macs'con PTY LTD
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Greg Meyers, Director Environment and Planning
Summary: At the 19 March
2009 Ordinary Council meeting it was resolved: That
Council receive a report on the released bond for the Wia-Ora Sand and Gravel This report
outlines the Bonds that have been required through several Development
Consents associated with Extractive operations at Wia Ora and their
subsequent release. In addition,
Council at its 7 May 2009 meeting resolved: That
the report on the release of the Bonds for Wia-Ora Sand and Gravel consider
the options for calling in the bonds to undertake the works |
1 That Council note the circumstances
regarding the release of two bonds associated with Extractive Operations and
Processing Plant at Wia Ora. 2 That Council note the potential
conflicts and additional costs should Council proceed to call in the bonds
prior to the matter being resolved between the operators and the Department
of Water and Energy in regard to the disputed outstanding works. 3 That Council advise its insurers of
a possible claim in this matter if not resolved between the operator and the
Department of Water and Energy. |
OPTIONS:
Whilst Council has
several options the recommendations are considered the most appropriate at this
time.
DISCUSSION:
When considering the
release of the final two Bonds held by Council relating to Extractive
Operations at Wia Ora at its 19 March 2009 Ordinary Meeting, Council sought a
report on the circumstances regarding the previous release of bonds associated
with the operations by Wia-Ora Sand and Gravel, Mac'scon and Mac'sville
Concrete in this locality.
Through the various
development consent conditions for DA 3040 (DA 1995/102), DA 2000/269 & DA
2001/093 Bonds (Bank Guarantees) were required for:
DA
3040 T1-9-485and modified through DA 1995/102
Original DA 3040 (22
September 1993) Sites A & B Gravel Extraction
11 The applicant to enter
into a bond to ensure rehabilitation of the excavation and stockpile sites
together with all necessary landscape works required by the Department of Water
resources and Department of CALM. Such bond shall be $2,000 and is to be paid
to Council prior to operations. The amount will be refunded subject to all
relevant Authorities being satisfied with the rehabilitation works.
Modified
(Deferred Commencement) DA 1995/102 (27 September 1995) (Endorsed Consent 26
March 1996) Site C Gravel Extraction
5i The applicant to enter into a bond to
ensure rehabilitation of the excavation and stockpile sites together with all
necessary landscape works required by the Department of Water resources and
Department of CALM. Such bond shall be $10,000 and is to be paid to Council
prior to operations. The amount will be refunded subject to all relevant
Authorities being satisfied with the rehabilitation works.
DA3040
T1-9-485 (Modified Consent 21 August 2000) Sites A, B1, B2 & B3
2f All buffer areas to be adequately fenced
from stock. Proponent to submit a revised Landscape Plan by a suitably
qualified person to Council and DLWC within one month of determination of
consent. Landscape Plan must include a schedule of buffer establishment and
annual reporting by suitably qualified person on functionality of five years
planting for pits A, B1, B2 and B3. Retention of a performance bond of $5,000
held by Council to be linked to Landscape Plan and reporting. Species selection
to be consistent with publication Revegetating Streams in the Nambucca
Catchment – A Guide to Species and Planting Methods. Buffers to remain in place
for the life of any dam structures remaining after the initial extractive development
stage. The owner to provide a Deed of Agreement supported by a Caveat, at his
cost, on the land title deeds for a period of five years ensuring the buffer
becomes well established.
DA 2000/269 (Consent 4 September 2000) Enlarged
20 The
applicant shall provide a bank guarantee, in the sum of $8,000 in favour of
Council, being the sum necessary to ensure due completion of the rehabilitation
and vegetation works described in conditions 10(a) and (b) (Landscape Plan) and
19 (Site Rehabilitation Plan). The bank guarantee only being released upon
effective rehabilitation works being undertaken and establishment and
maintenance of buffer plantings to the satisfaction of Department of Land and
Water Conservation.
DA 2001/093 (Consent 22 February 2001) Additional Stockpile area
13 The applicant shall provide a bank guarantee, in the sum of $2,000 to
be linked to DA3040, in favour of Council being the sum necessary to ensure due
completion of the rehabilitation and landscaping works required of condition
11. In the event rehabilitation works are not undertaken in accordance with
this consent, Council may use the guarantee to have appropriate rehabilitation
works undertaken.
Note: Council accepts the $2,000 paid with DA3040 as
also meeting this condition an the basis the amount will not be refunded until
works required of DA 2001/093 and DA3040 are satisfied.
It should be noted that
the $2,000 bond referred to in condition 13 for DA2001/093 is not an additional
bond, but rather the same as required by condition 11 for DA 3040 above.
The current bonds held
by Council are the $2,000 (Sites A & B) and $10,000 (Site C) required by
conditions 11 (DA 3040 22/09/1993) and condition 5i (DA 1995/102) respectfully.
The Landscape Plan as
required by condition 2f above for DA DA3040 T1-9-485 (Modified Consent 21 August
2000) Sites A, B1, B2 & B3 was submitted and subsequently signed off by
DLWC on 1 November 2000. The $5,000 bond by way of Bank Guarantee was received
by Council on 17 November 2000. The Caveat was registered on 8 May 2001.
Discussions commenced in November 2001 in regard to
rehabilitation works completed and underway at the above Extractive Operations
and Processing Plant. The following letter from DLWC was received by Council on
4 December 2001.
The Annual Report as
referred to in the above letter was received by Council on 30 July 2002. The
report was assessed by Council staff and forwarded to the relevant agencies for
comment. During the following 12 months a number of issues, inspections and
discussions were held between the operators, Council staff and agencies as it
was evident that there were varying levels of opinion between the agencies
above letter, onsite discussions and the operators horticulturalist as to the adequacy
and compliance of the rehabilitation buffers and plantings.
A number of meetings
were held (21/07/03, 11/09/03, 6&13/11/03 and 10/12/03) in regard to the
operations on site between the agencies, operators and Council resulting in a
number of letters being issued.
Further meetings were
held in early 2004 resulting in the detailed response prepared by the then
Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources which critically
examined and detailed the anomalies and requirements for the extractive
operations and compliance with consent conditions, noting this was some 30
months after the above letter and in the midst of the drought.
As Council is now aware
this is the current point of dispute with the extent of works required by the
now Department of Energy and Water and the dispute by the operator which
remains unresolved at this point in time.
Notwithstanding, the
questions raised by Council as to the process relating to the release of the
two bonds and the possibility of calling in the bonds and Council undertaking
the works is outlined below.
The two bonds (Bank
Guarantees) of $5,000 and $8,000 respectively, were returned according to
Council’s records on 21 February 2005. After extensive investigation into their
return there does not appear to be any written record as to the authority to
return the bonds other than the assumption that as the Bank Guarantees had a
“Termination Date” of 31 March 2001, an audit was undertaken and those
identified as “Terminated “ appear to have been returned to the respective
banks. Noting that there was another unrelated Bank Guarantee retuned on this
same date (21 February 2005).
Of the two bonds only
the $5,000 bond related to the gravel extraction rehabilitation activities,
whilst the $8,000 bond related to the “
As can be read in condition 2f for DA3040 T1-9-485
(Modified Consent 21 August 2000) Sites A, B1, B2 & B3, the only reference
to and requirement from a government agency was the appointment of a “suitably qualified “ horticulturalist"
to prepare the Landscape Plan.
As discussed previously
in the report the two remaining bonds relate to Site C ($10,000) and Sites A,
B1, B2 & B3 ($2,000). The former operators have renewed both of the bonds
since they wound up the company and do not have a “Termination Date” attached
to them. However, the operators wish to finalise this matter and have both
bonds returned.
Council also sought
advice into the possibility of calling in the two bonds (Bank Guarantees) to
have any outstanding works completed.
Whilst it is quite open
to Council to proceed to call on the bonds, it is something that should be
considered with caution in light of the discussions and disagreement that took
place onsite at Council’s General Purpose Committee meeting in March this year.
Should Council proceed to "call in" the bonds and proceed to have the
works completed and a budget short fall arose, Council would have to find the
balance of funds and then pursue the operator through the courts which may very
well cost the ratepayers considerably more and may never be recouped.
Until the disputed
matters are finally resolved between the operator and DWE it is recommended
that Council continue to hold the bonds (Bank Guarantees) until some agreement
or compromise is achieved.
CONSULTATION:
Nil
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no environmental impacts arising from this report. The works
that the Bonds are tied to relate to performance, maintenance and
rehabilitation of extracted/disturbed land associated with approved
developments.
Social
There are no social impacts arising from this report. The works that the
Bonds are tied to relate to performance, maintenance and rehabilitation of
extracted/disturbed land associated with approved developments.
Economic
There are potential private and public economic impacts arising from this
report as the works that the Bonds are tied to relate to performance,
maintenance and rehabilitation of extracted/disturbed land associated with
approved developments.
Risk
There are considerable risks arising from this report as the works that
the Bonds are tied to relate to performance, maintenance and rehabilitation of
extracted/disturbed land associated with approved developments and if not
finalised Council could face the risk of having to pursue the matter or be
pursued itself through the Courts.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
None identified at this stage.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
Non required at this stage.
There are no
attachments for this report.
4 June
2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.3 SF276 040609 Aboriginal Community Advisory Committee AGM
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Patricia Walker, Aboriginal Community Development Officer
Summary: The minutes contain one recommendation for Council's consideration which relates to the endorsement of the Committee following the election of office bearers and committee. |
That Council note the
minutes from the Annual General Meeting held on 12 May 2009 and endorse the
voting membership to the Aboriginal Community Advisory Committee of Ms Cathy
Bula (Chair), Ms Raylene
Ballangarry (Deputy Chair), Mr
Michael Donovan, Mr Darren Kershaw, Mr Robert Wilson, Mr Colin Jarrett, Mr
Gary Williams, Mr Caine Rosser, Ms Paula Craig, Mrs Jennifer Rosser, Mr
Barry Donovan, Mr Semi Bula, Ms Beryl Wilson, Mr Neville Kim,
Ms Kimberly Jones, Mr Michael J Donovan, Ms Belinda Donovan, Ms Mila
Bula, Ms Tamara Smith, Mr Anthony Gillin, Mrs Rachel Gillin, Ms Penny
Stadhams, Ms Vicki Power, Mr Scott Mieni, Ms Patricia Gail Ling, Ms Louise
Robinson, Ms Michele Donovan, Ms Karen Ella-Bird, Ms Marcia Hillery, Mr
Terry Marshall, Mr Larry Kelly, Ms Ann Edwards, Ms Tracy Cohen, Mr Dean
Jarrett, Mrs Tracy Singleton, Ms Shirley Ballangarry. |
OPTIONS:
1 Endorse the
minutes and the recommendation
2 Not endorse
the minutes
3 Endorse the
minutes with amendment/s
DISCUSSION:
Council's Community Development Officer, Patricia Walker, will only provide secretarial support and is not a voting member of the Aboriginal Community Advisory Committee.
Manager Community and Cultural Services Comments: The minutes recommend the endorsement by Council of the minutes of the previous AGM. These were in fact endorsed by Council on 15 March 2007. Councillors Ballangarry and South are already endorsed members of the Committee as per Council’s resolution regarding delegates to Committees on 2 October 2008. Cr Flack is an alternate delegate as per Council’s resolution of 5 February 2009.
CONSULTATION:
Manager Community and Cultural Services
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
Nil
Social
Positive relationships between Council and the local Aboriginal community
Economic
Nil
Risk
Nil
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct and indirect impact on current and future budgets
Nil
Source of fund and any variance to working funds
Nil
1View |
12398/2009 - Minutes of ACAC AGM Meeting Tuesday
12 May 2009 |
|
Ordinary Council Meeting - 4 June 2009 Aboriginal Community
Advisory Committee AGM |
Attachment
1 12398/2009
- Minutes of ACAC AGM Meeting Tuesday 12 May 2009 |
Present
Councillor Martin Ballangarry, Mrs
Cathy Bula (Chairperson), Mr Barry Donovan, Mrs Michele Donovan, Ms Beryl
Wilson, Ms Jennifer Rosser, Ms Mila Bula, Ms Vicki Power, Ms Penny Stadhams, Ms
Raylene Ballangarry, Ms Patricia Walker
Apologies
Cr South, Ms Kerry Grace, Mr Michael
Donovan, Mr Caine Rosser, Mr Semi Bula, Ms Kerry-Ann Jarrett, Mr Gary Williams
Minutes of Previous AGM – 20 February
2007 – Nil Business Arising
RECOMMENDATION: That on the motion of Ms Jennifer Rosser seconded by Cr
Ballangarry that the minutes of the previous Annual General Meeting 20 February
2007 be accepted and be endorsed by Council.
Motion carried and accepted by all
members present.
Chairperson’s Report
Mrs Cathy Bula Chairperson welcomes
everyone and informs members that the AGM will be first.
She comments that even though there
have been several attempts made for the ACAC annual general meeting, we finally
have got there.
A discussion ensued about current
membership and the Nomination Form.
Members present discussed that there is
a Members List. This List is only updated when addresses change or new
membership is applied via a Nomination Form, and, when that new member has been
endorsed by Council.
Note: ACAC is the only Council committee that have a
Nomination Form.
Ms Beryl Wilson entered the meeting
10:50 am.
Election of Office Bearers
On the motion of Mr Barry Donovan
seconded by Ms Jennie Rosser Cr Ballangarry was appointed the Returning Officer
for the election of Office Bearers.
Cathy Bula thanked Council for projects
that were successful and unsuccessful. She also thanked Patricia for meeting
agendas.
Ms Cathy Bula and Mr Michael Donovan stood
down as Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson, respectively.
Cr Ballangarry then called for
nominations for Chairperson.
Election of Office Bearers (continued)
Chairperson
There were three nominations to the
position of Chairperson.
Ms Penny Stadhams nominated Ms Raylene
Ballangarry seconded by Vicki Power. Raylene Ballangarry accepts nomination.
Ms Cathy Bula nominates Mrs Michele
Donovan. Mrs Donovan declines nomination.
Ms Jennie Rosser nominated Cathy Bula
seconded by Michele Donovan. Cathy Bula accepts nomination.
Ms Cathy Bula nominates Ms Beryl
Wilson. Ms Wilson declines nomination.
Ms Beryl Wilson nominates Mr Barry
Donovan seconded by Ms Cathy Bula. Mr Donovan accepts nomination.
Three calls were made for more
nominations to Chairperson. Voting declared closed.
For voting preference, members agreed
on secret ballot. Members voted and handed papers to Cr Ballangarry.
Cr Ballangarry proceeded to count the
votes at the back of the room.
Results of the count:
Ms Raylene Ballangarry received 3 votes
Ms Cathy Bula received 5 votes
Mr Barry Donovan received 1 vote
Ms Cathy Bula was declared as
Chairperson for the 2009-2010 Aboriginal Community Advisory Committee.
Deputy Chairperson
Cr
Ballangarry calls for nominations for Deputy Chairperson.
Ms Beryl
Wilson nominates Mr Barry Donovan seconded by Ms Jennie Rosser.
Mr Donovan
accepts nomination.
Ms Penny
Stadhams nominates Ms Raylene Ballangarry seconded by Ms Mila Bula. Ms
Ballangarry accepts nomination.
Ms Cathy Bula
nominated Ms Jennie Rosser. Ms Rosser declines nomination.
Ms Cathy Bula
nominates Mrs Michele Donovan seconded by Mr Barry Donovan. Mrs Donovan accepts
nomination.
Election of Office Bearers (continued)
Three calls
were made for more nominations for Deputy Chairperson. Voting declared closed.
Votes were counted by Cr Ballangarry at back of the room.
Results of
the count:
Mr Barry
Donovan received 2
votes
Mrs Michele
Donovan received 3
votes
Ms Raylene
Ballangarry received 4
votes
Ms Raylene
Ballangarry declared as Deputy Chairperson for the 2009-2010 Aboriginal
Community Advisory Committee.
Secretary
It was noted that secretarial support
be provided by Council staff, Ms Patricia Walker.
Committee Members
RECOMMENDATION:
On the motion of Michele Donovan seconded by Barry Donovan that voting
members of Aboriginal Community Advisory Committee during 2009-2010 are Ms
Cathy Bula (Chair), Ms Raylene
Ballangarry (Deputy Chair), Mr
Michael Donovan, Mr Darren Kershaw, Mr Robert Wilson, Mr Colin Jarrett, Mr Gary
Williams, Mr Caine Rosser, Ms Paula Craig, Mrs Jennifer Rosser, Mr Barry
Donovan, Mr Semi Bula, Ms Beryl Wilson, Mr Neville Kim, Ms Kimberly Jones, Mr
Michael J Donovan, Ms Belinda Donovan, Ms Mila Bula, Ms Tamara Smith, Mr
Anthony Gillin, Mrs
Motion carried and accepted by all
members present.
Council Delegates
Cr Martin Ballangarry and Cr Elaine
South
Cr Paula Flack, Alternate Delegate
Returning Officer steps down and hands
over the ordinary meeting to Ms Cathy Bula, Aboriginal Community Advisory
Committee Chairperson who declares the
meeting closed.
Closure
There being no further business the
meeting closed at 11.15 am.
...................................
Cathy Bula
Chairperson
4 June
2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.4 SF276 040609 Aboriginal Community Advisory Committee Meeting
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Patricia Walker, Aboriginal Community Development Officer
Summary: The minutes contain one recommendation for Council's consideration which is reproduced as follows: RECOMMENDATION: That on the motion of Ms Beryl Wilson seconded by Penny Stadhams that
the Aboriginal Youth Worker report to ACAC, either in person or by a written
report. |
1 That Council note
the Committee’s request for a written or verbal report from the Aboriginal
Youth Worker. 2 That the remaining
minutes of the Aboriginal Community Advisory Committee held on 12 May
2009 be noted. |
OPTIONS:
1 Endorse the
minutes and the recommendation
2 Not endorse
the minutes
3 Endorse the
minutes with amendments
4 Manex
comment
DISCUSSION:
CONSULTATION:
Manager Community and Cultural Services comment: The Youth Worker would be providing an update on recent activities, programs or youth issues for the information of the Committee.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
Nil
Social
Nil
Economic
Nil
Risk
Nil
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct and indirect impact on current and future budgets
Nil
Source of fund and any variance to working funds
Nil
1View |
12399/2009 - Minutes of ACAC Ordinary Meeting
Tuesday 12 May 2009 |
|
Ordinary Council Meeting - 4 June 2009 Aboriginal Community
Advisory Committee Meeting |
Attachment
1 12399/2009
- Minutes of ACAC Ordinary Meeting Tuesday 12 May 2009 |
Present
Ms Cathy Bula,
(Chairperson) Councillor Martin Ballangarry, Ms Mila Bula, Mrs Michele Donovan,
Mrs Jennie Rosser, Mr Barry Donovan, Ms Vicki Power, Ms Raylene Ballangarry, Ms
Penny Stadhams, Ms Beryl Wilson.
Apologies
Cr. South, Ms Kerry Grace, Mr Michael Donovan, Mr Caine
Rosser, Mr Semi Bula, Ms Kerry-Ann Jarrett, Mr Gary Williams.
The Chairperson commenced
the meeting by going over the aims and objectives of the Committee and a
reminder to support the ACAC on a regular basis and gave congratulations to Ms
Raylene Ballangarry for her appointment as Deputy Chairperson.
Ms Bula said that there is
a long road ahead and encouraged others to support ACAC.
Housekeeping and Emergency
Procedures
The Chairperson addressed
these procedures.
Declaration of Pecuniary
Interest
None declared
Previous Minutes – 16 December
2008.
Business Arising from
Minutes
ITEM
1 – DARIMBA MAARA
Mr Barry Donovan inquired
about refurbishment at Darimba Maara. Works had started but had ceased. The CEO
was on leave for a month. Looking for more dollars for refurbishment.
Aboriginal Connections received tender for the works.
Ms Beryl Wilson will follow
through with enquiries in regards to the refurbishment.
Correspondence
The following
correspondence was tabled by Chairperson:
Department Environment and
Climate Change
Pregnancy Help
Public Sector Marketing
General Business
ITEM
2 – SPORT AND RECREATION TRAINEESHIP
Ms Patricia Walker updated
members on the traineeship. Ms Walker explained that this is the second round
of advertisement, there were 6 applications. Interviews are on Friday 15 May
2009, with the position being filled late May 2009. Interview panel is Lyn
Larsen (NSW Department of Sport and Recreation), Ritchie Donovan (Trainer) and
Patricia Walker.
ITEM
3 – ACAC MEETING ROTATED BETWEEN LALC'S
Ms Patricia Walker
explained that the General Manager,
Ms Bula said that ACAC had
tried this before and will try again.
CDO to request LALC's
approval of hosting an ACAC. If no space available, CDO to consider and assist
LALC with venue.
All members agreed that
Bowraville LALC will be approached first because of new CEO and to introduce
him to the wider community.
ITEM
4 – NAIDOC WEEK
NAIDOC is hosted by
Bowraville this year. The march is being re-routed and finalisation of the
program was held recently at a meeting.
Mr Barry Donovan to see
about volunteers for marshalling during the march. Mr Donovan will liaise with
the local Police for that day and report at next ACAC.
Ms Raylene Ballangarry
encouraged everyone to participate in this year's NAIDOC, that the program is
for the whole community.
Ms Mila Bula to contribute
fruit to Day 3's activities held at
Members Reports
Community Development
Officer – Nambucca Heads LALC letter of support for the Community Savers
Stream.
Ms Jennie Rosser (TAFE) –
Statement of Attainment course will be starting next term at Macksville Campus
of TAFE. The course will run one day a week for 3 hours and will eventually
become a certificate course.
Ms Beryl Wilson (Ngurrala)
– CDEP will be terminating in June 2009. Participants are receiving major
support during the transition. Births, Deaths & Marriages are assisting by
proving information about certificates. BBQ is scheduled for the 20 May 2009.
Members Reports (continued)
Ms Cathy Bula (New Careers
for Aboriginal People) – NCAP has moved from
Ms Vicki Power (Community
Facilitator – Bowraville Commonwealth Shared Responsibility Agreement/CSRA) –
Every third Wednesday there is a morning tea held at MiiMi for service
providers, next morning tea is scheduled for 20 May 2009. A Men's Group has
started as well. MiiMi has a 2 year lease on the old 'Butter Factory'. There
are 6 sheds which will be used for activities and will considering renting
office space.
Ms Penny Stadhams
(Department of Aboriginal Affairs) – Her position is to set up networks and
strengthen existing ones, assist with body governance. Ms Stadhams tabled
information on her role in the community. Ms Stadhams would like the CDO to
follow up on where Council is at for James Park in Bowraville. Ms Stadhams is under
the impression that Council had come to an agreement with the Committee of
Management about the upgrade of James Park.
Ms Mila Bula (Aboriginal
Aged Care) – has moved to
Cr Ballangarry – Missabotti
Hall has a TAFE course in cementing/paving. The course is a Statement of
Attainment with 5 participants taught by Mark Selby.
RECOMMENDATION: That on the motion of Ms Beryl Wilson seconded by
Penny Stadhams that the Aboriginal Youth Worker report to ACAC, either in
person or by a written report.
Motion carried and accepted
by all members present.
Next Meeting
Members agreed to set
meetings to the third Tuesday of the month.
Closure
The meeting concluded at
11:55 pm.
……………………………….
CATHY
BULA
CHAIRPERSON
4 June
2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.5 SF669 040609 Report on the request for nominations to Joint Regional Planning
Panels
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Greg Meyers, Director Environment and Planning
Summary: Council has been requested by the
Department of Planning to nominate representatives to serve on the Northern
Region Joint Regional Planning Panel (JRPP). |
1 That Council
request an extension of time to enable further consultation and discussions
with adjoining Councils on options for resource sharing to address concerns
relating to potential conflicts of interest by Council nominated
representation. 2 That the Department be advised
that in the event an extension is not granted and subject to formal agreement
with Kempsey Shire Council, Nambucca Shire nominate the 3 Council nominate the 4 That in the event that Kempsey Shire do not formally
agree to the proposed resource sharing proposal Council nominate the |
OPTIONS:
Should Council choose to nominate two
local representatives other then the
DISCUSSION:
The Minister for Planning has requested
Council by letter dated 5 May 2009, to nominate two persons (plus one alternate
member) to become members of the Northern Region Joint Regional Planning Panel
(JRPP). Submissions are required by 5 June
2009 with the JRPP to commence on 1 July 2009. (see attached copy)
The purpose of the JRPP is to act as
the consent authority for all DAs deemed to be of regional significance and to
advise the Minister in respect to any planning matter or planning instruments
in respect to the region.
The JRPP will become the consent
authority in respect to the following developments:-
· Commercial, residential, mixed use, retail and tourism development
with a capital investment value more than $10 million and less than $100
million
· Community infrastructure and ecotourism developments more than $5
million both public and private, such as schools, community halls and child
care facilities
· Certain coastal developments currently in Schedule 2 of the Major
Projects SEPP
· Designated development
· Development where the council is the proponent or has a potential
conflict of interest.
Membership of the JRPP
It is proposed that the JRPP will be
comprised of
Three (3) members appointed by the
Minister (nominations have been called)
Two (2) members appointed by each
Council to consider matters related to their LGA (plus an alternate)
Selection Criteria:
Selection
criteria includes:-
· Senior level experience in dealing with multiple stakeholders
· High level communication skills
· Capability to drive high profile outcomes in a credible and
authoritative manner
· High level analytical skills; and
· Knowledge of the assessment of complex developments and planning
matters; and
In addition, at least one of the
Council nominees must have a high level of expertise in one or more of the
following fields:
· Planning
· Architecture
· Heritage
· The environment
· Urban design
· Land economics
· Traffic and transport
· Law
· Engineering
· Tourism
Method of Selection
Basic guidelines in the form of a
Selection Criteria for members have been provided to assist Council in the
calling of Expressions of Interest and consideration of applicants. The
representatives need not be an elected Councillor or Council staff member.
However, finding someone in the community who may fit the criteria and willing
to sit on the Panel may be a challenge.
Conflicts of Interest
The Department has advised that in
nominating a member, Council needs to fully recognise that the person would be
expected to act independently of Council and should not be subject to influence
by other Councillor or Council Officer on matters to be determined by the JRPP.
The consensus amongst the Local
Government Planning Directors Group (the Group was formed to raise concerns
relating to the NSW planning reform agenda and meets regularly with the
Minister and senior officials) is that Local Government planning directors/managers
cannot represent their respective councils on a JRPP as they have an inherent
conflict of interest as they are also responsible for preparing the planning
assessment report for presentation to and consideration of the JRPP.
Advice provided by an internal auditor
at a large metropolitan council suggests that elected councillors would also be
placed in a conflict of interest between their obligations to represent the
interests of their community and to act as a member of an independent external
planning panel.
In order to address this conflict of
interest, the idea has been floated within MIDGOC GMs to consider a resource
sharing arrangement whereby the nominated representatives from each council
would serve on the JRPP for matters relating to other councils in the MIDGOC,
thereby avoiding conflicts of interest, whilst maintaining suitable
representation on the JRPP. This would also provide the opportunity for the
council appointed members to make representations directly to the JRPP in
support of a submission on any matter relating to their LGA.
However, should other MIDGOC Council's
be interested in this initiative, an extension to the restrictive time frame of
5 June 2009, should be sought.
Discussions have
been held with Officers of Kempsey Shire Council where both Councils would each
nominate 2 members to sit on the JRPP for the respective councils. The proposed
nominations would be referred to each Council for endorsement and submission.
This arrangement would have the following
benefits:-
· Both councils are of similar size, have similar
demographic profiles, experience similar types of development and are affected
by similar constraints.
· The number of applications to be dealt with by the
JRPP for both Councils is expected to be similar (very low possibly 6 – 12 per
year), thereby representing an equitable cost to each council.
· The arrangement would not be binding and each
council can review the arrangement and/or nominated members should they so
choose
JRPP Procedures
Only sketchy details have been provided
in respect to:
· Whether the JRPP, including travel and accommodation costs of
State nominated members is to be funded. It has previously been suggested that
the costs should be borne by the host councils.
· The format for standardised assessment and reporting
· A Code of Conduct
· A Code of Meeting Practice
NOTE The Department has advised that
if a council fails to nominate members for the LGA, the JRPP may still exercise
its functions within the LGA.
CONSULTATION:
General Manager
MIDGOC
Director Sustainable
Development Kempsey Shire Council
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
The proposal for JRPP may not necessarily provide for better
environmental considerations or outcomes.
Social
The proposal for JRPP may not necessarily provide for better social
considerations or outcomes.
Economic
No information has been provided to determine the cost implications for
councils or applicants in respect to how the JRPP will be funded.
Risk
Council will still have the opportunity of making representations to the
JRPP if desired. The risk for Council is that if it chooses a Councillor and
staff member to represent it on the panel they may not necessarily represent
the majority view or position of Council.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
Unknown at this stage
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
General Fund and DA fees.
1View |
12618/2009 - Information and Request for
Nominations for the Regional Planning Panels |
|
2View |
12660/2009 - Submission in Response to Discussion
Paper on Joint Regional Planning Panels |
|
4 June
2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.6 SF812 040609 Naidoc Week - 5 July to 12 July 2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Patricia Walker, Aboriginal Community Development Officer
Summary: This report is to advise Council that National Aboriginal and Islander Day of Celebration (NAIDOC) Week will be held Sunday 5 July – Saturday 12 July 2009 and to seek Council's endorsement for a Council-hosted event being a Flag Raising and Morning Tea. This will confirm agreement in principle provided to the Committee by Council’s General Manager in February. |
1 That Council note
NAIDOC Week is scheduled for Sunday 5 July to Saturday 12 July 2009 with the
theme 'Honouring Our Elders, Nurturing
Our Youth', and the many activities programmed to occur during the Week. 2 That Council host
a Welcome to Country, Flag Raising and Smoking Ceremony to be held at
Council's Administration Centre Monday 6 July 2009 followed by a Morning Tea
and Photo Exhibition. |
OPTIONS:
Council has the option of not conducting a NAIDOC Week activity on and/or within Council premises.
DISCUSSION:
Council's Community Development Officer has been very active in contributing to the NAIDOC Committee program and the final touches were resolved recently.
The NAIDOC Committee's plan for Monday 6 July 2009 is an Official Welcome to Country and a Smoking and Flag Raising Ceremony at the Council's Administration Centre commencing at 9 am. This will be followed by a morning tea at Council.
The proposed Ceremony will take approximately two and half hours and is unlikely to disrupt Council Staff or the community.
Invitations will be issued to all Councillors and Senior Staff, together with Elders and two student representatives from local schools.
Also as a part
of Council’s contribution to NAIDOC Week Council’s Aboriginal Youth Worker and
Community Development Officer will be undertaking a Photo Exhibition at
Macksville Library. The exhibition will follow the NAIDOC Week theme of 'Honouring Our Elders, Nurturing Our Youth'
and will focus on portrait photos of local Gumbaynggirr Elders and young
people. The project will revisit the
Attached for Councillor’s information is the proposed program for the local NAIDOC Week celebrations.
CONSULTATION:
NAIDOC Committee Chairperson Raylene Ballangarry
Director
Environment and Planning
Manager
Community and Cultural Services Coral
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
Nil
Social
Positive relationships between Council and Aboriginal Elders
Economic
Nil
Risk
This is identified as a low risk activity.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct and indirect impact on current and future budgets