Ordinary
Council Meeting - 02 July 2009
AGENDA Page
1 APOLOGIES
2 PRAYER
3 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
4 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES — Ordinary
Council Meeting - 18 June 2009
5 Notices
of Motion
5.1 Notice of Motion - Naming
of Lane in Macksville
6 DELEGATIONS—Motion to
hear Delegations
7 ASKING OF QUESTIONS WITH
NOTICE
8 QUESTIONS FOR CLOSED
MEETING WHERE DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED
9 General Manager Report
9.1 Outstanding
Actions and Reports
9.2 Grant
Application Status Report - 23 June 2009
9.3 Reclassification
of the Bowraville -
9.4 Purchase
of
10 Director Environment and Planning Report
10.1 Aboriginal
Child Youth and Family Strategy and Changes to Youth Services at Council
10.2 NSW
Sport and Recreation Traineeship
10.3 Report
on Review of Nambucca Shire Council - On-site Sewage Management Plan
10.4 Report
on DA 2008/269 Deck, Garage & Internal Alterations/Change of Use to
Residential -
10.5 Outstanding
DA's >12 months, applications where submissions received & not
determined 23 June 2009
10.6 Report
on Land & Environment Court Challenge by Nambucca Valley Conservation
Association in regard to DA 2004/136
11 Director Engineering Services Report
11.1 Nambucca
District Water Supply Bowraville Off-River Storage Steering Committee Minutes -
3 June 2009
11.2 Minutes from the Plant Committee Meetings held 29 January and 19 June 2009
2 July
2009 |
Notice of Motion
ITEM 5.1 SF1269 020709 Notice of Motion - Naming of Lane in Macksville
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Moran OAM, Councillor
Summary: The lane between
West and The main concern
to the residents, who live off the lane, are experiencing problems in
describing the location of the lane to emergency services. Council should
advertise for a name for this lane relating to the Provost family who have
been in this vicinity for over 80 years. |
1 That Council advertise calling for a
name for the lane between 2 That consideration be given
to a name relating to the Provost family. |
There are no
attachments for this report.
2 July
2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.1 SF959 020709 Outstanding Actions and Reports
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter, General Manager
Summary: The following table is a report
on all outstanding resolutions and questions from Councillors (except
development consents, development control plans & local environmental
plans). Matters which are simply noted or received, together with resolutions
adopting rates, fees and charges are not listed as outstanding actions. Where
matters have been actioned they are indicated with |
That the list of outstanding
actions and reports be noted and received for information by Council. |
No |
FILE
NO |
COUNCIL MEETING |
SUMMARY OF MATTER |
ACTION BY |
STATUS |
||||||
|
JULY 2008 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1 |
Item
9.9 |
03/07/08 |
Council make representation to
Minister for Lands seeking agreed compensation for subdivision of Reserve
91694 |
GM |
Letter sent 15/07/08. Follow up letter sent 14/11/2008. Minister for Lands has advised by letter
dated 8/1/09 that land will be made available to Council as per the agreement
following finalisation of an Aboriginal Land Claim. Follow up letter sent 9 April. |
|||||
2 |
Item
11.4 |
03/07/08 |
That a new plan of management
be prepared for Farringdon Playing Fields |
DES |
Funding declined. Work on preparing plan to be scheduled. Interested parties will need to identify
potential uses for inclusion in revised plan of management. Local cricket and soccer associations to
be contacted regarding use of the fields. No response as at 22 June 2009. |
|||||
OCTOBER 2008 |
|
|||||||||
3 |
RF256 |
16/10/08 |
Notice of
Motion - Riverbank Erosion - |
DES |
Subject to GHD undertaking evaluation. Separate assessments underway for: Ellis Ave & Doyle Lane Landslips: Awaiting further survey. Catchment Assessment: Report being prepared by GHD. |
|
||||
NOVEMBER
2008 |
|||||
4 |
SF544 |
6/11/08 |
Council review biennial the
Community Infrastructure and Infrastructure Needs Study and review annually
the Section 94 Community Facilities and Open Space Contributions Plan Works
Schedule. |
GM |
Report November 2009 |
5 |
SF42 |
20/11/08 |
That Council receive a report
back on the Dept. of Local Government Circular 08-61 – Plumbing Inspections
by Council. |
DEP |
16 April 2009 Matter deferred as AIBS and DEPA are
currently investigating the consequences of this circular. |
DECEMBER 2008 |
|
|||||
6 |
SF688 |
4/12/08 |
That
during the first half of the 2009/10 year Council call for community input into
a new Environmental Levy program for the 5 year period to the end of
2014/2015. |
DEP |
Programmed for
September 2009. |
|
7 |
|
18/12/08 |
That Council
seek the agreement of the tenderers to an extended evaluation period which
will conclude on 30 June 2009. |
GM |
MIT consulting
with tenderers. Tender evaluation to
occur April/May 2009. |
|
8 |
SF1046 |
18/12/08 |
That
the Wellington Drive component of the Urban Design Strategy be deferred
pending a further report to Council in relation to further studies re land
slip, rising sea level and traffic/parking. |
DEP |
Report March
2009. Deferred in
Draft Budget. 16 April 2009
meeting. Deferred until
draft Nambucca River Master Plan prepared. |
|
JANUARY 2009 |
||||||
9 |
PRF53 |
15/01/09 |
Preparation
of landscape design for |
DES |
Quotations
being sought. Late March. Deferred to May
2009. Deferred to
June 2009. Deferred to
July 2009. |
|
10 |
PRF53 |
15/01/09 |
DES
to enquire with Department of Public Works about opportunities to remove or
refurbish the river gauging station in |
DES |
Letter sent to
the Manly Hydraulics Laboratory. The Dept of
Commerce have advised that Council in 1981 raised no objection to the
Department of Public Works proposal to install an automatic recorder after
consideration of the approximate location and type of structure, The site is
important because of the consistency with historical data. An alternative
building or structure must still use the same site. Letter sent re
standard of building required. |
|
FEBRUARY 2009 |
|||||
11 |
SF241 |
5/02/09 |
That a new plan of management
for the reserve within Kingsworth Estate be prepared by DES. To include pedestrian and vehicular access
arrangements and management of environmental values. |
DES |
October 2009 |
12 |
SF869 |
19/02/09 |
Council write to Country
Energy concerning energy being wasted with street lighting at the Pearl
Estate off the |
DES |
DES to meet Country Energy to discuss
further. Meeting 15 June 2009—Cancelled Now 13 July 2009 |
13 |
SF1031 |
19/02/09 |
That a report be brought to
Council on its capacity to keep electronic information long term and in a
fail safe condition. |
GM |
MIT to report in July 2009. |
MARCH 2009 |
|||||
14 |
SF1297 |
5/03/09 |
That
Council make representations to the DECC and RFS re requirements for bushfire
asset protection zones around houses. |
DEP |
Letters to be
prepared and sent. Letters sent 16
March 2009. Response from
DECC received No response
from RFS as at 23 June 2009. |
DA09/049 |
5/03/09 |
The RTA be requested to revise
the speed limit along the |
DES |
Letter sent. No response as at 24 March 2009. RTA advised 6 April 2009 that they will
review and advise Council of outcome. Follow up letter sent to RTA. No response as at 22 June 2009. |
|
16 |
DA09/061 |
5/03/09 |
That Council review the
Carparking Section 94 plan for Nambucca Heads.. |
GM |
Target report to Council in July
2009. Report to consider priorities
for contribution plan reviews. |
17 |
SF791 |
19/03/09 |
That
a report go back to the Land Development Committee on the outcome of
advertising for expressions of interest for the purchase and development of
industrial land in Nambucca Heads. |
GM |
Report to come
back following advertising. DES to
investigate potential for closure of part of the road to add to the
industrial land. Surveyor to
identify services and boundaries. |
APRIL 2009 |
|||||
18 |
SF939 |
2/04/09 |
Views
of Chambers of Commerce, Nambucca Valley Tourism and High Schools be sought
as to proposed marketing slogan and billboards and alternative suggestions |
GM |
To be reported back in August 2009 |
19 |
SF871 |
16/04/09 |
That the future of the Pioneer
Community Centre be subject to a further report to Council in 3 months time
following receipt of any proposal from the CoM to retain the building. Also Council seek the flat be
vacated and obtain insurance details. |
GM |
Report in August
2009. Letter sent 20/4/09 to CoM
requesting that the flat be vacated and requesting insurance details. Committee of
Management wish to be provided with reasons as to why the flat should be
vacated (verbal advice to GM on 22/5/09). Committee of
Management advised that vacancy of flat recommended by the report on the
building’s fire safety (by letter on 23/6/09). |
20 |
SF959 |
16/04/09 |
Sub-Committee continue a
review of Draft Management Plan so that it can be presented to Council in
March 2010. |
GM |
A report is to be
prepared to the Sub-Committee on a staged process for reviewing the Draft
Management Plan. Report to be
completed by June 2009. Subcommittee
to report by March 2010. |
21 |
SF1305 |
16/04/09 |
Council make representations
to the Minister for Emergency Services and Minister for Roads to seek funding
for the repair of landslips in Nambucca Heads which occurred as a consequence
of the flood events in February and March 2009. Also that Council make representations to
the Insurance Council for the provision of insurance for land slip damage. |
GM |
Letters sent 21
April 2009. Follow-up letter
sent 28 May 2009. DES to write to
RTA requesting a program as to when they will make determinations and when
emergency funds will be available. |
22 |
RF477 |
16/04/09 |
That Council write to |
DES |
Letter of request
forwarded on 1 May 2009. Date set for 2.00
pm on Monday 29 June 2009. |
23 |
SF444 |
16/04/09 |
That the revised road
hierarchy plan, incorporating a grading program be deferred to the next GPC
meeting with Councillors to provide any comments to Acting DES within 7 days. |
DES |
Report to GPC 17
June 2009. Deferred to GPC
July 2009. |
MAY 2009 |
|||||
24 |
SF851 |
7/05/09 |
That Council receive a report
on progress and a timeline for completion of Stage 1 of the Climate
Protection Program and that the report also identify the staffing resources
and funds needed to complete the project. |
DES |
To be considered
with report on administrative staff due July 2009. |
25 |
SF959 |
07/05/09
& 4/6/09 |
That the report concerning
Wia-Ora sand and gravel quarry consider options for calling in bonds to
undertake works. |
DEP |
Council again
write to Dept Water & Energy Letter sent 10
June 2009. |
26 |
SF639 |
07/05/09 |
That the staffing of the
Department of Environment and Planning be reviewed in 6 months or upon
resignation of any professional staff member, whichever occurs first. |
GM |
Report to
Consultative Committee 8 July 2009 and Council 16 July 2009. |
27 |
SF639 |
07/05/09 |
Council receive a report
relating to the need for administrative support across the organisation. |
GM |
Report to
Consultative Committee 8 July 2009 and Council 16 July 2009. |
28 |
SF21 |
07/05/09 |
Council investigate the
implementation and costs of an effluent management system at the saleyards |
GM |
August 2009 |
29 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Allocation for retaining wall
at Little Beach be deferred for consideration at the September Quarterly
Review |
DES |
November 2009 |
30 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Council consider a report on
the operation of the saleyards as a business unit and what, if any, subsidy
is to be applied to its operations. |
GM |
November 2009 |
31 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Council review the cycleway
plan so as to ensure its funding requirements are realistic. |
DES |
December 2009 |
32 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Council receive a report on
the funding and use of the reserves for the Council Chambers Upkeep, Self
Insurance and Tourist Centre Upkeep. |
GM |
September 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
SF1269 |
21/05/09 |
Council write to Parliamentary
Secretary for Roads seeking assurance that the |
DES |
Letter sent 18
June 2009. |
35 |
SF820 |
21/05/09 |
That the draft tree planting
program for 2009/10 be referred to Council for its consideration. |
DES |
Report July 2009 |
36 |
SF1231 |
21/05/09 |
Use of Road Reserves and
public land for commercial, community and charitable activities – that there
be a further report to consider items 1-6 in the letter from the Chamber of
Commerce. |
DEP |
Report in August
2009. Meeting scheduled
for 5.00 pm 16 June 2009 with Chambers of Commerce. Formal responses
requested from participants by end July 2009 for presentation to Access
Committee before finalising policy. |
37 |
SF452 |
21/05/09 |
Council seek from the Minister
for the Environment acceptance that the sampling data for the old landfill
indicate down stream impacts are minimal and re-installation of the leachate
interception trench is not justifiable. |
DES |
Local DECC office
advised by letter of Council’s intention. Formal proposal
for Minister being prepared. |
38 |
SF452 |
21/05/09 |
Council consider the provision
of additional monitoring bores at the landfill with a report on the cost for
installation and monitoring. |
DES |
Report to July
2009. proceeding to
provide 3 addition monitoring bores at the Cost of $3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JUNE 2009 |
|||||
40 |
SF1269 |
4/6/2009 |
Report on options for
pedestrian safety for |
DES |
Report September
GPC. Preliminary
concepts commenced. |
41 |
SF639 |
4/6/2009 |
Review of Tourism Function |
GM |
Deferred to 16
September GPC |
|
|
|
|
|
This matter has
been deemed an operation issue and a separate memo has been issued to all
Councillors advising the actions in the matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
SF1131 |
18/6/2009 |
That the RTA be requested to
contribute 50% of the funding to undertake repair of the landslip below Jason
Cottages and the matter be reviewed at the budget review for the June 2009
quarter. |
DES |
To be considered
at September 2009 GPC. Letter sent to
RTA. |
47 |
SF750 |
18/6/2009 |
That the report on S138
applications, bonds and footpath specifications be deferred so as to enable
more information to be provided on the standard of concrete |
DEP DES |
Report to be
resubmitted to July GPC meeting. |
48 |
RF256 |
18/6/2009 |
That the RTA be requested to
contribute 50% of the funding for the works required to stabilise |
DES |
|
49 |
SF382 |
18/6/2009 |
Council clarify ownership of
the land (associated with the draft Scotts Head Reserve Masterplan) before
proceeding further and when the information is obtained that Council proceed
with a workshop and site visit to determine its position. |
DES |
|
There are no
attachments for this report.
2 July 2009 |
General Manager's
Report
ITEM 9.2 SF706 020709 Grant
Application Status Report - 23 June 2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Jenny Chance,
Grants Officer
Summary: At Council’s meeting on 7 December 2006 it was resolved that there be a quarterly return submitted to Council on grant programs. |
That the list of grant programs and their status to
23 June 2009 be received. |
APPROVED GRANTS—SECURED BY GRANTS OFFICER
Grant |
Funding Amount |
Description |
NSW Maritime – Maritime Infrastructure Program |
$53,220 |
Pontoon
and Gangway at Pontoon
and Gangway at |
NSW Blackspot
Program |
$34,000 |
Pedestrian
refuge at |
Department of Families, Housing,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs – Volunteers Grants Program |
$11,179 |
Nambucca
District Little Athletics – Computer, camera and filing cabinets. Nambucca
Heads Junior Nambucca
Heads Touch Football – Computer and a photocopier. |
NSW Attorney
General’s Department – NSW Crime Prevention Grant |
$54,527 |
Program to assist licensed premises to implement strategies
towards a safer environment for women. |
Department of
Planning - NSW Coastline Cycleway Grants
Program |
$75,000 |
Funding
for shared pedestrian/cycleway along |
Department of
Climate Change – Local Adaptation Pathways Program |
$140,000 |
Funding to assist |
Department of Sport
and Recreation – Capital Assistance Program |
$8,600 |
Nambucca Tennis Club lighting
upgrade. |
Department of
Environment and Climate Change - Regional Regulated Area
Council Grant |
$14,000 |
To assist with costs associated with
weighbridge at Nambucca Waste Management Facility |
Department of Local Government – Playground
Upgrades |
$19,551 |
Install border and softfall to |
TOTAL |
$410,077 |
|
SUBMITTED
APPLICATIONS
|
Grant Program |
Action |
Grant Details and Status |
|
1 |
Department of Community Services
(NSW) – Area Assistance Scheme Funding basis: Fully Funded up to $110,000 Opens: Applications Submitted Closed: 10 October
2008 Outcome: Successful applications to be announced mid 2009 Grant 1:$45,000 Grant 2:$110,000 Grant 3:$30,700 Grant 4:$24,761 |
GO |
The Area Assistance Scheme (AAS) is a regional community
development program run by the Communities Division, NSW Department of
Community Services. The AAS provides grants to local Councils and
non-government not-for-profit organisations for projects that improve
community well being and how communities function. The AAS works within a
whole-of-government framework to deliver its outcomes. In 2008/09 the AAS
will funds project between $10 000 and $110 000. Council submitted or assisted in the following
applications: 1) Argents Hill Hall – Improvements to hall including
general maintenance and structural works. 2) 3) Warrell Creek Hall – Improvements to hall including
insulating part of the building and adding exhaust fans, new floor coverings
in kitchen, refurbishing of stage area, fencing and boundary restoration
works, new footpath, water tank, installation of alarm device for the septic
overflow tank, new bbq, shade area and picnic tables. 4) Unkya Reserve – Improvements including new |
|
2 |
Department of Local Government –
Playground Upgrades Funding basis: Fully Funded up to $20,000 Opens: Application Submitted Closed: 21 November 2008 Outcome:
Successful Grant: $20,000.00 |
GO/ MBS |
A total of $2 million has been made available over two years.
Round 1 grants for 2008/09 have been allocated and The grants will only be available for local government and must
be used to either provide new playground facilities and/or equipment or
upgrade existing playground facilities and/or equipment. Councils must
utilise grants received for playground projects on land which is All An application was submitted to install border and
softfall to |
3 |
National Emergency Volunteer Support Fund – Emergency Management Funding basis: Fully Funded Opens:
Application Submitted Closing: 6
March 2009 Outcome: Successful applications announcement in
July 2009 Grant:
$150,000 |
GO |
The National Emergency
Volunteer Support Fund focuses on emergency management volunteers in
recognition of their needs and the significant front line role they play in
reducing vulnerability and enhancing community safety. To ensure ongoing
protection of communities it is critical that all volunteer agencies maintain
their current levels of staffing and training. The Australian
Government is offering funding in 2009/10 through the National Emergency
Volunteer Support Fund for projects which specifically address the recruitment,
retention and training of volunteers. Application submitted by Nambucca River
Volunteer Marine Rescue Squad. |
4 |
Country Halls Renewal Fund Funding basis: 2:1 Opens:
Currently Open Closing: Always
Open Outcome: Grant 1: $50,000 Council contribution: $0.00 Grant 2: $12,754.13 Grant 3:: $17,052.00 Grant 4:: $TBA Grant 5: $4,560.80 Grant 6: $50,000 Grant 7: 23,246.50 |
GO |
$2.5 million over 5 years towards renewing
country halls. The fund will be delivered by the Office of Rural Affairs. Applications are currently being prepared
for: 1) Argents Hill Hall – Repairs 2) Nambucca Entertainment Centre –
External painting 3) Taylors Arm Hall – Kitchen, flooring
and windows 4) Burrapine Hall – Repairs 5) Bowraville CWA Hall – Painting and repairs 6) Nambucca Senior Citizens Hall – Painting, flooring and
repairs 7) Talarm Hall – General repairs Notice of the
program has been distributed to the Committees of Management for the halls |
5 |
Norman
Wettenhall Foundation Funding basis: Fully Funded
up to $10,000 Opens:
Application Submitted Closing: 31
March 2009 Outcome: Unsuccessful Grant 1: $10,000 |
GO |
Support is given
to projects that enhance or maintain the vitality and diversity of the
Australian natural living environment. The objectives
of the Foundation are: · to build capacity in local communities to effect
long-term beneficial change in the natural environment · to support and encourage research into, and
monitoring of, all aspects of · to support education relating to our natural
environment · Principles Pre-approval
to lodge a submission has been received for funding towards seating and
signage for the Crosswinds Wetlands Reserve.
An application has been submitted. |
6 |
The Department of Infrastructure,
Transport, Regional Development and Local Government – Indigenous Road Safety
Grants Funding basis: Fully funded
up to $30,000 Opens:
Application Submitted Closing: 27
March 2009 Outcome: To be
advised in June 2009 Grant: $30,000 |
MTS/GO |
The Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government is now inviting applications for Indigenous Road Safety Grants for 2009-2010. One or more grants up to a total of $30,000 will be awarded to applicants for projects that will help improve road safety for Indigenous people. Application forms and detailed information about the grants are available from the Department’s website. Objectives The grant is offered as a means to: · encourage innovative and worthwhile initiatives to help reduce road trauma affecting Indigenous people; and · increase the range of initiatives available to address road safety for Indigenous people. An application
has been prepared to fund engineering works, informative signage at |
7 |
Department of
Environment and Climate Change – NSW Climate Change Fund – Public Facilities
Program Funding basis: Fully funded Opens:
Application prepared Closing: 30
April 2009 Outcome: TBA Grant: $463,515 Council contribution: $14,040
(in-kind) |
GO/ TOA |
$30m for water and energy saving projects in facilities
open to the public eg schools, community buildings, sporting facilities,
museums and art galleries. Eligibility criteria Applications are open to providers of non-profit public
or educational facilities for projects which: § publicly demonstrate how water and/or energy savings can
work § stimulate investment in innovative ways to save, harvest
and recycle water and/or reduce overall energy consumption (and related
greenhouse emissions) and/or peak electricity demand. An application submitted for funding towards lighting and
air conditioning system upgrade in Council’s |
8 |
Australian
Government – Caring for our Country funding Funding basis: Fully funded Opens:
Application submitted Closing: 6
March 2009 Outcome: TBA Grant: $100,000 |
GO |
Caring for our Country funding The Australian Government is now calling
for investment proposals for projects that will meet the targets outlined in
the Caring for our Country business plan 2009-10. Caring for our Country is
an Australian Government initiative that seeks to achieve an environment that
is healthy, better protected, well managed and resilient, and provides
essential ecosystem services in a changing climate. The Australian Government is seeking
investment proposals for landscape-scale projects that achieve one or more
targets in specific geographic locations or key assets. Projects can be large, medium
or small: · large-scale projects in the
order of $20 million over four years · medium-scale projects of up to
$3 million per annum (a value of $2-3 million would be expected for most
medium-scale projects) · small-scale projects of between
$20,000 and $100,000 per annum. Council is working together with Landcare
to submit an application that includes weed removal, field days, workshops
and other on ground works and will involve a small devolved grant scheme for
land owners and community groups. |
9 |
Local Infrastructure Support Fund – Building the Country Package – Department of State and Regional
Development – Expression of Interest Funding basis: Fully Funded Opens:
Application submitted Closing: 20
March 2009 Outcome:
Unsuccessful Grant: $100,000 |
GO/PO |
$52 million over 5 years supporting
infrastructure projects that are directly linked to economic development
opportunities. The fund will be delivered by the Department of State and
Regional Development. Application
submitted for infrastructure works at Macksville Saleyards. |
10 |
NRMA – Community Grants Program Funding basis: Fully funded
up to $5,000 Opens:
Application submitted Closing: 25
March 2009 Outcome: TBA Grant 1: $4,998 Grant 2: $5,000 |
GO |
The Community Grants Program provides funding to
support community and not for profit organisations that are making our
communities safer, particularly in the areas of crime prevention, road
safety, emergency readiness and response, and the environment. 1) Funding towards solar hot water system
at E J Biffin Fields 2) Funding towards production of brochure
for Crosswinds |
11 |
Jobs Fund Funding basis: Fully funded Opens:
Application submitted Closing: 22 May
2009 Outcome: TBA Grant 1: $4,500,000 Grant 2: $441,350 |
GO/MTS/MWS |
The Jobs Fund is a
$650 million Australian Government initiative to support and create jobs and
increase skills through innovative projects that build community
infrastructure and increase social capital in local communities across the
country. Through the Jobs Fund the Government will invest in one-off capital
projects and provide seed funding for social enterprises. The Jobs Fund is a
temporary resource. The aim of the Jobs Fund is to produce long-term
improvements in communities affected by the global economic downturn. The
Jobs Fund projects will focus on directly generating jobs for people in
communities with already high unemployment levels, rising jobless rates or
which are particularly vulnerable. 1) Funding towards
Nambucca Sewerage Treatment Plant upgrade 2) Funding towards cycleway in |
12 |
Environmental Restoration and Rehabilitation Grants Funding basis: Fully Funded
up to $100,000 Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 29 May 2009 Outcome: TBA Grant: $100,000 |
GO/PO |
The aim of the
Restoration and Rehabilitation (R&R) program is to facilitate projects to
prevent or reduce pollution, the waste stream or environmental degradation of
any kind, run by community organisations and State and Local government
organisations. Through these projects, we also aim to improve the capacity of
communities and organisations to protect, restore and enhance the
environment. The Objectives of the Environmental Restoration
and Rehabilitation Program are: to restore degraded environmental resources, including rare and endangered ecosystems to protect important ecosystems and habitats of rare and endangered flora and fauna to prevent or minimize future environmental damage to enhance the quality of specific environmental resources to improve the capacity of eligible organisations to protect, restore and enhance the environment to undertake resource recovery and waste avoidance projects and to prevent and/or reduce pollution. Application prepared for Macksville Saleyards |
13 |
Country Passenger Transport Infrastructure Grants
Scheme (CPTIGS) – Ministry of Transport Funding basis: Fully Funded Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 25 June 09 Outcome: TBA Grant: $100,000 approx |
GO/MTS |
The Country Passenger Transport Infrastructure Grants Scheme (CPTIGS) is administered by the Ministry of Transport. It provides support funding to improve the amenity of passenger transport infrastructure in rural, regional and remote communities of NSW Who Can Apply? Local government, incorporated community organisations, transport operators and other interested organisations that have a current Australian Business Number are eligible. Application prepared for upgrade of Cook Street Interchange, Bowraville. |
FUNDING PROGRAMS
RECENTLY OPENED OR SOON TO BE RELEASED — FOR INFORMATION
|
Grant Program |
Status |
1 |
Building the Country Package Funding basis: Various Opens:
Currently Open Closing:
Various |
Building the Country Package announced by
the Rees Government. The funding programs are designed to
support people who live and work in country areas. |
2 |
Arts NSW – Project Funding Funding basis: Various Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 6 July 2009 |
Project
Funding through application All eligible applicants can apply for Project
Funding through the application process set out in the 2010 Arts Funding
Program Guidelines. Funding is offered for four specific purposes: Capital – A contribution of up to 50 per cent towards
the development of arts and cultural infrastructure that increases access to
purpose-designed and well-managed facilities, including multi-purpose
facilities and hubs. Up to
$100,000 but funding up to $250,000 may be considered in exceptional
circumstances; Creation and/or Presentation –
Support for any stage in the creative development and/or public presentation
of arts and cultural work. – up to $30,000 for a creative development,
or – up to $30,000 for a public
presentation, or – up to $60,000 for an application
including both creative development and public presentation; Performing Arts Touring –
Support for greater access to professional performing arts programs
throughout NSW. No limit; Strategic
Industry Development – Support
for projects with sustainable long-term outcomes for the development of the
arts and cultural industry in NSW. Up to $50,000 per annum. |
3 |
Regional Arts Fund Funding basis: 1:1 Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 14 August 2009 |
Categories for the Regional Arts Fund include: 1 New Initiatives This category assists groups to undertake projects in any artform
that: extend knowledge, participation and/or development of arts and culture
within communities; address cultural themes or issues of significance in
local communities; are initiated by and with the community; provide
opportunities for collaboration and skills development of locally based arts
workers. 2 Partnerships This category assists groups to undertake projects in any artform
that: assist in the development of sustainable cultural networks; promote partnerships that support community and cultural exchange;
have long-term arts and community cultural development outcomes for
communities; are initiated by and with the community. Partnerships can be
with the non-arts sectors and specific target groups either within
communities, between towns, within regions or across the state. |
4 |
Funding basis: Fully Funded
for community groups, Council requires matching funds Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 10 August 2009 |
The NSW Government’s
$35 million Community Building Partnership program will support local jobs,
stimulate growth and improve community facilities. Community groups and
local The NSW Community
Building Partnership will invest $300,000 into building local community
projects in every electoral district – with an additional $100,000 to be
invested in electoral districts with higher unemployment. |
5 |
Jobs Fund – 2nd Round Funding basis: Fully funded
– Council contribution highly regarded Opens: Opening
soon – however as Nambucca Shire has recently been listed as a prioritised
area, applications can be submitted now. Closing: 10 August 2009 |
The $650 million is part of the Government’s Jobs and Training
Compact. The Jobs Fund will support and create jobs and improve skills,
by funding projects that build community infrastructure and create social
capital in local communities. $300 million Local Jobs stream to support community infrastructure
projects with a focus on the promotion of environment-friendly technology and
heritage $200 million Get Communities Working stream for self-sustaining
projects which create jobs and provide activities and services to improve
community amenity $150 million Infrastructure Employment Projects stream for investment
in infrastructure projects which generate jobs in regions affected by the
economic downturn. |
6 |
NSW Local Infrastructure Fund Funding basis: Loan over 10
year term Opens:
Currently Open Closing: 31 August 2009 |
The $200 million NSW Local Infrastructure Fund has been established as
an 'interest free' loan scheme to bring forward infrastructure projects that
are delayed due to a lack of funding. The funding will provide an immediate local economic boost as water,
sewer, drainage and roads infrastructure projects are provided for local
communities. The funding will also trigger construction in areas of high population
growth and will assist in increasing the supply of serviced land for housing
and employment. The NSW Local Infrastructure Fund is a NSW Treasury Fund administered
by the NSW Department of Planning. Eligible projects Funding is provided for local projects that will support urban
development – typically roads and related infrastructure, stormwater, water
and wastewater projects. Only projects costing at least $1 million will be
funded. |
For Council’s
information, as at 23 June 2009, the Grants Officer has applied for 48 grants
totalling $9,071,597.
Of that total Council has been notified that grants in the amount of $39,0526 have
been successfully approved. The
remainder are still to be determined.
There are no attachments for this report.
2 July
2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.3 SF769 020709 Reclassification of the Bowraville -
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter, General Manager
Summary: Council has been
advised by the Roads and Traffic Authority that following a review of NSW
road classifications by a panel chaired by the former President of the NSW
Shires Association and Australian Local Government Association, Mr Mike
Montgomery, the classification of the Bowraville to |
1 That Council make representations in
conjunction with Bellingen Shire Council to the Roads and Traffic Authority
and also to the Minister for Roads, the Hon. Michael Daley MP objecting to
the change in classification of the Bowraville to Bellingen Road from a
Regional Road to a Local Road. 2 That the Mayor of Bellingen Shire
Council be requested to participate in a deputation with the Mayor of
Nambucca Shire Council to the Minister for Roads to express the Councils’
concerns in relation to the withdrawal of funding. |
OPTIONS:
There are options in
relation to how Council should best lobby for the retention of the
DISCUSSION:
Council has received the
attached correspondence from
the Roads and Traffic Authority.
By way of background, a
review of road classification was commenced in 2004 with a series of regional
interviews in 2006. At that time, the
Mayor and Director Engineering Services made a submission on behalf of this
Council seeking the retention of the
a) it
being the only alternative to the
b) its
importance as a tourist route
c) its
importance to some residents who travel directly between Bellingen and
Bowraville
d) funding
considerations – Council simply cannot afford to lose any part of the
In essence, as part of
an overall reduction of regional roads in NSW by some 230 kilometres, the
Bowraville to
Council is responsible
for the maintenance of the road which has a length of 14.7km within the
Nambucca local government area. This
maintenance includes bitumen patching, maintenance grading and roadside mowing. There are also three bridges on the road
which will require replacement.
Given this liability,
the loss of an estimated $75,000 per annum in funding will be keenly felt.
On the basis of the
letter supplied by the Roads and Traffic Authority, the net reduction of 5
kilometres of State Roads and 230 kilometres of Regional Roads is a significant
shifting of costs from the State Government to local government. It would seem that given the length of such
roads in NSW, that both Nambucca and Bellingen Councils are bearing a disproportionate
burden of this cost shifting.
Council should make
representations in conjunction with Bellingen Shire Council to the Roads and
Traffic Authority and also to the Minister for Roads, the Hon. Michael Daley MP
objecting to the change in classification of the Bowraville to
Despite the Minister’s
news release that, “the Rees Government will boost road funding for local
Councils”, the case for the
CONSULTATION:
There has been
consultation with Bellingen Shire Council.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no implications for the environment.
Social
There are important social implications as access needs to be provided
for residents along the road and also for tourists using the route.
Economic
Because the road is a tourist route it has important economic
implications for both the Bellingen and Nambucca local government areas.
Risk
There is no discernible risk in making representations for the
restoration of this roads funding.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
The impact on Council’s budget is estimated
to be -$75,000 per annum.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There are no implications for working funds
as there are transition arrangements.
1View |
15545/2009 - Reclassification of |
|
Ordinary Council Meeting - 2 July 2009 Reclassification of the
Bowraville - |
Attachment
1 15545/2009
- Reclassification of |
2 July
2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.4 SF600 020709 Purchase of Macksville East Public School Site -
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter, General Manager
Summary: The Department
of Education and Training have now advised they are prepared to accept
Council’s offer to purchase The acceptance of the
offer is good news and will save Council the substantial cost of
re-establishing the Council should
proceed to acquire the land. |
1 That Council enter into a contract for
the purchase of · A
restriction that the land cannot be used for a non government school · A
positive covenant that the land be used only for community purposes · That
any part of the land not be onsold without the approval of the Minister for
Education and Training and a Caveat be lodged for that purpose. 2 That the land be classified as
“operational”. 3 Council offer the Nambucca District
Cricket Association a 20 year lease of the land at nominal rental, subject to
them being responsible for all insurances and maintenance. 4 Council affix its seal
to any documents as required. 5 That Council thank the Minister, the
Hon. Verity Firth and radio host Ray Hadley for their intervention in the
matter. 6 That Council suggest to the Nambucca
District Cricket Association that the field be named the “Phillip Hughes
Oval” and that Mr Hughes be invited to a naming ceremony at the completion of
his current cricketing commitments. |
OPTIONS:
Council could reject the
Department’s offer.
DISCUSSION:
At Council’s meeting on
21 May 2009 it was resolved as follows:
1. Council forward an immediate offer to
purchase the land based on its value as 1(a2) flood liable high hazard storage
agricultural land without a dwelling entitlement.
2. In the event that Council is successful in acquiring
the land, Council advise the Nambucca District Cricket Association that Council
will lease them the use of the land at a nominal rental, subject to them being
responsible for all insurances and maintenance.
3. If the land is acquired then it be classified
as operational.
The Mayor has now
received a response from the Department of Education and Training to her letter
of 25 May which is attached.
The acceptance of the
offer is good news and will save Council the substantial cost of re-establishing
the
Council has previously
resolved that the land, when acquired, be classified as “operational”. The operational classification will mean that
Council is not obliged to prepare a plan of management for the land nor will it
need to provide any public notice of a lease or licence exceeding 5 years or
seek the Minister’s consent if there are objections to the granting of a lease
or licence. As the land is proposed to
be the subject of a long term lease to the Nambucca District Cricket
Association with the Association being responsible for all insurances and
maintenance, an “operational” classification is appropriate.
CONSULTATION:
There has been
consultation with Council’s Manager Financial Services and Council’s Property
Officer.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
The use of
Social
There are very positive social implications in providing a good quality
cricket oval. Cricket has always been a
popular Australian team sport, not just as a spectacle but in developing
leadership and team skills in our youth.
Economic
There are no significant economic implications.
Risk
There are no discernible risks.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
No provision has been made for the purchase
of the land in Council’s budget for 2009/2010.
Investigations are being undertaken into the funding of the purchase
from Section 94 funds. Any residual will
need to be met from working funds.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
At this stage the impact on working funds
has not been determined but will not exceed $25,000.
1View |
15303/2009 Acceptance of offer to purchase |
|
Ordinary Council Meeting - 2 July 2009 Purchase of |
Attachment
1 15303/2009
Acceptance of offer to purchase |
2 July
2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.1 SF736 020709 Aboriginal Child Youth and Family Strategy and Changes to Youth
Services at Council
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Coral
Summary: For the past 5 years Council has received funding from the Department of Community Services (under its Aboriginal Child Youth and Family Strategy) to employ an Aboriginal Youth Worker and conduct activities during School Holidays. This report will provide Council with an update on changes being proposed by the Department of Community Services and will follow on from a report presented by Council’s Youth Development Officer on 5 February 2009 when Council resolved to: 1 Note the information and await a
future report when there is formal notification of any changes. 2 Write to the Department of Community
Services supporting the recommendation that the funding be transferred to the
Better Futures initiative. Council is advised that: · Funding for Better Futures has not yet been made available for the Mid North Coast. · The Youth Worker service will remain funded under the Aboriginal Child Youth and Family Strategy. · The funding levels are now classified as “one-off” and not recurrent. · Formal advice that DoCS is no longer funding School Holiday Activities has now been received. · There will be a small July 2009 holiday program with the unexpended funds from 2008-09. · Whilst funding for 2009-10 will remain at 2008-09 levels, the focus will be on Bowraville. |
1 That Council note
that for the time being, funding for the Aboriginal Youth Worker project will
remain with the Department of Community Services under its Aboriginal Child
Youth and Family, Strategy and further, that the funding is now regarded as
being “one-off” and therefore concludes at the end of 2009-10. 2 That Council note
and endorse a change in focus for the Aboriginal Youth Worker project in that
it will be focussed on Bowraville for 2009-10, further noting that this is at
the instigation of the funding authority and not Council. 3 That a review of
the strategic direction for the Aboriginal Youth Worker project will be
undertaken early 2010 or possibly before if there are changes to funding
programs by the State Government. |
OPTIONS:
Council
has the option of not accepting funding under the proposed changes.
DISCUSSION:
Background
For some months now, Council has been aware that the Aboriginal Youth Worker project (essentially the 3-day per week Youth Worker position) and the School Holiday Activities have been under review and that possible changes were likely. The Youth Development Officer’s report to Council 5 February 2009 outlined this is some detail and therefore won’t be repeated in this report. This report is focussing on the future.
“School
Since 2005, Council has received funding from the Department of Community Services to conduct activities during School Holidays as a proactive and positive approach to preventing boredom and juvenile crime. Over the past 5 years, there has been over 40 different types of activities including workshops, entertainment, sport and recreation, culture and education.
The Department has moved its funding towards a more results-based approach with a focus on purchasing outcomes. The result is that funding for all school holiday programs concludes 30 June 2009; and on 31 March 2009 Council received formal advice to this affect.
A small program is planned for the holidays in July 2009 utilising the unexpended funds from 2008-09 however, this will essentially conclude a regular program during the 4 annual school holiday periods.
Changes to Funding
Council’s 2009-10 budget for the Youth Worker project will remain at 2008-09 levels due to a one-off payment. The level of funding (and whether or not funding will even be available) for 2010-11 is not known at this time, as the funding is now classified as “one-off” and not “recurrent”.
The funding will remain with the Aboriginal Child Youth and Family Strategy but the conditions of funding will be different for 2009-10.
Change
of Focus for the Youth Worker program
Council is advised that the Department of Community Services is requiring that the project will have a focus on Bowraville, but may run a small number of activities in other areas of the Shire.
The age group being targeted will remain at 12 to 17 year-olds.
Funding
will permit the employment of the Aboriginal Youth Worker in a full-time
capacity for 2009-10.
Council
staff are currently conducting meetings with the Department of Community
Services to discuss the implementation of this new approach. Following that, it
will be necessary to meet with key agencies, Elders etc in Bowraville to
determine a series of activities to be conducted by the Youth Worker throughout
the coming year.
Council
will be well aware of the tightening of funding generally and is therefore
encouraged to support this change in approach at least in the short-term and in
line with its previously stated position that the activities are managed to the
available funding provided.
The
funding authority and Bowraville community will need to be aware that
arrangements and the strategic direction beyond 2009-10 would need to be
reviewed early in 2010, noting that Council is unlikely to be in a financial
position to continue the project if the funding is further reduced or
withdrawn.
CONSULTATION:
Director
Environment & Planning
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There are no environmental issues identified.
Social
The Youth Worker project is based on improved social
outcomes for children and young people in Bowraville.
Economic
Nothing identified
Risk
There are risks associated with delivering a program
focussed on one community as distinct from being shire-wide, including raising
community expectations, creating a reliance on that service/program and a
reduced capacity to respond to needs in other areas and towns. Council also
runs the risk that at the conclusion of 12 months the removal of a Bowraville
focus will be interpreted as a withdrawal of a service to Bowraville by
Council. Council will need to be up-front with the community in regard to this
project to avoid the expectation that it will be ongoing.
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS:
Direct and indirect impact on current and future budgets
At this stage it is unknown whether funding for the Youth Worker and associated programs will be available beyond 2009-10.
Source of fund and any variance to working funds
The position and related programs are fully funded from external sources.
There are no
attachments for this report.
2 July
2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.2 SF1234 020709 NSW Sport and Recreation Traineeship
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Coral
Summary: Council may recall that during
2008, there were successful negotiations with the NSW Department of Sport and
Recreation regarding Council hosting a trainee for a 12 month period. The
employer would be the Australian Training Company and NSW Sport and
Recreation would provide the funding. This report is to advise Council that the NSW Sport and Recreation traineeship has now been filled, and the trainee, Mr Daniel Hill commences Monday 29 June 2009. |
1 That Council note
that the Sport and Recreation trainee will be commencing Monday 29 June 2009
for a period of 12 months. |
OPTIONS:
The report is for information.
DISCUSSION:
In May 2008, Council was approached by the NSW Department of Sport and Recreation regarding the possibility of acting as a host for a Sport and Recreation Trainee for the Nambucca Shire. The creation of this position (together with one at Kempsey Shire Council) was in recognition that the previous services of a Development Officer had been withdrawn from the community due to changes in funding from the Federal Government.
Council was
approached with this proposal and supported this concept in principle however,
chose to delay the placement pending the successful recruitment of vacancies in
Aboriginal positions as these people would act as mentors for a trainee. On Thursday 5 June 2008 Council resolved, that:
Council advise the NSW Department of Sport and
Recreation that it is currently not in a position to provide an Aboriginal
Sports Trainee position with the necessary supervision and mentoring support
but that it would be pleased to review the offer in six months following the
anticipated appointments to the key positions of Youth Worker (Aboriginal) and
Community Development Officer (Aboriginal).
The NSW Department of Sport &
Recreation was notified of this resolution and 'extended the traineeship offer
to a further six (6) months upon appointments of key Aboriginal positions'.
That being so and with both
successful appointments to the positions of the Aboriginal Youth Worker and the
Community Development Officer, the review of the trainee position and the
appointment of the Sport & Recreation trainee have been completed and commencement of the
position is due Monday 29 June 2009.
A few of the key operational responsibilities of the trainee are to:
· liaise with the Aboriginal community, discussing needs and promoting participation in sport and recreation
· Provide an awareness of programs and vacation activities to local schools and organisations
· Planning and delivering programs and services and the monitoring of the outcomes.
The traineeship is for one (1) year only and has output measures of on-the-job training, knowledge of internal functions within Council and a successful completion of Certificate II in Sport and Recreation.
CONSULTATION:
Manager
Community and Cultural Services Coral
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
Nil
Social
It is envisaged that there will be considerable social benefits with this position.
Economic
Nil
Risk
Nil
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct and indirect impact on current and future budgets
This position is externally
funded for a period of 12 months with no ongoing commitment. The fully funded
traineeship by the NSW Department of Sport & Recreation, is budgeted to
provide for wages and the development and/or the delivery of programs.
Source of fund and any variance to working funds
Nil
There are no
attachments for this report.
2 July
2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.3 SF1232 020709 Report on Review of Nambucca Shire Council - On-site Sewage
Management Plan
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Neil Pengilly, Senior Health and Building Surveyor
Summary: Council will recall dealing with a report at its General Purpose Committee on 17 December, 2008 in relation to a review of Council’s On-site Sewage Management Plan 1999. Council resolved that the draft Plan be placed on public exhibition and a further report be prepared for Council’s consideration. The draft
On-site Sewage Management Plan 2009 was subsequently placed on public
exhibition, being advertised within the Submissions were received from three (3) consultants and two (2) plumbing practitioners. Copies of all submissions and a précis of the comments are attached. The main issues raised within the submissions are discussed within this report A copy of the revised draft On-site Sewage Management Plan 2009 is also attached. |
1 That
the draft Nambucca Shire Council On-site Sewage Management Plan 2009 be
adopted. 2 That
authors of all submissions be advised of Council’s resolution. 3 That the adopted plan be placed on
Council’s website with relevant fact sheets and checklists. |
OPTIONS:
Council has the following options:
1 To adopt the draft On-site Sewage Management Plan 2009, as recommended;
2 Require further modification of the draft Plan prior to adoption; or
3 Resolve not to adopt the draft Plan.
DISCUSSION:
During the consultation process, submissions were received from three (3) on-site sewage management consultants and two (2) plumbing practitioners.
Whilst appreciating that the design considerations are consistent for the assessment of all on-site sewage management systems, the submissions show distinct variation in their content and it is clear that different consultants/practitioners have differing viewpoints as to the most appropriate form of wastewater disposal.
Many matters raised within the submissions related to minor amendments involving clarification of requirements, revision of terminology and/or provision of additional information. These amendments have been addressed within the revised plan.
Other matters raised are discussed as follows:
i) Exclusion of
absorption trenches for onsite disposal.
Two submissions argue that the use of absorption trenches (normal septic tank installation) within the Shire is not appropriate due to matters such as unsuitable soil characteristics, lack of nutrient reuse and poor performance.
Comment:
Soil mapping undertaken by the Department of Land and Water Conservation identifies many soil profiles within the Shire as unsuitable for effluent disposal by absorption due to a variety of considerations. The mapping, whilst being a valuable tool in the initial assessment of potential systems, is a broad based characterisation of soil profiles and does not indicate variations that may occur within subject properties.
As part of Councils assessment for installation of new systems a site and soil assessment report, specific to the subject site, is required to be submitted. The report includes details of the soil profile and characteristics at the location of the proposed disposal area to assist in identifying any local variations from the broad scale mapping. It is suggested that this site specific assessment provides the best opportunity to optimise the final design/configuration of the on-site system.
With respect to nutrient reuse, it is acknowledged that other forms of disposal (e.g. subsurface irrigation) are more efficient than absorption trenches. Where nutrient uptake is the dominant limitation in the design of the disposal system, the length of absorption trenching required to cater for the nutrients may result in this form of disposal system becoming economically unviable. However, nutrient loading is not always the dominate limitation and the broad based exclusion of absorption trenches is not supported. It should be noted that the use of absorption trenches will be further impacted by the design criteria required under the draft Plan with other forms of disposal systems becoming more viable.
ii) Surface
spray irrigation from aerated wastewater treatment systems (awts).
The draft Plan prohibits disposal of effluent from awts by surface spray irrigation. One submission, whilst agreeing with the intention of the restriction, expressed concern that it may have implications within the awts industry given that surface disposal is permitted under the NSW Department of Health accreditation.
Comment:
The accreditation provides for three forms of disposal, above ground spray irrigation, surface drip irrigation covered by mulch and sub-surface drip irrigation installed at around 100mm depth. The accreditation also states “Each of the three forms of irrigation is subject to the approval of the Council”. As such it is inferred that Council has the authority to refuse certain methods of disposal. Physical separation between humans and effluent disposal is considered a failsafe method in assisting to prevent the spread of disease.
Awts are essentially a compact treatment plant that processes all domestic wastewater from the premises to a tertiary standard (disinfection). There is a concern that in the event of a system failure or where inspection and servicing of the systems has been inadequate, surface spray of insufficiently treated effluent will result in an unsatisfactory risk of human/effluent contact.
iii) Greywater
reuse/separation from blackwater.
Two submissions identified concerns relating to the reuse/separation of greywater from blackwater. The matter has resulted in much debate within the industry as to the advantages/disadvantages of the system. The reuse of greywater was recently approved by legislation however practitioners have raised concern relating to its long term sustainability.
Comment:
The benefits of reuse in relation to water conservation are undeniable, however the characteristics of greywater includes high salt content which over time will degrade the soils capability to accept the disposal of the wastewater. The salt level can be reduced by osmosis. However, this process is not practical with the systems currently available. Not withstanding, the Local Government (General) Regulation, 2005 and the NSW Department of Health currently provides opportunities for the diversion of greywater or reuse (after adequate treatment) and these opportunities have been carried over within the draft On-site Sewage Management Plan 2009.
iv) Concession
for upgrade of existing systems.
Under Section 9.3 of the draft Plan, existing systems that are failing are required to be upgraded. One submission expresses concern that separate criteria is being applied when compared with new systems.
Comments:
The Plan requires the same considerations to be undertaken whether a new or existing system is being addressed. Existing systems will only gain a concession where compliance with new requirements is not physically possible (e.g. where a small property does not permit the required buffers to be achieved).In these circumstances additional measures will need to be incorporated to address the identified deficiency.
A second submission is concerned with how Council will determine who has “appropriate knowledge and experience” when preparing assessments for upgrades of existing systems.
Comment:
Existing systems differ from new installations in that the performance of the existing system provides a “history” as to how that particular design/configuration is suited to the subject site. This “history” is not available for installations on new properties. In this regard, Council will accept reports from suitably qualified plumbers with local knowledge and experience. The report will still need to assess similar criteria as for a new system. Council is still required to assess such a report to ensure it achieves compliance with the Management Plan and Regulations.
v) Ten (10) year
Approval to Operate not supported.
One submission received states that from their experience “trench designs have failed after 7 to 18 years of system use”. The proposed Class 4 system would result in the approval/inspection period being extended at a time when the wastewater disposal area is nearing the end of its effective life.
Comment:
Under Council’s Risk Evaluation (Section 12.1) it was proposed that where a Class 3 system (5 year Approval to Operate) had two consecutive satisfactory inspections the system would be re-classified as a Class 4 (10 year Approval).
The intention of extending the period to a 10 year approval was to reward system operators where the system has a proven record of satisfactory performance and is located such that any failure would have minimal environmental impact.
It is agreed that all wastewater disposal systems have a finite life which is dramatically influenced by various factors such as usage, design and environmental matters. As such the proposed re-classification to Class 4 has been deleted from the Management Plan. It is now proposed that the Class 3 systems will receive an Approval to Operate for a period of 7 years. This will assist in reducing the burden of inspection costs on the property owner while still monitoring the wastewater system for effective over the critical period.
vi) Mandatory
inspection at change of ownership.
Two submissions suggested that mandatory inspection/upgrade of existing systems be undertaken where the subject property undergoes a change of ownership.
Comment:
The Regulations currently require new owners to obtain an Approval to Operate an on-site sewage management systems. When properties are placed on the market a Section 149 Zoning Certificate is required to be obtained. The Certificate identifies whether the property has a current Approval to Operate and a Council form for Change of Details is attached. This form and advice is also included on Council Certificates relating to Outstanding Notices. When Council receives notice of a change in ownership details, the exiting Approval to Operate is transferred into the new owners name and the Approval continues to operate until its expiry date occurs. Council does not “require” the system to be inspected if the current Operating Approval is still valid. The purchaser may, at their discretion, request Council to undertake an inspection of the system to identify any deficiencies.
vii) Buffers
distances to relate to type of disposal system not level of treatment.
Section 11.2 of the draft Plan outlines the requirements for buffer distances for effluent disposal areas. The buffer distances originally related to the “type of treatment” provided to the effluent but have now been amended to reflect the “type of disposal system” utilised. This change provides consistency with the Environment & Health Protection Guidelines.
viii) Inclusion
of soil mapping.
As mentioned above the Department of Land and Water Conservation has produced a document entitled “Soil Landscapes of the Macksville & Nambucca” which includes detailed characteristics of soils found within the Shire. Whilst the maps themselves have not been reproduced (due to logistical and copy right issues) they have been referenced within the draft Plan. Council will further investigate the possible provision of this information on Council’s website subject to the relevant permissions being obtained.
ix) Improved
description/reference to reedbed systems.
Two submissions raised concern relating to the description and references of reedbed systems as described in the draft Plan.
Comment:
Additional information has been included and the description of the system altered to reflect that contained within the submissions.
x) Poor
inspection/assessment by Council.
One submission was critical of Council’s efforts in relation to inspection and assessment of on-site sewage management systems. Examples of systems reportedly failing and being passed by Council were documented.
Comment:
Several of the identified cases are known to Council however, from the comments made within the submission it appears that the author was not aware of the full details. The author was requested to provide property details of the case studies so that Council could initiate further inquires. However, this advice was never received. Notwithstanding, Council’s efforts in the assessment and inspection of systems can be improved.
Documentation required under the draft Plan will allow more critical analysis of a proposed system. In addition the adopted design criteria is expected to result in more durable systems that have a significantly increased lifespan.
CONSULTATION:
In accordance with Clause 77 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, the draft On-site Sewage Management Plan 2009 was placed on public exhibition from 22 January 2009 until 13 March 2009.
The draft Plan was advertised in the Guardian newspaper on 22 January 2009 and 19 February 2009, promoted on Council’s website and formal notification sent to nine (9) on-site sewage management consultants and thirty-nine (39) plumbing contractors who operate within the Shire.
Submissions were received by Council until 13 March 2009.
From the notification process, submissions were received from three (3) consultants and two (2) plumbing contractors. Copies of all submissions are attached and the issues raised are discussed within this report.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
The draft On-site Sewage Management Plan provides a strategy to ensure that the on-site disposal of domestic effluent occurs in a sustainable manner and with minimal adverse impact upon the environment.
Social
There are no social implications from this plan.
Economic
The cost of installing, upgrading or replacing failed on-site systems places a financial burden on the property owner.
Risk
Exposure to litigation may occur where it is proven that Council has failed to meet its statutory obligations. The implementation of this plan will assist in reducing any such exposure.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct and indirect impact on
current and future budgets
The impact of the plan on current and future
budgets is generally neutral. A minor reduction in income may occur where the
frequency of inspections undertaken by Council are reduced. This reduction in
income will be off set by a reduction in expenditure via payment to Council’s
contractor undertaking the inspections.
Source of fund and any variance to
working funds
Funding is derived from fees associated with the lodgement of applications and inspections undertaken by Council.
1View |
14228/2009 - Summary of Submissions - On-site
Sewage Management Plan 2009 |
|
2View |
15112/2009 - Draft On-Site Sewage Management Plan |
|
3View |
4495/2009 - Submission/comments for Draft On-Site
Sewage Management Plan-Coffey Geotechnics |
|
4View |
6328/2009 - Submission for draft on-site sewage
management plan - Truewater Solutions |
|
5View |
6356/2009 - Submission for draft on-site sewage
management plan-John Craven |
|
15301/2009 - submission - Rosewood Environmental
Services for Draft On-site Sewage Management Plan |
|
|
15297/2009 - submission-Jim Ebert (Mid Coast
Reedbed Wastewater Systems) re Draft On-site Sewage Management Plan |
|
SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS – DRAFT ON-SITE SEWAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Submission lodged by: TRUEWATER SOLUTIONS
Page |
Section |
Comment |
Response |
4 |
6
Goals |
Minor change to wording to
reflect that not only AWTS systems need maintenance. |
Accepted. 9th
dot point, amended by removing word “aerated”. (page 4) |
9 |
Table 9.1 Treatment |
Request to include “Biological Filter systems” in
Table 9.1 under Secondary & Tertiary (Disinfection) systems. |
Accepted. Biological Filter Systems added to Table
9.1 under Secondary Treatment Systems. (page 9) |
10 |
paragraphs 1-11 |
Inclusion of Biological Filter systems under section 9 |
Accepted. Biological Filter Systems referenced under
9.2 (6) Reedbed systems. (pages 10 & 11) |
12 |
Subsurface Irrigation |
Suggested rewording to include emitter lines and
design standards. |
Accepted. Suggested wording included in Disposal 9.3
- 4th dot point subsurface irrigation. (page 12) |
12 |
Note: Fencing of disposal areas |
Modification suggested to wording of note referring
to protection of disposal areas. |
Accepted. Change made to note on page 12 |
11 |
9.3 Disposal |
Suggested modification to wording of |
Accepted. Amendments included in section 9.3 – 3rd
dot point Mound Disposal. (page12) |
20 |
11.2 Buffer Distances |
Suggestion that buffer distances should be determined
relative to the type of land application system, not the type of treatment
system. Distances will vary with the type of disposal system |
Accepted. Comment, Buffer distances are set within
the “Environment & Health Protection Guidelines – On-site Sewage
Management for Single Households” (page 20) |
21 |
12 Risk Evaluation |
Concern that systems could be passed twice as a Class
3 system (5 year Approval) and then granting a Class 4 (10 year Approval)
would mean the disposal system would be then within the time span where high
failure rate occur (15 – 20 yrs) |
Accepted.
Class 4 Risk Evaluation (10 year approval) has been deleted. The Class 3
Approval has been extended from a 5 year to a 7 year period. 7 year Approval
allows monitoring of systems over period where failure rate generally
increases but still reduces burden on owner in relation to number/cost of
inspections. Class 3 Approval are for system that pose minimal environmental
risk (page 21). |
22 |
Special Notes Item 2 |
Expressing concern with the quality of maintenance
servicing of AWTS systems. Having a contract and submitting service reports
in some instances does not indicate the condition of the system due to
unscrupulous operators. |
Comment noted. These concerns are being looked into
on a regional basis with Councils between |
20 |
13.1 Types of Systems |
Inclusion of Biological Filter systems as a
recognised approved system. |
Accepted. Section 9.2, included Biological Filter
Systems in this section as an approved type of system. (page 10) |
21 |
13.1 Item 4 |
Request that the definition of the mound system be
expanded to describe when they can be used and in conjunction with what type
of primary systems. |
Accepted. Comments have been added into the document,
section 9.3 (page 12) |
Submission lodged by: ROSEWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES P/L
Page |
Section |
Comment |
Response |
10 |
9.2 |
Concerns about continuing
use of trenches & ETA beds due to high rate of failure. |
Accepted. Additional
paragraph included in section 9.3 Absorption Trenches & Beds. (page 12).
Rosewood supports use of trenches in suitable areas however the length is
determined via the calculation for ETA beds which results in an increase of
trench length compared to the standard calculation. |
11 |
9.3 |
· Raised need for reserve areas for subsurface
irrigation areas as they can be rejuvenated. · Concern about having to show drainage lines and
location of fitting when preparing reports. · Existing systems – concerns that not all plumbers
have appropriate knowledge & experience to carry out accurate site/soil
assessments & designs. |
Accepted. Note included in site plan section of 9.4.
(page 13) Accepted. Paragraph included in plan under “The
Application” to reflect the requirement for site details when lodging
application to Council for approval to install or modify. (page 13) Comment noted. Additional reference in section 9.4
referring to design consultant or suitably trained licensed plumber. Any
report submitted is still required to be assessed by Council. (page 14) |
19 |
11.1 (Table) |
Query as to why Table has been modified to not
include “Moderate limitations” suggestion that the table be changed to
include Environment Health Protection Guidelines. |
Accepted. Table 11.1 Site Limitations has been
modified to include column for Moderate Limitations (page19) |
20 |
11.2 |
· Industry describe AWTS as secondary not Tertiary
systems · Raising concerns about banning surface disposal of
effluent from as it is an approved method when associated with AWTS. · Concerns about buffer distances for subsurface
irrigation for tertiary & secondary systems. · Supporting merit based assessment for buffer
distances when as proposed in the plan. |
Not accepted. Environment Health Protection
Guidelines include AWTS as tertiary systems. Not Accepted. Accreditation by NSW Health provides
three options for effluent disposal from AWTS. Condition of Accreditation
requires Council approval for method of disposal and as such Council has
authority to not approve certain methods. Concern with surface spray
irrigation relates to health risk where AWTS is not maintained/serviced or
malfunction occurs resulting in untreated effluent being sprayed over property.
Accepted. Setback distances have been amended to
align with the Environment & Health Protection Guidelines (Page 20). |
Submission lodged by: COFFEY GEOTECHNICS PTY LTD
Page |
Section |
Comment |
Response |
1 |
Executive
Summary |
Clarify that the plan
relates to dwellings only with households of 10 or less equivalent persons. |
Accepted. Paragraph
included in Executive summary to reflect this. (page 1) |
4 |
6 |
Add dot point – To ensure appropriate land
investigation & design of on-site sewage treatment& disposal systems. |
Accepted. Dot point added under GOALS (page4) |
4 |
6 |
Change to 10th dot point to reflect
suitably qualified service contractors & consultants. |
Accepted. Amendments made to the dot point to reflect
suitably qualified service contractors & consultants. (page 4) |
5 |
7 |
Review Process – clarify proposal to phase out
surface irrigation systems on lawn area. |
Accepted.
Surface spray irrigation is prohibited for new systems. Council encourages
existing surface spray systems to be replaced with subsurface irrigation or
surface drippers under mulch cover (pages 5 & 11). |
7 |
8.4 |
Add dates of publications being referred to within
the plan. |
Accepted. Dates added under heading Australian
Standards & Guidelines. (page 7) |
9 |
9.1 Table |
Change heading to right hand column. |
Accepted. Heading changed to read “Typical Land
Application or reuse System” as suggested. (page 9) |
9 |
9.1 Table |
Amendments to Table to include different type of
devices & land disposal systems. |
Accepted. Changes made to include the various types of
devices & land disposal systems as suggested. (page 9) |
11 |
9.3 |
Dot point relating to mound disposal systems. Add
comment that there are, other type of systems available but not readily used
within the shire. |
Accepted. Comment added under Mound Disposal Systems
(Wisconsin Mound). (page 12) |
11 |
9.3 & 9.4 |
AS/NZ 1547;2000 Currently under review & new
version may incorporate changes for future designs. |
Accepted. Comment included in 9.4 Design relating to
review of AS/NZ 1547:2000 & Environment & Health Protection
Guidelines 1998. (page 12) |
12 |
9.4 |
Clarification that any new subdivision application
must be accompanied by a land capability assessment. |
New section added under 9.4 “New Subdivisions
(Unsewered)” (page 14). |
19 |
11.1 Table |
Clarification as to who is required to assess the
property in accordance with the Table. Is the consultant to recommend the
inspection frequency. |
Accepted. Council as the assessing/approving
authority will determine the inspection frequency (page 19). |
20 |
11.2 |
Suggested rewording to headings under Buffer
Distances. |
Accepted.
Buffer distance headings changed for consistency with Guidelines (page 20). |
21 |
12.1 |
Who undertakes the risk assessment? |
Accepted. Risk assessment is used by the
consent/approving authority to determine the recurring inspection frequency.
(page 20) |
20 |
13.1 |
Section 13.1 is out of place in the plan and should
be merged with section 9.1 |
Accepted.
Information moved to Section 9. |
Submission lodged by: MID COAST REEDBED WASTEWATER SYSTEMS
Page |
Section |
Comment |
Response |
|
2
& 3 |
2,
5 |
No primary septics &
trenches on new developments. They are the main trouble and the biggest risk
to the environment & management policy. |
Not accepted. The type of
systems approved for use within NSW are accredited by the NSW State Health
Department with Councils only approving the site installation of accredited
systems. Septic tanks with trench disposal systems are an accredited system
with NSW Health therefore legally available for use within the shire. |
|
5 |
7 |
Address secondary treatment systems more thoroughly
in the new draft. If nothing else it will encourage people to treat their
onsite systems more seriously. |
Comment noted. The intent of including different
types of devices and disposal systems within the plan is to make users aware
of the various types of systems. It is not Council’s role to promote any one
particular type of system through the plan and it is appropriate to restrict
the use of certain types of devices and disposal systems on particular sites
as part of the approval process. The desk top assessment of an application to
approve an onsite system will be as good as the details provided in the
application. In many instances staff are dealing with systems that have no
previous approvals in place or a site/soil assessment undertaken prior to the
system being installed. In a large number of cases non accredited systems
have been installed without the need or the property owner of the time
obtaining an approval or seeking any inspections during installation. |
|
19 & 20 |
11.1 & 11.2 |
Upgrade septics to secondary systems on all blocks
within buffers especially if they are blatantly failing. |
Comment noted. The inspection process carried out
before continuing approvals to operate any system is & can be manipulated
and staff & contractors have had to reinspect systems where due to the
notification system it is obvious works have been undertaken to try and
ensure the system will pass inspection. Again site/soil assessment reports
have not been a standard requirement for upgrades where there have been
existing trenches or a disposal system which has not failed over past 12 – 20
years. It is not practical to retrofit all systems with
secondary treatment systems and in unsewered urban areas where smaller
residential allotments have systems that are failing the future options are
limited and may require off site options which will involve Council. Problems
are appearing in Eungai Rail, Eungai Creek, Taylors Arm & Upper Taylors
Arm with systems failing and insufficient room on the smaller residential
properties to replace disposal systems of install additional components to
the existing systems. Additional requirements have been included in the plan
for flood prone lands. |
|
6 |
8 |
Insist on all real estate & solicitors to comply
with state regulations on septics that are involved in a sale. |
Comment noted. Council through the 149 Certificate
& outstanding Notices and Orders process indicates the current status of
any operating approvals on onsite sewage management systems when a property
is sold. Council also offers a pre purchase inspection service should a
property purchaser wish to have a system inspected prior to purchase to
ensure it is operating satisfactorily. An approval to operate a on-site
sewage management system is held by the owner, therefore there is a
requirement under the Local Government Act 1993 to have this approval changed
over within 90 days of the transfer being notified to Council. This
requirement is also drawn to any purchasers attention at the 149 Certificate
& Outstanding Notices/Orders stage of the transfer process. |
|
6 |
8.1 |
Upgrade to secondary systems on all blocks that are
negotiating sales. |
Not Accepted. Not a statutory requirement and
property owners have the right to use accredited systems. Council staff
through the assessment/approval process do provide advices where systems have
shown a history of ongoing failure to look at alternative disposal options.
In many cases site assessment reports presented by consultants provide the
client with options and this does tend to mean the cheapest option is
selected in many cases, not necessarily the best system. Staff are regularly
advising applicants and plumbers that a designs that has been submitted for
approval is not adequate and negotiate amendments to the designs for on-site
disposal areas. While the recommendation has merit it is not legally
enforceable. |
|
|
|
Look at ways to bring about staged upgrades to lesson
costs. |
Comment noted. An ongoing concern with getting
systems to a standard where an operating approval can be issued. In some
cases 12-18 months elapses between detecting failures and being able to have
the system upgraded due to financial restraints. These cases are assessed and
monitored on a risk assessment basis to ensure where there is a direct
environmental or health impact works are carried as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
Be more thorough on consultants & plumbers in
regards to calculations & designs of on-site systems. |
Comment noted. This aspect is ongoing and designs are
often challenged and varied to ensure compliance with either the guidelines
or the Australian Standard for disposal areas. One area that is a key area of
concern is the design criteria specified when seeking an approval to install
or modify any system. In many instances attempts are made to have a 3 or 4
bedroom dwelling effluent system designed for current occupant numbers and
not the maximum tenant capacity of the dwelling. Design capacity and daily
flow rates are now specified on any such approvals along with conditions to
install water saving fixtures and use water saving appliances. At the end of
the day on-site sewage management systems rely on good water management and
awareness of how to manage the type of system installed. |
|
|
|
Be more thorough with inspections on existing
systems. |
Comment noted. Council endeavours to be as thorough
as possible when undertaking inspections however some property owners will go
to great lengths to deceive Council. |
|
|
|
Look at what other Councils are doing in regards to
onsite management & implement policy that will bring about real change
not just add to the problem. A difference can be made in 5-10 years with
systematic approach to upgrades. |
Comment noted. Draft Management Plan applies more
stringent requirements for on-site disposal. If taken to the nth degree, the
Management Plan could require tertiary treatment for all systems however this
is not the intent of the legislation nor is it a practical option. The intent
is to design a system that is suitable for its location and proposed use. |
|
11 |
9.3 |
Make AWTS add subsurface irrigation where sprinklers
are used. |
Note Accepted. New AWTS systems are not permitted to
have surface sprinklers under the draft plan. Council does encourage owners
of existing surface disposal systems to modify to subsurface disposal however
Council cannot “require’ the change unless the existing system is failing. |
|
Submission
lodged by:
JOHN CRAVEN
Page |
Section |
Comment |
Response |
2 |
3 |
Comments on what
legislation and matters must be taken into consideration in determining
applications for approval. |
Comments
noted. Guidelines indicate limited opportunity for use of absorption
trenches, however under suitable conditions disposal by absorption is still
permitted. |
3 |
4 |
The fact that Local
Governments have not implemented policies that reflect the
Regulations & Guidelines is a ticking time bomb. |
Comment
noted. Council’s draft Management Plan reflects the requirements of the
Regulations and Guidelines. |
3 |
5 |
Trenches can not achieve the objective of protecting
surface & ground water. Reuse of grey water is not the best use of resources as it contains the lowest
level of nutrients & can have deleterious effects on soil through high pH
and salt content. |
Not Accepted. Trenches are an accepted form of
disposal. New design/assessment criteria may result in other forms of
disposal being more cost effective. Greywater reuse has been legislated and
supported by NSW Dept Health as a permitted activity. Council’s draft
Management Plan reflects this position. |
4 |
6 |
Soil landscapes maps of the shire need to be made
available in digital format to assist consultants & staff when assessing
applications. Most soils within the shire are not suitable for
trench disposal of effluent. AWTS create additional work load for Council
administration staff & they have high failure rate |
Accepted. Reference to soil mapping is now included
within the Management Plan. Council requires a site specific soil assessment
to be undertaken for new systems to ensure suitability of the site for the
proposed system (page 13). Monitoring of AWTS does create additional work load
for Council however this type of system is accredited by NSW Dept of Health. |
5 |
7 |
Concern that systems are being inspected and passed
when they are not operating effectively. Grey water is best treated by mixing with black
water. |
Comment noted. See earlier comments on same matter. Grey diversion/reuse is permitted under the
legislation and Council’s draft Management Plan reflects this. |
6 |
8 |
Change of ownership as a potential trigger for
upgrading wastewater systems. |
Not Accepted. If the existing system is operating
satisfactorily Council cannot legally enforce a property owner to upgrade the
system. As mentioned above Council does provide information on S.149
Certificates and Certificates for Outstanding Notices/Orders in relation to onsite sewage management
systems. |
7 |
8.4 |
Reference to specific clauses of the regulations,
enables system types to be rejected if they don’t address all aspects of the
Act & Regulation. |
Comment Noted. Council as the approval authority is required
to consider certain matters before issuing any Approval to Operate/Install.
These considerations are undertaken as part of Council’s assessment of all
onsite sewage management systems. Most systems have advantages/disadvantages
and so, to a certain extent, satisfy the required considerations to varying
degrees. |
9 |
9 |
Reedbeds need to be
included in section 9 & definition of reedbed systems is considered to be
inadequate. |
Accepted. Table 9.1 &
section 9.2 have been revised. (pages 9 & 10) |
9 |
9.1 |
Greywater has long term deleterious effects on soils
due to high pH & salts. |
Comment Noted. Greywater diversion/reuse is creating
debate within the industry however current Regulations permits the activity. |
10 |
9.2 |
Most soils within the shire are unsuitable for
disposal trenches & ETA Beds become large dams & do not distribute
& allow reuse of nutrients. Subsurface irrigation allows for more even
distribution of hydraulic & nutrient load. |
Comment Noted. Site/soil assessments will dictate the
suitability of a particular form of system. The design standards may result
in trenches and ETA beds becoming financially unviable. It is agreed that
subsurface irrigation allows a more even disposal of hydraulic and nutrient
loading. |
12 & 13 |
9.4 |
Design criteria for new and existing systems when
modifying them need to be the same. There is no difference to risk to the
environment. |
Comment Noted. The variation for upgrades to existing
systems is limited to where full compliance with the current requirements cannot be complied with. |
15 |
9.5 |
Concern about existing on-site systems belonging to
tourist facilities along |
Comment Noted. Council is aware of the properties and
is currently in contact with the property owners in relation to an upgrade of
the systems. |
16 |
10 |
Trenches will not achieve objective of the plan. Reedbeds energy efficient and simple to maintain. Grey water diversion devices need maintenance &
can pose a risk to health for occupants. |
Comment Noted. See earlier comments relating to use
of absorption trenches. Greywater diversion/reuse can pose health risk as
with any wastewater system. Owner/operators need to take appropriate
precautions. |
21 |
12.2 |
Concerns that some systems are being passed following
inspections & they are failing. Systems passed when disposal areas can
not be identified. |
Comment Noted. See earlier response regarding Council
inspections. |
20 |
13.1 |
Reedbeds need to be included in this section. |
Accepted. 13.1 has been combined with 9.1 & 9.2
and reference to reedbeds have been included. (pages 9 & 10) |
20 |
13.2 |
Definition of reedbeds needs to be included |
Accepted. This section has now become section 14 and
the reference to reedbeds has been included in the definitions. (page 23) |
|
|
Additional information & comments:- Suggested additional conditions to be placed on
operation approvals for on-site sewage management systems. Need for many systems within the shire to have
secondary & Tertiary treatment systems installed to permit reuse. Trenches that are failing can have extended life if
secondary treatment systems are installed. Concerns that systems can be over designed &
options for detecting change in occupant numbers. |
Comments Noted. The draft Management Plan requires
any system within an high risk area (e.g. within 100mm of a water course) to
be a secondary/tertiary system. Primary systems are only an option where
site/soil characteristics are suitable. It is acknowledged that secondary/tertiary systems
provide improved effluent that will increase the life of the disposal system.
Council requires the wastewater system to be designed
according to the potential occupancy of the dwelling not the current
occupancy. For example a 4 bedroom dwelling may be occupied by 2 people
however Council will require that the system be suitable to accommodate 6-7
persons. By designing for potential occupancy, the risk of the system failing
is lessoned where overloading by extended stay of visitors or a increase in
occupancy rate occurs. |
Page 7
Ordinary Council
Meeting - 2 July 2009 Report on Review of Nambucca Shire Council - On-site
Sewage Management Plan |
Attachment
2 15112/2009 - Draft On-Site
Sewage Management Plan |
Nambucca
Shire Council
D R A F T
|
ON-SITE SEWAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN
2009
Prepared by:
Environment and
Planning Department
Date: June
2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2 LOCAL CONTEXT
3 SCOPE
4 AIMS
5 OBJECTIVES
6 GOALS
7 REVIEW PROCESS
8 ADMINISTRATION
8.1 APPROVAL
8.2 NON COMPLIANCE
8.3 LEGISLATION SCHEDULE
8.4 AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS AND
GUIDELINES
8.5 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
9 SEWAGE TREATMENT AND
DISPOSAL
9.1 TREATMENT
Table 9.1: Treatment Levels for Land Application
Systems
9.2 TYPES OF TREATMENT
SYSTEMS
9.3 DISPOSAL
9.4 DESIGN
9.5 FLOOD PRONE LANDS
10 MANAGEMENT RESPONSE
10.1 RESPONSE
10.2 ACTION PLAN
10.3 FUNDING
11 RISK ASSESSMENT
11.1 SITE LIMITATIONS
Table 11.1:
Site Limitations
11.2 BUFFER DISTANCES
12 RISK EVALUATION
12.1 EVALUATION
Table 12.1:
Risk Evaluation Classifications
12.2 INSPECTIONS
Table 12.2:
Risk Assessment Matrix
13 PLAN REVIEW AND
EVALUATION
14 DEFINITIONS
Ordinary Council
Meeting - 2 July 2009 Report on Review of Nambucca
Shire Council - On-site Sewage Management Plan |
Attachment
2 15112/2009
- Draft On-Site Sewage Management Plan |
1 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
This On-Site
Sewage Management Plan (strategy) was prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the Local Government (General) Regulation, 2005.
The plan relates to domestic wastewater
(non commercial/industrial activities) for on-site systems treating up to 2000
litres per day.
The Local Government Act 1993 requires all
on-site sewage management systems to be licensed by Council.
On-site sewage management systems (which
include septics, aerated wastewater treatment systems, composting toilets,
reedbeds, sand filters, biological filters, membrane reactors, greywater
systems, etc) are required in all non-sewered areas.
These systems treat wastewater from a
premise before being disposed of to an on-site land application area. Land
application areas may include absorption/evaporation beds, subsurface
irrigation or drip irrigation.
The Plan provides information to applicants
and the community about On-Site Sewage Management Systems and what must be
included in an application to install, modify or operate such a system.
On-site systems that are not performing
satisfactorily may lead to significant environmental and public health issues.
As such the long term viability and satisfactory performance of the system is
fundamental in minimising any potential adverse impacts.
2 LOCAL
CONTEXT
Nambucca Shire
Council is a medium sized coastal/rural Shire located on the Mid North Coast of
New South Wales. It comprises a mix of towns, villages, rural residential and
rural areas.
The Shire is
bounded generally to the north by Bellingen Shire and on the south and west by
Kempsey Shire. It is roughly triangular in shape, being 1,433km2 in
area with a coastline of approximately 20km. The Shire geographically
represents the catchment units for the
The Shire can be
divided topographically into two (2) broad areas. The western part comprises
the rugged topography of the eastern edges of the New England Plateau,
dominated by steep hill slopes and valleys with a significant area having
slopes in excess of 33%. The eastern part of the Shire is characterized by the
gentle slopes of the
From the
elevation of 0.0 metres at the mouth of the
Much of the Shire
comprises steep land (60%), with the remaining areas undulating (20%) or flat
(20%). The most productive rural land is on the alluvial flats of the
As at 19 November
2008 there were 2897 On-Site Sewage Management Systems registered with the
Nambucca Shire Council.
3 SCOPE
The Local
Government (General) Regulation, 2005, the State Government document entitled Environment & Health Protection
Guidelines – On-site Sewage Management for Single Households (which is
currently under review) and the Australian/New
Regulations
gazetted on 6 March 1998 require owners of relevant premises to apply to
Council for approval to operate and amend a system of sewage management. The
Council is required to grant an operating approval (eg, a sewer management
license). The granting of any such approval allows the Council to monitor
performance on a regular basis and to levy an inspection fee (frequency will
depend on area sensitivity) to cover reasonable costs.
4 AIMS
This management
plan is intended to:
¨ Provide a
framework to manage and regulate the impact of On-Site Sewage Management
Systems in the Nambucca Shire Local Government area and to ensure community
accountability.
¨ Assist Nambucca
Shire Council in prioritising resources for efficient regulation and monitoring
of On-Site Sewage Management Systems within the shire area.
¨ Co-ordinate environmental assessment, data collection and monitoring
which is related to On-Site Sewage Management.
¨ Allow for site assessment on risk management basis and consideration of
alternate solutions on environmentally sensitive sites.
¨ Provide opportunity for education of system users through ongoing
auditing programs.
5 OBJECTIVES
This plan has
been designed to achieve the following objectives:
¨ The protection of
surface water and ground water.
¨ The protection of
land and vegetation.
¨ Minimise the
health risk associated with On-Site Sewage Management facilities.
¨ Encourage the re-use of
resources eg the reuse of grey water after treatment through a
¨ Promote
ecologically sustainable development.
6 GOALS
¨ To continue
building and maintaining a database of all On-Site Sewage Management Systems.
¨ To map and
maintain details of soil and site conditions and suitability for On-Site Sewage
Management Systems. The mapping overlay being placed on Council’s GIS and use
of this information in conjunction with site specific soil reports should
provide beneficial data for all new systems being installed.
¨ To ensure that
all land application areas comply with environmental and health protection
standards and Council operating requirements.
¨ To adopt a
partnership approach with householders and service agents to support continual
improvement of On-Site Sewage Management systems.
¨ To determine the
structures and facilities needed to support On-Site Sewage Management Systems.
¨ To ensure that
all On-Site Sewage Management Systems are inspected by qualified people at
regular intervals and are maintained as required.
¨ In co-operation
with householders, to develop a site specific Sewage Management Plan for each
household using an On-Site Sewage Management System.
¨ To review
Council’s development standards and approval criteria for subdivision,
development and building works to ensure that appropriate provision is made for
sustainable On-Site Sewage Management when residential development occurs in
non-sewered areas.
¨ To consult all
wastewater treatment system agents to ensure that maintenance reports certify
that the system’s operation and land application of effluent is being done in
compliance with the site requirements and constraints.
¨ To promote the
use of suitably qualified service contractors and consultants that are
acceptable to
¨ To ensure
appropriate land investigation and design of on-site sewage treatment and
disposal systems.
7 REVIEW
PROCESS
A review process
must be undertaken on a regular basis for the following reasons:
¨ To ensure that
the resources, structures and facilities are in place to support On-Site Sewage
Management Systems.
¨ To ensure that
references to guidelines, standards and legislative requirements are up to
date.
¨ Compare and
review the management plan against the previous years of implementation to
asses’ community concerns and any improvement that can be made to the plan.
¨ Refine and
enhance Council’s regulatory role in the management of On-Site Sewage
Management Systems.
¨ Provide improved
assessment standards and techniques.
This current
review has the benefit of eight (8) years, of implementation and the following
issues are being addressed as part of the review process:
¨ Upgrading of
existing systems that are not performing satisfactorily.
¨ The phasing out
of “long drop” toilets (pit toilets).
¨ Upgrade of
greywater systems on larger rural properties.
¨ Upgrade access to
tanks to ensure good maintenance and operation of the entire on-site system.
¨ Undertake ongoing
education of operators and owners of on-site sewage management systems.
¨ Identify
properties that have unregistered systems.
¨ Follow up on
systems installed with unauthorised land uses.
¨ Encourage
replacement of existing surface disposal systems from AWTS with subsurface
irrigation or dripper systems with suitable covering.
8 ADMINISTRATION
8.1 APPROVAL
Under Section 68
of the Local Government Act 1993, Council approval is required for the
installation, construction or alteration of a human waste treatment device or
storage facility and drains connected to it.
Council approval
is also required for the ongoing operation of an On-Site Sewage Management
System. Failure to obtain an approval or to comply with the conditions of an
approval are offences liable to a maximum penalty of twenty penalty units
(currently $2200).
An Approval to
Operate must be held by the property owner for any on-site sewage management
system. Where a change in ownership occurs, the new owner is required to obtain
an Approval to Operate from Council within three months of the change.
Clause 26 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 sets out the
details that are to accompany an application for the installation of a sewerage
management facility with Clause 29 specifying the matters Council must take
into consideration when assessing an application to install or alter an on-site
sewage management system.
Council has
responsibility under the provisions of the Local Government Act to maintain a
register of On-Site Sewage Management Systems within their local government
area.
Local Government
therefore has responsibility to ensure that each approved system is maintained
and serviced correctly. Furthermore, Local Government has a legislative
responsibility to ensure that approved systems are installed and operated
according to approved specifications and any special conditions.
NOTE: A helpful fact sheet and checklist
containing specific details that must accompany an application is available
from the
8.2 NON COMPLIANCE
The failure to
operate or maintain a system in accordance with a Council approval or the
requirements of NSW Health may lead to operating licenses being
suspended/withdrawn, Orders issued or penalty notices being served.
8.3 LEGISLATION SCHEDULE
The following
Acts and Regulations contain provisions that are applicable to on-site sewage
management systems:
¨ Local Government
Act 1993
¨ Local Government
(General) Regulation 2005
¨ Protection of the
Environment Operations Act 1997
The commencement
date of the On-Site Sewage Management Legislation was the
6 March 1998 (date of the gazettal). The legislation provides that:
¨ Land owners with
On-Site Sewage Management facilities installed prior to the
6 April 1998 must apply to the Council to register their system and
for approval to operate a System of Sewage Management.
¨ New performance
standards for approvals to install, construct or alter an On-Site Sewage
Management facility apply from the 6 March 1998.
¨ Land owners who
install new On-Site systems after the 6 April 1998, must obtain
Council approval to operate a system of sewage management prior to the intended
date of occupation of the premises.
¨ Council’s were
required to adopt an approved fee for applications for approval to operate any
new system installed from 6 April 1998 by resolution and public notice
under Section 612 of the Local Government Act 1993. This fee is included in
Council’s Annual Management Plan.
8.4 AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
The relevant
Standards and Guidelines are as follows:
¨ AS/NZS
1546.1:1998 - On-site Domestic Wastewater Treatment Units – Septic Tanks
¨ AS/NZS
1546.2:2001 – Waterless Composting Toilets
¨ AS/NZS
1546.3:2001 - Aerated Wastewater Treatment Systems
¨ AS/NZS 1547:2000
– On-site Domestic Wastewater Management
¨ AS/NZS 3500:2003
– Plumbing and Drainage
¨ NSW Department of
Health - Certificates of Accreditation for Septic Tanks and Collection Wells
¨ NSW Department of
Health – Greywater Reuse in Sewered Single Domestic Premises, 2008
¨ Environmental
Health Protection Guidelines – On-site Sewage Management for Single Households,
1998
¨ Nambucca Shire
Council On-site Sewage Management Plan, 2009
8.5 PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS
Council must not
approve an application which would not comply with performance standards
prescribed by the Regulation and must take into consideration, relevant
guidelines and directions that have been issued by the Director General of
Local Government.
In 1998 the Local Government Act 1993 was
amended to include new regulations for On-site Sewage Management (OSSM)
Systems.
The current
regulations specify that On-Site Sewage Management Systems should be designed,
installed and operated to ensure the following environmental and health
performance objectives will continue to be met over the long term:
¨ Prevention of
health risk.
¨ Protection of
land.
¨ Protection of
surface waters.
¨ Protection of
ground waters.
¨ Conservation and
re-use of resources.
¨ Protection of
community amenity.
Clause 44 of the
Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, requires that a system of sewage
management must be operated in a manner that achieves the following specific
performance standards:
¨ the prevention of
the spread of disease by micro-organisms,
¨ the prevention of
the spread of foul odours,
¨ the prevention of
the contamination of water,
¨ the prevention of
degradation of soil and vegetation,
¨ the
discouragement of insects and vermin,
¨ ensuring that
persons do not come into contact with untreated sewage or effluent (whether
treated or not) in their ordinary activities on the premises concerned,
¨ the minimisation
of any adverse impacts on the amenity of the premises and surrounding lands,
¨ If appropriate,
provision for the re-use of resources (including nutrients, organic matter and water).
9 SEWAGE
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL
9.1 TREATMENT
Wastewater
requires varying levels of treatment, depending on the method of disposal and
the sensitivity of the site. Treatment is generally classified as primary,
secondary or tertiary.
Primary treatment
is the separation of suspended material from wastewater by settlement and/or
flotation in septic tanks, primary settling chambers, etc prior to discharge to
either a secondary treatment process or to a land application system.
Secondary
treatment is generally an aerobic biological process involving the settling or
filtering of effluent from a primary treatment system and provides an improved
“quality” effluent.
Tertiary
treatment is the disinfection of effluent to destroy or remove pathogenic micro-organisms.
The following
table indicates the level of wastewater treatment required for the relevant
land application system:
Table 9.1:
Treatment Levels for Land Application Systems
TREATMENT |
DEVICE TYPE |
TYPICAL LAND APPLICATION OR REUSE SYSTEM |
Primary |
· Septic Tank · Greywater Tank · Waterless Composting Toilet · Wet Composting Toilet · Combustion Toilet |
· Soil Absorption system · Burial (compost) · Soil Mound · Evapotranspiration system |
Secondary (without disinfection) |
· AWTS · Greywater Treatment · Primary Device and Sand Filter · Primary Device and Reed Bed · Biological Filter System · Membrane Reactor |
· Subsurface irrigation · Soil Mound · Evapotranspiration |
Tertiary (with disinfection) |
· AWTS · Greywater Treatment · Primary Device and Sand Filter · Biological Filter System · Membrane Reactor |
· Subsurface irrigation · Soil Mound · Evapotranspiration |
Greywater Tertiary |
· Greywater Treatment Device |
· Subsurface irrigation · Toilet · Washing Machine Use |
Source: Environment and Health Protection Guidelines (Modified)
9.2 TYPES OF TREATMENT SYSTEMS
1 Aerated Wastewater Treatment Systems
(AWTS)
Aerated
wastewater treatment systems provide tertiary treatment of effluent and are
accredited by NSW Department of Health. They are essentially a compact
treatment plant that processes all domestic wastewater from premises. They
contain a primary settling chamber, an aeration chamber, a clarification
chamber for the further settling of suspended solids and a chlorination chamber
for disinfection. It is a requirement of NSW Health that the systems are
inspected and serviced on a quarterly basis.
2 Biological Filter
A biological
filter system generally treats all wastes by filtration through various layers
of media. The media is inoculated with worms, beetles, mites and other soil
fauna that assist with the degradation of the waste material. For tertiary
treatment the effluent is disinfected (generally by UV light) prior to
discharge to the disposal field.
3 Composting Toilets (Wet & Dry)
Composting toilets use a process of
biological degradation by micro-organisms to convert waste material into humus.
The compost from compost/humus toilets must be removed on a regular basis and
can be disposed of on-site by burial. The design and configuration of the
systems vary significantly.
4 Grey & Black Water
These systems provide primary treatment and
comprise of two tanks - one receiving wastewater from
the toilet, and the other receiving wastewater from the combined laundry,
shower & possibly kitchen (depending on proposed method of disposal/reuse).
Some systems included a 'grease-trap' in the plumbing between the kitchen and
the septic tank, to limit the amount of fats and oils going to the tank.
5 Greywater
Diversion/Treatment System
Greywater is wastewater from all fixtures excluding the kitchen, toilet
or urinal. Greywater “diversion devices” may be used for subsurface disposal
within the property in conjunction with an approved on-site sewage management
system. The diversion of greywater should not occur during periods of wet
weather or when illness within the premises exists. Where reuse within the home
for washing machine or the flushing of toilets is proposed a greywater
“treatment system” accredited by NSW Health is required to be installed. NSW
Health has various publications available that outline the requirements for
diversion and/or reuse.
6 Membrane Filtration
With membrane
filtration, the membrane acts as a semi-permeable filter that allows wastewater
to pass through whilst trapping bacteria, suspended particles and dissolved
solids. There are four main types of membrane filtration-reverse osmosis,
nanofiltration, ultrafiltration and microfiltration. The type of filtration
system used will depend on a number of factors including surface area,
contaminants, pH and end use.
7 Pumpout
Due to unsuitable
site conditions for wastewater disposal, Council only allows, under extreme
circumstances, the installation of pump out systems. This involves the use of a
collection well which stores treated wastewater from the septic tank. The
stored wastewater is then pumped out into approved tankers which transport the
wastewater to Council sewage treatment works where treatment and disposal
occurs
8 Reedbed Systems
Reedbed systems consist
of a primary settling unit, secondary treatment module (sub-surface flow
wetlands) and final treatment via subsurface irrigation. They treat wastewater
through settling of solids within the primary chamber. Biological and physical
filtering/treatment of the wastewater is then undertaken in the secondary
module via gravel media and selected plants which reduces the levels of
pathogens, Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and suspended solids. As the
wastewater flows through the media, the root system reduces the nutrient load
and uptakes moisture via transpiration. Final distribution is to an irrigation
area.
9 Sand Filters
With sand/membrane
filtration, effluent that has undergone a primary treatment is collected in a
sump or holding well and is pumped intermittently for distribution through a
bed of coarse sand. A diversion valve is placed in the return line to the sump,
and the effluent is directed to a land application system.
10 Secondary/Tertiary Treatment Systems
After the
wastewater has undergone primary treatment the effluent may be further refined
to secondary or tertiary quality. By this further process pollutant levels
within the wastewater can generally be reduced to a level that is readily
manageable. However, effluent from some treatment systems may still be
biologically active and contain high levels of pollutants. There have been many
developments in the area of ancillary on-site sewage management systems. These
systems can be added to the main treatment train with the objective of improving
the effluent quality, and so enabling the treated wastewater to be managed in a
larger number of ways. These ancillary systems are not considered to be
treatment systems requiring certification by NSW Health. At this stage they are
considered optional, but they are worthy of consideration.
11 Septic Tank
Historically,
septic tanks have been the most common method of on-site wastewater treatment
in un-sewered areas of the Shire. A septic tank provides primary treatment of
effluent and usually comprises two chambers. These chambers can be separate or
within the one tank. The first or primary chamber allows some of the solids to
settle to the bottom of the tank and oils and fats to rise to the surface to
form a scum layer. The solids that settle to the bottom of the primary chamber
undergo anaerobic decomposition forming sludge. The second chamber permits
further settling of solids and creation of a scum layer before the effluent is
discharged to a land application area (usually absorption trenches or evapotranspiration
areas).
Alternative
systems to those listed above will be considered by Council where such system
is accredited by NSW Dept Health.
9.3 DISPOSAL
Effluent that has
been treated may be discharged to a land application area. Application areas
vary in their design and method of disposal to suit a range of factors
including, type of treatment system, climatic conditions, site constraints,
etc.
Note: Conventional treatment methods
of wastewater cannot remove all bacteria or viral organisms. Exposure or
contact may result in adverse health effects and as such the surface disposal
of effluent via spray irrigation or other method is not permitted within
Nambucca Shire.
Common disposal
systems within the Nambucca Shire are:
· Absorption
Trenches and Beds
Absorption
trenches and beds are designed to dispose of treated effluent by percolation
into local soils. As absorption is the primary method of disposal this style is
ideally suited to soils with a mid range percolation rate. Soils that are too
dense will not permit the migration of the effluent leading to flooding of the
trench. Conversely soils that drain too freely (sand, gravel, etc.) may not
provide adequate filtration of the effluent and risk contamination of groundwater
supplies. Absorption trenches and beds are historically the most widely used
on-site disposal systems throughout the Shire. However, under current design
guidelines their future use will become less common due to unsuitable soil
profiles and a significant increase in the required sizing of the trench/bed to
satisfactorily accommodate the wastewater loading. The increase in the required
area is likely to result in other forms of treatment/disposal becoming more
financially viable.
· Evapotranspiration
Area
Evaporation/transpiration
areas place effluent into the root zone of plants allowing transpiration and
evaporation while sub-soil soakage is maintained. They generally have a large
surface to depth ratio in order to maximise effluent infiltration of the
vegetation root zone. Climatic conditions are a critical consideration in the
design of these systems as wet weather may have a significant adverse affect on
the efficiency of the evapotranspiration area. The sizing of the area needs to
address the infiltration of rain water and due to high seasonal rainfall of the
Nambucca Shire many consultants do not promote the use of these systems.
· Mound Disposal System (Wisconsin Mound)
Although not common within Nambucca Shire a mound system can be
considered where alternative methods are not suitable. An elevated mound is
typically a large mound of varying height made of sand or other course media. A
network of small diameter pipes with small perforations distributes the
effluent uniformly over the absorption area of the mound. The effluent
infiltrates into and percolates through the media before being absorbed into
the natural earth. The mound system is commonly used to receive wastewater from
a septic tank or secondary treatment system with its primary function as the
land application component where other types of land application are not
suitable.
· Subsurface
Irrigation
Subsurface
irrigation is generally employed with a pressurised system utilised in
conjunction with an AWTS or other secondary treatment system. The effluent is
typically disposed of via emitters in direct soil contact at depths of
150mm-350mm depending on the system design or in shallow trenches over a large
area which can incorporate gardens or the like. The pressurised system permits
even distribution of the hydraulic and nutrient load over the disposal area.
The area can be located at a higher elevation than the treatment chamber and
therefore provides more opportunities to maximise reuse.
Where any
disposal area may be subject to vehicular traffic or stock access, fencing or
other suitable barriers are to be constructed to protect the disposal area.
9.4 DESIGN
Historically, the
design and selection of on-site sewage management systems only received cursory
consideration which was reflective of the technical standards and requirements
of the time. With the release of Australian Standard 1547-1994 (subsequently
superseded in 2000) and the State Governments Environment and Health Protection
Guidelines for On-Site Sewage Management (1998) the standards of design altered
to reflect the need for specific site, soil and climatic assessment.
It is also relevant to mention that prior
to the Approvals provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 the NSW Health
Department had responsibility for the approval of all sewage management
installations in un-sewered areas.
The primary reference documents for the
design and installation of on-site sewage management systems within Nambucca
Shire are:
1 Local Government (General) Regulation,
2005
2 AS/NZS 1547-2000 – On-site Domestic
Wastewater Management,
3 Environment and Health Protection
Guidelines – On-site Sewage Management for Single Households, and
4 Nambucca Shire Council On-site Sewage
Management Plan.
Special note should be made that only under
extreme circumstances will an on-site sewage management system be permitted
within 100 metres of a permanent waterway or environmentally sensitive area.
With such a proposal, the system must include a secondary or tertiary treatment
component and be sited to maximise any available buffer.
To assist in the preliminary investigation
of suitable on-site sewage management systems, Council has information
available for perusal relating to soil profiles and characteristics within the
Shire. Soil Landscapes of the Macksville
& Nambucca (2000) prepared by the Department of Land and Water
Conservation contains useful information to assist in the preliminary
assessment. The document is not to
be used as a substitute for site specific soil analysis as variations from the
mapping may occur resulting in an inadequate system being proposed.
New
Systems
The installation and operation of any new
on-site sewage management system requires the prior approval of Council.
An Application to Install an On-site Sewage
Management System shall include a written report detailing the type of system
proposed and a specific site and soil assessment for the subject property.
Council will assess the application for
compliance with the reference documents as listed above.
The application to install an on-site
sewage management system shall include:
1 On-site
Sewage Management Report
· The report is to be prepared by a suitably
qualified and experienced consultant,
· The report shall provide a detailed site
and soil assessment which addresses climate, topography, geology and vegetation
aspects,
· A recommendation for the most appropriate
form of on-site sewage management system,
· A recommendation for the proposed
configuration and location of the system along with supporting calculations.
2 Site
Plan
· Drawn to a scale of 1:200 or larger,
· Showing the location of the on-site system
and disposal area with distances from all buildings, property boundaries, and
any drainage lines, culverts or watercourses within 100m.
· Showing a “reserve” disposal area
equivalent in size for duplication of the disposal area (Note: the reserve area
generally applies to septic tank/absorption trench systems and may be of a
lesser size or removed completely where improved treatment/land application systems
can justify the reduction/removal),
· Indicating the position of all wastewater
drainage lines,
· Indicating the distance to any
environmentally sensitive area eg rivers, creeks, farm dams, bores, dry
gullies, etc.
3 Manufacturers
Specifications and Accreditation Certificates
· Full specifications of the proposed on-site
sewage management system,
· Certificate of Accreditation from the NSW
Department of Health.
Existing
Systems
Existing systems that are failing and
require modifications are to be upgraded to comply with the requirements for
new systems where possible. A system is considered to have “failed” when it
does not satisfactorily address the performance standards identified within
this plan.
Where compliance with the new requirements
is not possible, Council will consider alternative proposals on a case by case
basis. The protection of the environment and public health are dominant
considerations in such a circumstance.
A preliminary assessment of the site
constraints and soil condition are to be accompanied by the modified design
along with supporting calculations. The preliminary assessment may be
undertaken by persons with appropriate knowledge and experience (eg a design
consultant or suitably trained licensed plumber).
New
Subdivisions (Unsewered)
For new subdivision proposals, a land
capability assessment is required to be undertaken to demonstrate that each
proposed lot is capable of accepting the on-site disposal of wastewater. The
assessment does not need to specify the design details of each particular
system as the final design will be influenced by criteria set down by the
future home builder and such information is generally not available at
subdivision stage.
The information submitted (as a minimum)
should include:
1 Land
Capability Assessment
· The report is to be prepared by a suitably
qualified and experienced consultant,
· The report shall provide a detailed site
and soil assessment which addresses climate, topography, geology and vegetation
aspects of each lot,
· Recommendations for appropriate systems for
different landforms across the subdivision.
2 Site
Plan
· Drawn to a scale of 1:200 or other suitable
size,
· Showing the location of the effluent
disposal envelopes in relation to the building envelopes,
· Showing a “reserve” disposal area
equivalent in size for duplication of the disposal area (Note: the reserve area
generally applies to septic tank/absorption trench systems and may be of a
lesser size or removed completely where improved treatment/land application
systems can justify the reduction/removal),
· Indicating the distance to any
environmentally sensitive area eg rivers, creeks, farm dams, bores, dry
gullies, etc.
9.5 FLOOD PRONE LANDS
New
Installations:
The design and installation of new on-site
sewage management systems should ensure all components of the system are
located above the 1:100 year flood level. Where this cannot be achieved the
treatment system components are to be located above the 1:100 year flood
level/or sealed to prevent access of flood waters with the disposal area to be
assessed in accordance in the type of system proposed.
Electrical components, vents and inspection
openings of wastewater treatment devices should be sited above the 1:100 year
flood level.
Amendments/modifications
to existing systems:
Where existing systems are installed below
the 1 in 100 year flood level for a site, options to ensure the following
security of the system are to be implemented:
¨ Tanks and
collection wells are to be sealed to prevent flood water infiltrating the
system,
¨ Overflow Relief
Gullies if installed are to be terminated above the 1 in 100 year floor level,
provided this level is not above the fixture flood level or floor waste level
in the building connected to the system. See AS 3500 for details.
¨ Where flood free land is available on the site,
consideration be given to pumping liquid effluent to a disposal area above the
1 in 100 years flood level.
For land where no established flood levels
are held by Council, documented evidence is to be submitted demonstrating the
site is unaffected by flooding (eg historical information, photographs, etc).
10 MANAGEMENT
RESPONSE
10.1 RESPONSE
Applications for
installation of an on-site sewage management system were not required in rural
areas prior to the building regulations being extended to these areas from the
1 March 1982. This has resulted in a variety of standards and type of systems
for on-site sewage management being installed within the rural areas of the
shire during these unregulated years.
It is therefore
considered important that any management response to the issue of On-Site
Sewage Management systems and the disposal of waste should seek to achieve a
balance between:
a Improving
Council’s approach to achieving sustainable long term outcomes and;
b Encouraging
facility owners to upgrade these older systems to ensure that their systems are
operating and being maintained appropriately and also acknowledging the
limitation that apply to these older systems.
The situation
that exists in un-sewered areas is such that sustainable long term outcomes
should be achievable in most cases using On-Site Sewage Management Systems. In
order to achieve more sustainable and long term outcomes for on-site wastewater
management it is necessary to identify the fundamental principles which apply
to wastewater management. For the purposes of this plan the following
principles have been adopted:
1 Conservation and Re-Use of Resources
The resources in
domestic wastewater (including nutrients, organic matter and water) should be
identified and utilised as much as possible within the bounds posed by the
other performance objectives and regulatory requirements. Water conservation
practices should be encouraged and subsequent wastewater production minimised.
2 Appropriate Treatment And Disposal
The level of
wastewater treatment and the methods of disposal required depend not only on
the nature and sensitivity of the receiving environment, but also on the
potential uses of the treated wastewater and bio-solids.
3 Reliability
All on-site
sewage management systems require, to varying degrees, maintenance and
servicing to be undertaken. It is inappropriate to install a sewage management
system and to expect it to perform adequately without maintenance and
performance inspections being carried out. Education of the system user is
considered fundamental to the satisfactory performance of an on-site sewage
management system.
4 Long Term Impacts
The above principles have been used to
identify a range of goals and actions which are considered integral to
achieving more sustainable sewage management outcomes in un-sewered areas.
These goals and actions have been developed into an action plan.
5 Public Health And Health Impacts On
Occupants
Poor maintenance
of components of an on-site system can severely impact on health of the
surrounding public and that of the tenant or occupier of the premises connected
to the system. Both blackwater (toilet waste) and greywater (all other sources)
contain high bacterial loads and can be breeding grounds for insects and a
vector for disease.
10.2 ACTION PLAN
The objectives
and goals have been developed to reflect, in responding to the issue of sewage
management in un-sewered areas, a multifaceted approach which requires:
¨ Education/information.
¨ Service
provision.
¨ Efficient and
effective administration.
¨ Facility
provision.
¨ Appropriate
regulation and enforcement.
It is suggested
that if the on-site sewage management issue is viewed in this context then
regulatory and enforcement mechanisms will be minimised and generally accepted.
The regulatory
process has been developed to ensure compliance with both stages of the
approval process being Installation and Operation of the system. Aspects of
Council’s Action Plan have been included in Council’s Annual Management Plan
for quarterly reporting.
10.3 FUNDING
Council is able
to raise revenue for On-Site Sewage Management programs and services through:
¨ Ordinary rates
for general administration and services.
¨ Special rates
levied on particular parcels of land that have access to, benefit from or
contribute to the need for particular programs and services.
¨ Charges for
On-Site Sewage Management services.
¨ Approved fees for
service (including regulatory services to individuals).
¨ Develop a charge under
Section 94 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.
In developing a
revenue strategy it is considered important to develop an approach which is:
¨ Administratively
efficient.
¨ Cost efficient.
¨ Fair, equitable
and minimises financial impact.
¨ Guarantees
implementation.
Having regard to
the above it is proposed that actions which involve environmental assessment,
monitoring and reporting and community education be funded through charges
levied on premises using sewage management facilities.
Provision has
been made within Council’s Management Plan for the development and ongoing
monitoring of the On-site Sewage Management Plan. The legislation requires
individual site management plans to be developed.
Accordingly
provision has been made within the management plan for annual fees and charges
to be adopted for the following activities:
¨ Approvals to
install and operate an On-Site Sewage Management System fee (one-off payment).
¨ Approval to amend
an existing on-site sewage management system.
¨ Renewal fees for
issuing an operating approval for existing systems.
¨ Pre purchase
inspection of on-site sewage management system.
¨ Registration fee
for existing systems installed prior to 1999.
¨ Issue a copy of
an operating approval.
¨ Application to
change ownership details on operating approval.
Note: Council is the only
authority who can issue approvals to operate an on-site sewage management
system under Section 68 (6) of the Local Government Act 1993.