NAMBUCCA SHIRE COUNCIL
ORDINARY
COUNCIL MEETING - 16 JULY 2009
1 APOLOGIES
2 PRAYER
3 DISCLOSURE
OF INTEREST
4 CONFIRMATION
OF MINUTES — Ordinary Council Meeting - 2 July 2009
5.1 Notice
of Motion - Dingos in Nambucca Shire
5.2 Notice
of Motion - Removal of Podium in Council Chambers
5.3 Notice
of Motion - Reinstatement of Questions without Notice in the Business Paper
5.4 Notice
of Motion - Community Services - Deleted from Council's Portfolio
5.5 Notice
of Motion - Request for Leave - 28 July 2009 to 7 August 2009 - Cr Smyth
6 DELEGATIONS
(if any)—Motion to hear Delegations
7 ASKING
OF QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE
8 QUESTIONS
FOR CLOSED MEETING WHERE DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED
9.1 Outstanding Actions and Reports
9.2 Council's capacity to ensure the preservation of Council's
electronic information
9.3 Local Government Remuneration Tribunal - Determination of
Councillor Remuneration Effective from 1 July 2009
9.4 Request by Nambucca River Jockey Club to purchase
9.5 Special Rate Variation and Making of Rates - 2009/2010
10 Director Environment and Planning Report
10.1 Contract Regulatory Officer's Report - June 2009
10.2 Outstanding DA's >12 months, applications where submissions
received & not determined 4 July 2009
10.3 DEP Applications and Statistical Reports July 2008-June 2009,
2002-2009 and Certificates Received 2004-2009
10.4 Report on Joint Bushfire Management Committee Meeting held 10 June
2009
10.5 Report on Department Of Local Government Circular 08-61 - Plumbing
Inspections By Council
10.6 Report on Successful Funding Application - Local Adaptation
Pathways Program
10.7 Report on Minutes of Access Committee Meeting 23 June 2009
11 Director Engineering Services Report
11.1 Tree Planting Plan 2009/2010
12 General Purpose Committee 15 July 2009 - REPORT
13 General Manager's Summary of Items to be
Discussed in Closed Meeting
12.1
It is recommended that the Council resolve into closed session with the
press and public excluded to allow consideration of this item, as provided for
under Section 10A(2) (d) of the Local Government Act, 1993, on the grounds that
the report contains commercial information of a confidential nature that would,
if disclosed (i) prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied
it; or (ii) confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council; or
(iii) reveal a trade secret.
12.2 Plant Operations Reports - Paveliner and Major Plant
It is recommended that the Council resolve into closed session with the
press and public excluded to allow consideration of this item, as provided for
under Section 10A(2) (g) of the Local Government Act, 1993, on the grounds that
the report contains advice concerning litigation, or advice that would
otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of
legal professional privilege.
a Questions raised by
Councillors at 8 above
i MOTION TO CLOSE THE MEETING
ii PUBLIC VERBAL REPRESENTATIONS
REGARDING PROPOSAL
TO CLOSE
iii CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC
REPRESENTATIONS
iv DEAL WITH MOTION TO CLOSE THE MEETING
14 MEETING CLOSED TO THE
PUBLIC
15 REVERT TO OPEN MEETING FOR DECISIONS IN RELATION TO
ITEMS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED MEETING.
.
16
July 2009 |
Notice of Motion
ITEM 5.1 SF225 160709 Notice of Motion - Dingos in Nambucca Shire
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: John Ainsworth, Councillor
Summary: There have been
recent numerous recent sightings of what appear to be full bred dingos—up to
seven in a pack—on the beaches and properties in the Scotts Head and Way-Way
area coupled with an increasing number of dog-related livestock deaths. Given that there
have been no sightings of pure-bred dingos in this area for over thirty
years, the sudden sightings of such a large number of these dogs has raised
the issue of where did they come from almost instantaneously. Many residents
consider that these dingos may have been relocated by the National Parks and
Wildlife Service. |
That Council write to National Parks and Wildlife Service to enquire
as to whether or not the Services has relocated Dingos to the |
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
Notice of Motion
ITEM 5.2 SF283 160709 Removal of Podium in Council Chambers
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: John Ainsworth, Councillor
Summary: On reflection I
believe that Council should reconsider the removal of the podium from the
Council Chambers. A rebated ramp to
the podium is the better option. |
That a rebated access ramp be provided to the podium in the Council
Chambers in lieu of its removal. |
DISCUSSION:
I know that Council
endorsed the removal of the podium in adopting the minutes of the Access
Committee meeting at Council’s meeting on 16 April 2009. However on reflection I believe that this is
a retrograde step for a number of reasons.
I understand it’s
possible to provide a rebated ramp on the eastern side of the Council Chambers
which will provide disabled access to the podium area. This would respond to the concerns of the
Access Committee. I also understand this
will likely be cheaper than removing the podium with the possibility that
electrical cabling will need to be relocated.
I also think that the
retention of the podium is important for the chairing of meetings, and
particularly the Council meeting. The
Mayor has to have a good view of the Council Chambers and gallery which is
provided by the podium.
CONSULTATION:
The General Manager has
advised me that a rebated access ramp to the podium can be provided on the
eastern side of the Council Chambers.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
No implications.
Social
The ramp will provided disabled access.
Economic
No implications.
Risk
Council will meet its legal requirements.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
A provision of $1,500 has already been made
in the budget.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
No implications.
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
Notice of Motion
ITEM 5.3 SF1269 160709 Reinstatement of Questions without Notice in the Business Paper
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Moran OAM, Councillor
Summary: The notice of
motion seeks the reinstatement of questions without notice in the business
paper agenda. |
That questions without notice always be included in the Council
meeting business paper agenda. |
DISCUSSION:
I’ve noticed that the
opportunity for questions without notice seems to have slipped off the agenda.
A lot of people ask me
questions and they expect me to put their questions before Council. I should be able to ask those questions in
questions without notice. Otherwise
there is no democracy.
MANEX COMMENT
Council receives on average 60 (mainly
telephone) operational requests per week which have to be actioned by Council
staff. It is recommended that
Councillors who wish to raise operational matters do so via the Customer
Request System which already handles these operational requests. They can be made over the phone or email
during business hours rather than being “stored up” for a Council meeting
Matters which are not operational can be
dealt with via a Notice of Motion.
In this way, Questions Without Notice is
superfluous and their deletion from the Agenda satisfies the concerns raised in
the Promoting Better Practice Review.
A further issue with Questions Without
Notice is the tendency for statements to be put, which again should be dealt
with via a Notice of Motion.
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
Notice of Motion
ITEM 5.4 SF1269 160709 Notice of Motion - Community Services - Deleted from Council's
Portfolio
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Moran OAM, Councillor
Summary: Nambucca Shire
Council delete Community Services from Council’s portfolio to finance
infrastructure of roads and bridges |
1 That Council delete
Community Services from Council’s portfolio. 2 That the savings from the deletion of
Community Services be used to finance infrastructure of roads and bridges. |
MANEX COMMENT
This is obviously a major organisational
change and involves Council’s vision, function, organisation structure, financial
agreements with third parties and contractual arrangements. There will also be industrial implications
with the need to make at least 8 full time positions redundant.
These should not be addressed as a Notice of
Motion in the manner requested. The
preferable approach would be to consider proposals of this magnitude in the
preparation of the Draft Management Plan.
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
Notice of Motion
ITEM 5.5 SF1269 160709 Notice of Motion - Request for Leave - 28 July 2009 to 7 August 2009
- Cr Anne Smyth
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Anne Smyth, Councillor
Summary: Cr Smyth has
requested leave from 28
July 2009 to 7 August 2009 inclusive. |
That
Cr Anne Smyth be granted leave of absence in accordance with Section 234(d)
of the Local Government Act for the period 28 July 2009 to 7 August 2009
inclusive. |
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.1 SF959 160709 Outstanding Actions and Reports
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter, General Manager
Summary: The following table is a report
on all outstanding resolutions and questions from Councillors (except
development consents, development control plans & local environmental
plans). Matters which are simply noted or received, together with resolutions
adopting rates, fees and charges are not listed as outstanding actions. Where
matters have been actioned they are indicated with |
That the list of outstanding
actions and reports be noted and received for information by Council. |
No |
FILE
NO |
COUNCIL MEETING |
SUMMARY OF MATTER |
ACTION BY |
STATUS |
||||||
|
JULY 2008 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1 |
Item
9.9 |
03/07/08 |
Council make representation to
Minister for Lands seeking agreed compensation for subdivision of Reserve
91694 |
GM |
Letter sent 15/07/08. Follow up letter sent 14/11/2008. Minister for Lands has advised by letter
dated 8/1/09 that land will be made available to Council as per the agreement
following finalisation of an Aboriginal Land Claim. Follow up letter sent 9 April. |
|||||
2 |
Item
11.4 |
03/07/08 |
That a new plan of management
be prepared for Farringdon Playing Fields |
DES |
Funding declined. Work on preparing plan to be scheduled. Interested parties will need to identify
potential uses for inclusion in revised plan of management. Local cricket and soccer associations to
be contacted regarding use of the fields. No response as at 22 June 2009. |
|||||
OCTOBER 2008 |
|
|||||||||
3 |
RF256 |
16/10/08 |
Notice of
Motion - Riverbank Erosion - |
DES |
Subject to GHD undertaking evaluation. Separate assessments underway for: Awaiting
further survey. GHD site mapping
complete. Catchment Assessment: Report being prepared by GHD. |
|
||||
NOVEMBER
2008 |
|||||
4 |
SF544 |
6/11/08 |
Council review biennial the
Community Infrastructure and Infrastructure Needs Study and review annually
the Section 94 Community Facilities and Open Space Contributions Plan Works
Schedule. |
GM |
Report November 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER 2008 |
|
|||||
6 |
SF688 |
4/12/08 |
That
during the first half of the 2009/10 year Council call for community input
into a new Environmental Levy program for the 5 year period to the end of
2014/2015. |
DEP |
Programmed for
September 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
SF1046 |
18/12/08 |
That
the Wellington Drive component of the Urban Design Strategy be deferred
pending a further report to Council in relation to further studies re land
slip, rising sea level and traffic/parking. |
DEP |
Report March
2009. Deferred in
Draft Budget. 16 April 2009
meeting. Deferred until
draft Nambucca River Master Plan prepared. |
|
JANUARY 2009 |
||||||
9 |
PRF53 |
15/01/09 |
Preparation
of landscape design for |
DES |
Quotations
being sought. Late March. Deferred to May
2009. Deferred to
June 2009. Deferred to
July 2009. Brief posted –
deadline 31 July 2009. |
|
10 |
PRF53 |
15/01/09 |
DES
to enquire with Department of Public Works about opportunities to remove or
refurbish the river gauging station in |
DES |
Letter sent to
the Manly Hydraulics Laboratory. The Dept of
Commerce have advised that Council in 1981 raised no objection to the
Department of Public Works proposal to install an automatic recorder after
consideration of the approximate location and type of structure, The site is
important because of the consistency with historical data. An alternative
building or structure must still use the same site. Letter sent re
standard of building required. |
|
FEBRUARY 2009 |
|||||
11 |
SF241 |
5/02/09 |
That a new plan of management
for the reserve within Kingsworth Estate be prepared by DES. To include pedestrian and vehicular access
arrangements and management of environmental values. |
DES |
October 2009 |
12 |
SF869 |
19/02/09 |
Council write to Country
Energy concerning energy being wasted with street lighting at the Pearl
Estate off the |
DES |
DES to meet Country Energy to discuss
further. Meeting 15 June 2009—Cancelled Now 13 July 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARCH 2009 |
|||||
14 |
SF1297 |
5/03/09 |
That
Council make representations to the DECC and RFS re requirements for bushfire
asset protection zones around houses. |
DEP |
Letters to be
prepared and sent. Letters sent 16
March 2009. Response from
DECC received No response
from RFS as at 23 June 2009. Further letter
sent to RFS 3 July 2009. |
DA09/049 |
5/03/09 |
The RTA be requested to revise
the speed limit along the |
DES |
Letter sent. No response as at 24 March 2009. RTA advised 6 April 2009 that they will
review and advise Council of outcome. Follow up letter sent to RTA. Verbal advise that on-site assessment
done. No written notification 6 July
2009. |
|
16 |
DA09/061 |
5/03/09 |
That Council review the
Carparking Section 94 plan for Nambucca Heads.. |
GM |
Target report to Council in July
2009. Report to consider priorities
for contribution plan reviews. Awaiting on Section 94 Coordinator,
deferred to August 2009. |
17 |
SF791 |
19/03/09 |
That
a report go back to the Land Development Committee on the outcome of
advertising for expressions of interest for the purchase and development of
industrial land in Nambucca Heads. |
GM |
Report to come
back following advertising. DES to
investigate potential for closure of part of the road to add to the
industrial land. Surveyor to
identify services and boundaries. |
APRIL 2009 |
|||||
18 |
SF939 |
2/04/09 |
Views
of Chambers of Commerce, Nambucca Valley Tourism and High Schools be sought
as to proposed marketing slogan and billboards and alternative suggestions |
GM |
To be reported back in August 2009 |
19 |
SF871 |
16/04/09 |
That the future of the Pioneer
Community Centre be subject to a further report to Council in 3 months time
following receipt of any proposal from the CoM to retain the building. Also Council seek the flat be
vacated and obtain insurance details. |
GM |
Report in August
2009. Letter sent 20/4/09 to CoM
requesting that the flat be vacated and requesting insurance details. Committee of
Management wish to be provided with reasons as to why the flat should be
vacated (verbal advice to GM on 22/5/09). Committee of
Management advised that vacancy of flat recommended by the report on the
building’s fire safety (by letter on 23/6/09). Further letter
issued instructing that the flat be vacated (7 July 2009). |
20 |
SF959 |
16/04/09 |
Sub-Committee continue a
review of Draft Management Plan so that it can be presented to Council in
March 2010. |
GM |
A report is to be
prepared to the Sub-Committee on a staged process for reviewing the Draft
Management Plan. Report to be
completed by June 2009. Subcommittee
to report by March 2010. Review will now
have to be in accordance with new legislation. GM to prepare report for
August 2009. |
21 |
SF1305 |
16/04/09 |
Council make representations
to the Minister for Emergency Services and Minister for Roads to seek funding
for the repair of landslips in Nambucca Heads which occurred as a consequence
of the flood events in February and March 2009. Also that Council make representations to
the Insurance Council for the provision of insurance for land slip damage. |
GM |
Letters sent 21
April 2009. Follow-up letter
sent 28 May 2009. DES to write to
RTA requesting a program as to when they will make determinations and when
emergency funds will be available. |
23 |
SF444 |
16/04/09 |
That the revised road
hierarchy plan, incorporating a grading program be deferred to the next GPC
meeting with Councillors to provide any comments to Acting DES within 7 days. |
DES |
Report to GPC 17
June 2009. Deferred to GPC
August 2009. |
MAY 2009 |
|||||
24 |
SF851 |
7/05/09 |
That Council receive a report
on progress and a timeline for completion of Stage 1 of the Climate
Protection Program and that the report also identify the staffing resources
and funds needed to complete the project. |
DES |
To be considered
with report on administrative staff due July 2009. Deferred to
August 2009 so that Consultative Committee is advised. |
25 |
SF959 |
07/05/09
& 4/6/09 |
That the report concerning
Wia-Ora sand and gravel quarry consider options for calling in bonds to
undertake works. |
DEP |
Council again
write to Dept Water & Energy Letter sent 10
June 2009. No response as at
6 July 2009. |
26 |
SF639 |
07/05/09 |
That the staffing of the
Department of Environment and Planning be reviewed in 6 months or upon
resignation of any professional staff member, whichever occurs first. |
GM |
Report to
Consultative Committee 8 July 2009 and Council 16 July 2009. Consultative Committee meeting deferred to
21 July. Report in August 2009. |
27 |
SF639 |
07/05/09 |
Council receive a report
relating to the need for administrative support across the organisation. |
GM |
Report to
Consultative Committee 8 July 2009 and Council 16 July 2009. Consultative Committee deferred to 21 July
2009. Report in August 2009. |
28 |
SF21 |
07/05/09 |
Council investigate the
implementation and costs of an effluent management system at the saleyards |
GM |
August 2009 |
29 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Allocation for retaining wall
at Little Beach be deferred for consideration at the September Quarterly
Review |
DES |
November 2009 Follow-up letter
sent. |
30 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Council consider a report on
the operation of the saleyards as a business unit and what, if any, subsidy
is to be applied to its operations. |
GM |
November 2009 |
31 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Council review the cycleway
plan so as to ensure its funding requirements are realistic. |
DES |
December 2009 |
32 |
SF1213 |
07/05/09 |
Council receive a report on
the funding and use of the reserves for the Council Chambers Upkeep, Self
Insurance and Tourist Centre Upkeep. |
GM |
September 2009 |
34 |
SF1269 |
21/05/09 |
Council write to Parliamentary
Secretary for Roads seeking assurance that the |
DES |
Letter sent 18
June 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
SF1231 |
21/05/09 |
Use of Road Reserves and
public land for commercial, community and charitable activities – that there
be a further report to consider items 1-6 in the letter from the Chamber of
Commerce. |
DEP |
Report in August
2009. Meeting scheduled
for 5.00 pm 16 June 2009 with Chambers of Commerce. Formal responses
requested from participants by end July 2009 for presentation to Access
Committee before finalising policy. Final report to
Council in September 2009. |
37 |
SF452 |
21/05/09 |
Council seek from the Minister
for the Environment acceptance that the sampling data for the old landfill
indicate down stream impacts are minimal and re-installation of the leachate
interception trench is not justifiable. |
DES |
Local DECC office
advised by letter of Council’s intention. Formal proposal
for Minister being prepared. |
38 |
SF452 |
21/05/09 |
Council consider the provision
of additional monitoring bores at the landfill with a report on the cost for
installation and monitoring. |
DES |
Report to July
2009. proceeding to
provide 3 addition monitoring bores at the Cost of $3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JUNE 2009 |
|||||
40 |
SF1269 |
4/6/2009 |
Report on options for
pedestrian safety for |
DES |
Report September
GPC. Preliminary
concepts commenced. |
41 |
SF639 |
4/6/2009 |
Review of Tourism Function |
GM |
Deferred to 16
September GPC |
46 |
SF1131 |
18/6/2009 |
That the RTA be requested to
contribute 50% of the funding to undertake repair of the landslip below Jason
Cottages and the matter be reviewed at the budget review for the June 2009
quarter. |
DES |
To be considered
at September 2009 GPC. Letter sent to
RTA. |
47 |
SF750 |
18/6/2009 |
That the report on S138
applications, bonds and footpath specifications be deferred so as to enable
more information to be provided on the standard of concrete |
DEP DES |
Report to be
resubmitted to July GPC meeting. Deferred to
August GPC |
48 |
RF256 |
18/6/2009 |
That the RTA be requested to
contribute 50% of the funding for the works required to stabilise |
DES |
Letter sent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JULY 2009 |
|||||
50 |
SF769 |
2/7/2009 |
Council make representations
in conjunction with Bellingen Shire Council to the RTA and Minister for
Roads, the Hon. Michael Daley MP objecting to the change in classification of
the Bowraville to |
GM |
Letters drafted
6/7/09 |
51 |
SF736 |
2/7/2009 |
A review of the strategic
direction for the Aboriginal Youth Worker project be undertaken early 2010 or
possibly before if there are changes to funding programs by the State
Government. |
DEP |
January 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.2 SF1272 160709 Council's capacity to ensure the preservation of Council's
electronic information
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Chris Mattick, Manager Information Technology
Summary: Councils digital records are one of this organisations greatest assets and the NSW Government encourages Council to manage the information efficiently in order to safeguard this asset and derive the most benefit from it, now and into the future. The ideal solution for digital preservation would be to preserve electronic records of permanent value without their being dependent upon a specific computer for processing or on specific computer programs for access. Unfortunately this solution will never be an option due to evolutionary processes. Digital preservation comes at a cost and the success of this preservation is dependent on Councils commitment to, and allocation of adequate resource to ensure this. |
1 That Council engage a consultant to identify and recommend improvements to our existing records management practices. (estimated 2 week consultancy - $15,000) 2 That Council provide an additional resource for ongoing management of electronic records. ($50,000 pa) 3 That Council acquire suitable remote
office space to house disaster recovery equipment. |
OPTIONS:
Refer to option provided by GM in the consultation section.
There is the option of doing nothing and accepting greater levels of risk.
The other option is deferring the recommendation
for consideration in the budget for 2010/2011.
DISCUSSION:
Increasingly, Council records are being received, created and stored in electronic format.
It is a requirement under s.14 of the State Records Act that Public offices have an obligation to maintain accessibility to equipment/technology dependent records, more importantly those records that are required to be kept for long term retention or as state archives.
Recently, State Records launched a website, namely “Future Proof – Protecting our digital future” as “a place for people to learn more about the NSW Government digital recordkeeping strategy and to share information about their own activities, projects and experiences in regards to digital recordkeeping. It is also a place to ask questions and offer advice to others who may be going through similar experiences”.
This website will no doubt be an important on going resource to assist Council with our data preservation however at this point in time it provides little supplementary information to what is already identified in this report.
State Records have also produced a comprehensive 100 page guideline titled “Managing Digital Records” February 2009 to assist organisations with the management of their digital records.
I will briefly list some of the most relevant points this guideline recommends to re-enforce how Council should be managing electronic records.
I will then provide details of Councils current position with some suggestions on how we can improve the future proofing and retention of our electronic information.
State Records Guidelines
Council should ensure that the infrastructure, systems, policies and procedures are in place to support capture and maintain digital records.
Council should ensure that policies and document standards are adhered to.
Open formats for documents and data storage should be adopted. These formats are less at risk of becoming inaccessible because of change to vendor arrangements and are easier to migrate.
File formats should be limited to help simplify the ongoing management of digital records.
Digital records should be regularly destroyed in accordance with State Records Act (General Disposal Authority). Retention of superfluous records is expensive and can inhibit the ability to locate and retrieve information quickly.
Council should be aware of current and proposed future changes to systems and technologies and ensure that Computer software applications and hardware systems are adequately maintained.
Validation of digital resource at creation time is paramount. The cost to “clean-up” at a later stage when most of the context may have been lost is conservatively estimated to be ten times greater.
Employees should have appropriate expertise and training in the digital systems that are implemented.
Effective data backup and disaster recovery methodologies must be practiced.
Digital records must be kept secure and stored in an appropriate fireproof and climatic environment.
Migrations from one hardware or software configuration to another or from one generation of technology to another must be managed effectively.
Problematic records such as email should be managed effectively.
Effective policy and guidelines should be adopted for the management and disposal of digital images.
Our current position
Internal policy and guidelines are adopted to ensure that all data is stored in appropriate systems and storage areas.
In the main these policies and guidelines are adhered to but there would be many records that are not managed in accordance with the previously mentioned best practices. To identify these records thoroughly would require significant additional resources.
Generally our software applications are current and are compliant with State Records standards on digital record keeping.
The current systems and storage areas are backed up to magnetic tape or other magnetic media every night. These tapes are rotated and eventually become monthly backups and are saved indefinitely in a fireproof and secure location. Relatively current copies of monthly backups are also stored remotely some kilometres away.
In addition to the magnetic tape backups all current data forming part of the Fujitsu 2000+ suite of software, which encompasses Councils financial and property related systems, is copied daily to a disaster recovery server (computer) at a local external site.
It would be very advantageous for Council to copy all data and systems to external servers to provide for seamless disaster recovery however these facilities are not currently available.
These backup procedures are not bullet proof and do not necessarily future proof Councils electronic information however they do provide a reasonable guarantee that relatively current information is secure.
The future – Digital Preservation
Planning for digital preservation must recognise that the process is ongoing and that investments in improving capture rates, accuracy, resolution, and verification will have long term benefits.
Current commercial products generally provide utilities for data migration and conversion and provide for backwards compatibility. These features in their own right should guarantee the preservation of Council’s data.
CONSULTATION:
There has been consultation with Councils Records Officer.
The General Manager agrees with the
sentiments expressed but believes that Council does not have the finances
available to implement the recommendations.
His view is that the first priority should be the provision of a data
link and adequate server capacity to allow all back up to a server rather than
tape. Currently only the financial data
is backed up to a server with all other data such as letters; reports; and
spreadsheets being backed up on tape.
This would provide for superior business continuity in the event of a
disaster. Provision for this could be
considered in a quarterly review.
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
Nil
Social
Nil
Economic
Nil
Risk
Loss of information.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
There is no provision in the budget to
finance the recommendations.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
If the recommendations are adopted they
would need to be funded from working funds.
There are no
attachments for this report.
16 July 2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.3 SF270 160709 Local
Government Remuneration Tribunal - Determination of Councillor Remuneration
Effective from 1 July 2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Michael Coulter,
General Manager
Summary: The Local Government Remuneration Tribunal
has issued a determination to increase the fees for Councillors and Mayors by
2.5 percent. It is recommended that
Council adjust its Councillor Annual Fee and the additional Mayoral Allowance
in accordance with the determination backdated to 1 July 2009. |
1 That
Council adjust its Councillor Annual Fee and the additional 2 That
the change in fees be backdated to 1 July 2009 in accordance with the
determination by the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal. |
OPTIONS:
There are 3
options. Council can adopt a fee for
Councillors and the Mayor at the minimum or maximum levels. The minimum annual fee for a Councillor is
$7,040 and the minimum additional fee for the Mayor is $7,480. Council can also choose not to adopt any fee
in which case the fee which is applied is the minimum.
DISCUSSION:
Pursuant to Section 241
of the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal
determines in each category of Council, the maximum and minimum amount of fees
to be paid to Mayors and Councillors of Councils, as well as chairpersons and
members of County Councils. The Tribunal
has now completed a fundamental review of the categorisation of Councils. Whilst there has been a change in the
description of categories there has been no substantive change in
categorisation or remuneration.
The Tribunal noted that
the number of people seeking election to local government continues to
increase. During 2008, 4,410 persons
nominated for election to local government.
This was an increase of 28% over the 3,428 persons who nominated for
election in 2004.
The Tribunal also noted
the impact of State Government planning reforms. “These
reforms will result in a range of Council development and planning
responsibilities being transferred to either the Planning Assessment Commission
or to Joint Regional Planning Panels.
While these changes are still be to be fully realised, the Tribunal will
monitor over the coming year the likely impact of planning reforms on
Councillor roles and responsibilities”.
The Tribunal also mentioned the global economic downturn as posing significant
challenges to local government. Having
regard to these and other factors the Tribunal fixed an increase of 2.5 per
cent in the fees for Councillors and Mayors as appropriate for the forthcoming
year.
The full report on the
2008 Annual Review can be read on the following website www.remtribunals.nsw.gov.au/local_government/2009_report_and_determinations
The determination means
the fees for Councillors can increase from $9,060 in 2008/2009 to $9,290 in
2009/2010 with the additional allowance payable to the Mayor increasing from
$19,790 in 2008/2009 to $20,280 in 2009/2010.
Nambucca Shire Council
along with 76 other Councils is classed as a Rural Council. The applicable fees for councillors,
effective 1 July 2009 for a Rural Council are shown in the following
table. By way of comparison with Mid
North Coast Councils,
|
Councillor/Member
Annual Fee |
Mayor/Chairperson
Additional Fee* |
||
|
Minimum |
Maximum |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Rural |
7,040 |
9,290 |
7,480 |
20,280 |
Regional Rural |
7,040 |
15,500 |
14,980 |
33,840 |
Metropolitan |
7,040 |
15,500 |
14,980 |
33,840 |
Metropolitan Centre |
10,560 |
19,730 |
22,460 |
52,410 |
Metropolitan Major |
14,080 |
23,250 |
29,940 |
67,750 |
|
14,080 |
23,250 |
29,940 |
67,750 |
|
21,140 |
31,000 |
126,310 |
170,150 |
* This fee must be paid
in addition to the fee paid to the Mayor/Chairperson as a Councillor/Member
(S.249(2)).
The LGSA indicate that a
reasonable expectation of work load for new councillors would be 21 hours per
week and as the experience of the Councillor increased that this may reduce
slightly. Assuming some leave, to provide
for say 1,000 hours of time in a year means an hourly rate for a Councillor of
$9 per hour. And that doesn’t include
consideration of election expenses and other out of pocket expenses such as
telephone calls. Accordingly it is
recommended that Councillor Fees and the Mayor’s Fee be increased to the
maximum allowable for a Rural Council.
CONSULTATION:
There has been
consultation with the Manager Financial Services
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There is no impact on the environment.
Social
The NSW approach to local government is
increasingly out of step with our neighbouring States. It is possible that the current level of fees
discourages younger people and/or people of more diverse backgrounds from
seeking election to local government.
Economic
There are no economic implications.
Risk
There are no risk implications.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct
and indirect impact on current and future budgets
The budget for 2009/2010 provided for a 3.2%
increase compared to the determination of 2.5%.
The recommendation will result in a minor improvement in working funds.
Source
of fund and any variance to working funds
There will be a minor positive improvement
in working funds.
There are no attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.4 SF600 160709 Request by
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Steven Williams, Property Officer
Summary: Council is the registered proprietor of Lot 3 and 4 in DP 593774 being the land upon which the Nambucca River Jockey Club has its clubhouse and racing facilities (Lot 3) and land forming the starting run to the racecourse proper (Lot 4). The land is classified as community land. Council is also the Trust Manager for Reserve D540002 being the racecourse proper. The Reserve is gazetted as a Public Recreation Reserve. Both Lots 3 & 4 In DP 593774 and the Crown Reserve are leased to the Nambucca River Jockey Club until September 2013. The leases are interdependent. The rental on each lease is set at the minimum statutory rent of $396.00 per annum. The Nambucca River Jockey Club has requested Council consider selling the Council owned land to the Club and transferring the Crown Reserve Management to the Club. The Club advises that Racing NSW (the controlling body of Thoroughbred Racing in NSW) is in the process of establishing a Minimum Venue Standard for every racing and training venue in NSW. The Club has advised that they are committed to achieving minimum standards to ensure the ongoing operation of the racecourse. The Club’s commitment to the ongoing operation of the racecourse however presents a less than ideal situation for the Club insofar as the Club’s capital expenditure on assets will be committed to land they do not own or control. It should be noted that currently the majority of improvements to the racecourse facilities have been financed and completed by the Jockey Club. The Club does not propose to change the current operation of the facility or reserve other than to effect improvements that may be required to meet the Minimum venue Requirements required by Racing NSW so as to best ensure continued operation. Numerous issues will need to be addressed should Council consider selling the land to the Club including reclassification of the land from Community to Operational and drafting of terms to protect Council’s interest in the event the Club seeks to sell or transfer the land in the future. |
1 That Council agree in principle to a
proposed sale of Lots 3 in Deposited Plan 596774 and Lot 4 in Deposited Plan
596774 to the Nambucca River Jockey Club subject to negotiation of terms
satisfactory to Council. These terms
are to include the right of first refusal or a buy back option for the price
for which the land is sold in the event the 2 That Council write to the 3 That Council
receive a report from the Property Officer detailing the suggested terms of
the proposed sale of Lots 3 in Deposited Plan 596774 and Lot 4 in Deposited
Plan 596774 to the Nambucca River Jockey Club for their further consideration
of the matter. 4 That Council obtain a valuation for
the sale of Lots 3 in Deposited Plan 596774 and Lot 4 in Deposited Plan
596774, the cost of the valuation to be met by the |
OPTIONS:
1 Council
can retain the status quo that being leasing the Council owned land to the
Jockey Club on terms interdependent with the Lease of the Crown Reserve, of
which Council remains as Reserve Trust Manager.
DISCUSSION:
Council Owned Land
Council is the
registered proprietor of
Lot 3 DP 593774 is the land upon which the Racecourse facilities are located.
Lot 4 DP 593774 is a strip of land which forms the starting race to the racecourse proper.
Both parcels are currently leased to the Nambucca Valley Jockey Club on minimal rental of $396.00 per year until September 2013. The Lease is interdependent with a Lease to the Jockey Club of Lot 75 DP 755549 being the Crown Reserve forming the racecourse proper. See site map - annexure 1.
The Lease provides the Jockey Club with exclusive use of the land and to this end the Jockey Club attends to, and finances all maintenance and improvements on the land. It should be noted that the majority of improvement on the land (kiosk, clubhouse, change rooms etc) have been erected by and at the expense of the Jockey Club. The Jockey Club insures the improvements. The effect is that the operation of the Bowraville racing precinct is at nominal to no expense to Council.
Council cannot sell or transfer community land. Should Council consider a possible sale, the land would need to be reclassified to Operational by way of a Local Environment Plan (cl 27 Local Government Act 1993). This process entails environmental studies, community consultation, public exhibition of the plan and Ministerial approval (Clauses 54,57,62,66 and 69 of Environment and Planning Assessment Act 1979 respectively).
Crown Reserve D540002
The balance of
the racecourse precinct comprises
Council as Trust Manager of the Reserve has licensed the use of the reserve to the Nambucca River Jockey Club for the period to September 2013. This Agreement is interdependent with the Lease of the Council owned land.
The Licence permits the use of the reserve for horse racing and training purposes 6am – 10am daily and for 6 meetings per year. Access to the Reserve is available to the public at all other times. The Jockey Club facilitates community use of the reserve for function such as garden expo’s, tree fairs, pony club and weekend markets.
The Club proposes that they be appointed as the Reserve Trust Manager in lieu Council. There are clear administrative benefits in Council withdrawing as Reserve Trust Manager.
Club activities on the Land
The Nambucca River Jockey Club is a voluntary organisation reformed in the 1970’s and committed to Thoroughbred Racing in the Nambucca. They conduct 6 TAB accredited races annually including the Bowra Cup.
The club reports that all racecourse and public facilities have been funded by the Club.
Outside of racing events and training the facility is unused. The Nambucca River Jockey Club secretary Mr Graham Brookes has identified this as an area that the Club seeks to expand its activities by accrediting itself as a conference venue, (Governors Licence).
The Club currently employs one person for 25 hours per week. It is planned to seek a Governors Licence in due course to extend trading options to include licensed functions on days other than race days. Further employment opportunities would arise should a Governors License be granted.
The club reports annual expenditure of $500,000 per year.
The president of the Bowraville Chamber of commerce Mr Mark Scott advised that in his opinion the jockey club activities create significant and invaluable economic activity for the township and attract a substantial number of new visitors each year. Mr Scott has offered to seek a formal statement from the Bowraville Chamber of commerce should the Council so desire
Proposal to sell Council land to the Jockey Club
The Club advises that Racing NSW (the controlling body for Thoroughbred Horse Racing in NSW) is in the process of establishing a Minimum Venue Standard for every racing and training venue in NSW. The final terms of the minimum venue standards have not yet been finalised. Notwithstanding this however the Club advises that they are committed to achieving the minimum standards to ensure the ongoing operation of the Bowraville racecourse. For example it is anticipated that the Minimum Venue Standard will require venues to have a 12 horse start capacity. The existing track has a ten horse start capacity and accordingly the club would be required to extend the racecourse to accommodate the new standards. It is anticipated that this work will cost in excess of five thousand dollars to complete.
The Club’s commitment to the ongoing operation of the racecourse however presents a less than ideal situation for the Club insofar as the Club’s capital expenditure on assets will be committed to land they do not own or control. The Club does not propose to change the current operation of the facility or reserve other than to effect improvements that may be required to meet the Minimum venture Requirements required by Racing NSW.
The Club Secretary advises that in the event the Club is unable to meet the anticipated minimum venue standards they will not be able to conduct race events.
Should Council consider selling the land to the Jockey Club it would need to first reclassify the land from Community to Operational.
This process can only be achieved through the gazettal a Local Environment Plan pursuant to cl 27 of the Local Government Act 1993 and the provision of the Environment and Planning & Assessment act 1979.
The process requires application to the Minister for Planning, environmental studies measuring the impact of the proposed reclassification, conduct of a public hearing and the exhibition of the Draft LEP and finally Ministerial consent.
Should Council elect to sell the land to the Jockey Club it is recommended that a contract for sale encompass provision whereby completion of the contract would be subject to and conditional upon the above-mentioned process. Further it is recommended that the Purchaser meet the costs of (or at least contribute to) the reclassification process and legal costs associated with the sale.
Council should also consider their control of the facility beyond the Transfer to the Jockey Club. To ensure ongoing control it is recommended that a Contract for sale include provision whereby Council has a right of first refusal or a buy back option for the price the land is sold in the event the Jockey Club seeks to sell or transfer the land in the future.
CONSULTATION:
Mr
Graham Brookes –
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
The recommendations do not give rise to any
environmental issues.
Social
The Jockey Club provides a significant and valuable
attraction to the Bowraville community in conducting their race events,
particularly the Bowra Cup. Accordingly
Council should consider how it may facilitate the continued operation of the
Club.
Economic
The rent income generated by way of the Lease
Agreement of the Council land and Reserve are nominal. Conversely costs
associated with maintenance and repairs are virtually nil on account of the
Jockey Club attending to the upkeep of the precinct. The club reports
generating significant economic activity
for the
Risk
The recommendations do not pose any significant risk
to Council.
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS:
Direct and indirect impact on current and future budgets
Only nominal rent is generated from the Licence Agreements. Administrative cost for the management of the Licence would exceed rentals income.
It is recommended that the purchaser meet any out of pocket expenses incurred by Council as a consequence of the sale (should it be decided to pursue this matter).
Source of fund and any variance to working funds
It is recommended that the purchaser meet any out of pocket expenses incurred by Council as a consequence of the sale (should it be decided to pursue this matter). Accordingly no variation to working funds is expected.
Allocation of sale proceeds has not been considered at this stage.
1View |
16537/2009 - Map for the Bowraville Racecourse
Precinct |
|
16 July 2009 |
General Manager's Report
ITEM 9.5 SF1213 160709 Special
Rate Variation and Making of Rates - 2009/2010
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Jenita Hunt, Rates
Officer
Summary: The Minister for Local Government has
determined Council’s application for Special Variation to General Income. In addition to the approved rate pegging of
3.5% the Minister has approved a special variation increase of 1.12%. Council is now required to make the rates
and charges in accordance with Section 535 of The Local Government Act 1993. |
1 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 501 of the Local Government Act 1993, the annual
standing charge for water supply services to all properties connected or able
to be connected to Council’s water supply in accordance with Section 552(1)
of the Local Government Act 1993 for 2009/2010 is made at sixty six dollars
($66.00) per assessment, for a 20mm or 25mm connection, two hundred and sixty
four dollars ($264.00) for a 40mm connection, four hundred and twelve dollars
and fifty cents ($412.50) per assessment for a 50mm connection, one thousand
and fifty six dollars ($1,056.00) for a 80mm connection and one thousand six
hundred and fifty dollars ($1,650.00) for a 100mm connection, with a consumption charge of one dollar and
thirty seven cents ($1.37) per kilolitre to apply to all water consumption
and such charges to have a short title of “Water Charge”. 2 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 501 of the Local Government Act 1993 the annual
access charge for sewerage services to all properties connected or able to be
connected to Council's sewer in accordance with Section 552(3) of the Local
Government Act 1993 for 2009/2010 is made at three hundred and eighty five
dollars ($385.00) per assessment for
single residential connections, two hundred and thirty six dollars
($236.00) per assessment for 20mm non
residential connection, six hundred and four dollars ($604.00) per assessment
for 40mm non residential connection, nine hundred and two dollars ($902.00)
per assessment for 50mm non residential connection, two thousand one hundred
and ninety eight dollars ($2,198.00) per assessment for 80mm non residential
connection, three thousand three hundred and eighty eight dollars ($3,388.00)
per assessment for 100mm non residential connection and two hundred and
twenty six dollars ($226.00) for vacant land/non connection with a sewer
usage charge of one dollar and eighty six cents ($1.86) per kilolitre to be
calculated on the estimated volume discharged
from all properties excluding single residential connections using the
total water consumption based on Land and Water Conservation's formula and
Department of Energy, Utilities and Sustainability's best practice pricing
guidelines and such charge to have a short title of "Sewerage
Charge". 3 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 501 of the Local Government Act 1993, the waste
management tip provision charge for 2009/2010 is made at ninety eight dollars
($98.00) per assessment for properties which do not receive a domestic waste
or other waste service; such charge to have the short title of “Waste
Management Tip Provision”. 4 That
in accordance with Section 496 of the Local Government Act 1993, the annual
charge for 2009/2010 for domestic waste service on all occupied rateable land
in the Shire, categorised Residential or Farmland under Section 515 or 516 of
the Local Government Act 1993 to which a domestic waste service is provided,
is made at four hundred and thirty eight dollars ($438.00) per separate
occupancy per land parcel/assessment, such charge to have a short title of
“Domestic Waste Management — Occupied”, the amount of the annual charge
will be the amount derived by applying the formula A = B x $438.00, where “A”
equals the annual charge, “B” equals the number of separate occupancies and $438.00
is the unit price. 5 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 496 of the Local Government Act 1993 the annual
charge for 2009/2010 for domestic waste on all vacant rateable land in the
Shire, categorised Residential (under Section 516 of the Local Government Act
1993) and located within the confines of the towns of Nambucca Heads, Valla
Beach, Hyland Park, Macksville, Bowraville and Scotts Head and the villages
of Taylors Arm Upper, Taylors Arm Lower, Eungai Rail, Eungai Creek, Warrell
Creek and Donnellyville and all land within the rural sector with a
residential building entitlement and within a subdivision both past and
present which results in the concentration of holdings to create an estate of
two or more lots, all ribbon development lots along rural roads contiguous to
developed estates, all ribbon development lots along rural roads immediately
opposite to developed estates, and categorized RESIDENTIAL – VILLAGE/ESTATES,
where the domestic waste collection service is available, is made at one
hundred and twenty six dollars ($126.00) per assessment, such charge to have
short title of “Domestic Waste Management – Vacant”. 6 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 501 of the Local Government Act, 1993 the annual
charge for 2009/2010 for waste service on all occupied rateable land in the
Shire, categorised Business (under Section 518 of the Local Government Act
1993) to which a waste service is provided, is made at four hundred and
thirty eight dollars ($438.00) per separate occupancy per land
parcel/assessment, such charge to have a short title of “Waste
Management — Occupied”, the amount of the annual charge
will be the amount derived by applying the formula A = B x $438.00, where “A”
equals the annual charge, “B” equals the number of separate occupancies and
$438.00 is the unit price. 7 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 502 of the Local Government Act 1993 the waste service
charge for 2009/2010 for actual use of accessing weekly waste service by non
rateable properties is made at eight dollars and forty two cents ($8.42) per
week per service per separate occupancy per land parcel/assessment, such
charge to have the short title “Waste Management —
Non Rateable”, and the amount of the charge will be the amount derived
by applying the formula A = B x C X $8.42, where “A” equals
the charge, “B” equals the number of separate occupied sites, "C"
equals the number of weekly services and $8.42 is the unit price per service
per week. 8 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 501 of the Local Government Act 1993 the annual
charge for waste for 2009/2010 on all vacant rateable land in the Shire,
categorised business (under Section 518 of the Local Government Act 1993) and
located within the confines of the towns of Nambucca Heads, Valla Beach,
Hyland Park, Macksville, Bowraville and Scotts Head and the villages of
Taylors Arm Upper, Taylors Arm Lower, Eungai Rail, Eungai Creek, Warrell
Creek and Donnellyville, is made at one hundred and twenty six dollars
($126.00) per assessment, such charge to have a short title of “Waste
Management — Vacant”. 9 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 496A & 510A of the Local Government Act 1993 the
annual charge for 2009/2010 for stormwater management services on all
rateable privately owned developed non strata residential land located within
the confines of the towns of Nambucca Heads, Valla Beach, Hyland Park,
Macksville, Bowraville and Scotts Head is made at twenty five dollars
($25.00) per land parcel/assessment, such charge to have a short title
"Stormwater Management—Residential Charge". 10 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 496A & 510A of the Local Government Act 1993 the
annual charge for 2009/2010 for stormwater management services on all
rateable privately owned developed strata residential land located within the
confines of the towns of Nambucca Heads, Valla Beach, Hyland Park, Macksville,
Bowraville and Scotts Head is made at twelve dollars and fifty cents ($12.50)
per lot/assessment, such charge to have a short title "Stormwater
Management—Residential Strata Charge". 11 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 496A & 510A of the Local Government Act 1993 the
annual charge for 2009/2010 for stormwater management services on all
rateable privately owned developed urban business land and located within the
confines of the towns of Nambucca Heads, Valla Beach, Hyland Park,
Macksville, Bowraville and Scotts Head is made at twenty five dollars
($25.00) per land parcel/assessment plus an additional twenty five dollars
($25.00) for each 350 square metres or part of 350 square metres by which the
area of the parcel of land exceeds 350 square metres, such charge to have a
short title "Stormwater Management Business Charge". 12 That it be confirmed that in
accordance with Section 496A & 510A of the Local Government Act 1993 the
annual charge for 2009/2010 for stormwater management services on all
rateable privately owned developed urban business strata lots/land and
located within the confines of the towns of Nambucca Heads, Valla Beach,
Hyland Park, Macksville, Bowraville and Scotts Head is made at an amount
equal to twenty five dollars ($25.00) per strata plan land parcel (parent
parcel) plus an additional twenty five dollars ($25.00) for each 350 square
metres or part of 350 square metres by which the area of the parcel of land
exceeds 350 square metres divisible on a pro rata basis between the strata
lots, such charge to have a short title "Stormwater Management-Business
Strata Charge". 13 That a rate of zero point three two
one six nine one cents in the dollar (0.321691¢) on the land value of all
rateable land in the rating category of “Farmland”, be now made for the year
2009/2010, subject to base amount of four hundred and forty five dollars
($445.00) per assessment, (Section 499) so that the levying of the base
amount will produce twenty nine point seven four (29.74) per cent of the
total amount payable by the levying of this ordinary rate for this category
so as to conform with Section 500 of the Local Government Act 1993 as
amended, as provided by Section 537 of the Act and determined by Section 536
of the Act, such rate to apply to all properties categorised as “Farmland”,
pursuant to Section 515 of the Local Government Act 1993 as amended, such
rate to have a separate short title of “Farmland” in accordance with Section
543 of the Act. 14 That a rate of zero point three eight
five two four four cents in the dollar (0.385244¢) on the land value of all
rateable land in the rating category “Residential” be now made for the year
2009/2010, subject to a minimum rate of six hundred and forty eight dollars
and twenty five cents ($648.25) per assessment, such rate to apply to all
properties categorised as “Residential”, pursuant to Section 516 of the Local
Government Act 1993 as amended, excluding all properties in the sub
categories “Residential-Town” and “Residential-Village/Estates”, such rate to
have a separate short title of “Residential-Rural” in accordance with Section
543 of the Act. 15 That a rate of zero point three eight
five two four four cents in the dollar (0.385244¢) on the land value of all
rateable land in the rating category “Residential”, sub category “Town” be
now made for the year 2009/2010, subject to a minimum rate of six hundred and
forty eight dollars and twenty five cents ($648.25)per assessment, such rate
to apply to all rateable land located in centres of population described as
comprising all properties zoned residential, and land not otherwise
categorised, located in the towns of Nambucca Heads, Hyland Park, Macksville,
Bowraville, Scotts Head and Valla Beach and serviced with water supply, sewerage,
or septic tank, such rate to have a separate short title of
“Residential-Town”, in accordance with Section 543 of the Act. 16 That a rate of zero point three eight
five two four four cents in the dollar (0.385244¢) on the land value of all
rateable land in the rating category “Residential”, sub-category
“Village/Estates” be now made for the year 2009/2010, subject to a minimum
rate of six hundred and forty eight dollars and twenty five cents ($648.25)
per assessment, such rate to apply to all rateable land located in the
villages of Eungai Rail, Eungai Creek, Warrell Creek, Donnellyville, Taylors
Arm – Upper and Lower, and all Estates comprising all residential land within
the rural sector with a residential building entitlement and within a
subdivision both past and present which results in the concentration of
holdings to create an estate of two or more lots, all ribbon development
residential lots along rural roads contiguous to developed estates and
villages and all ribbon development residential lots along rural roads
immediately opposite to developed estates, such rate to have a separate short
title “Residential – Village/Estates”, in accordance with Section 543 of the
Act. 17 That a rate of zero point five three
eight zero four eight cents in the dollar (0.538048¢) on the land value of
all rateable land in the rating category “Business” be now made for the year
2009/2010, subject to a minimum rate of six hundred and forty eight dollars
and twenty five cents ($648.25) per assessment, such rate to apply to all
properties categorised as “Business”,
pursuant to Section 518 of the Local Government Act 1993 as amended,
excluding all properties in the sub categories “Business-Manufactured Home
Community”, “Business-Caravan Park”, “Business-Commercial” and
“Business-Industrial”, such rate to have a separate short title of “Business”
in accordance with Section 543 of the Act. 18 That a rate of zero point five three
eight zero four eight cents in the dollar (0.538048¢) on the land value of
all rateable land in the rating category “Business”, sub category
“Manufactured Home Community”, be now made for the year 2009/2010, subject to
a minimum rate of six hundred and forty eight dollars and twenty five cents
($648.25) per assessment, such rate to apply to all rateable properties being
Assessment Number 2495/03270.4 known as “Faringdon Village” and Assessment
Number 2836/52700.8 known as “Newville Cottage Park”, such rate to have a
short title of “Business-Manufactured Home Community” (Man Home Comm) in
accordance with Section 543 of the Act. 19 That a rate of zero point nine two
six zero nine six cents in the dollar (0.926096¢) on the land value of all
rateable land in the rating category “Business”, sub category “Caravan Park”,
be now made for the year 2009/2010, subject to a minimum rate of six hundred
and forty eight dollars and twenty five cents ($648.25) per assessment, such
rate to apply to the rateable properties being Assessment Numbers:
such rate to have a short title of “ 20 That a rate of zero point eight six
six six six three cents in the dollar (0.866663¢) on the land value of all
rateable land in the rating category “Business”, sub category “CBD” be now
made for the year 2009/2010, subject to a minimum rate of six hundred and
forty eight dollars and twenty five cents ($648.25) per assessment, such rate
to apply to all rateable properties categorised as “Business”, sub category
“CBD” in the towns of Nambucca Heads, Bowraville, Macksville, Valla Beach,
Scotts Head and such rate to have a separate short title of “Business-CBD” in
accordance with Section 543 of the Act. 21 That a rate of zero point five three
eight zero four eight cents (0.538048¢) in the dollar on the land value of
all rateable land in the rating category “Business”, sub category “Industrial
Estate” be now made for the year 2009/2010, subject to a minimum rate of six
hundred and forty eight dollars and twenty five cents ($648.25) per
assessment, such rate to apply to all rateable properties categorised as
“Business”, sub category “Industrial Estate” in the towns of Nambucca Heads,
Macksville, and such rate to have a separate short title of
“Business-Industrial Estate” in accordance with Section 543 of the Act. 22 That a special rate of zero point zero
one zero seven one five cents (0.010715¢) in the dollar on the land value of
all rateable land in Council’s area (Section 538) be now made for the year
2009/2010, subject to a base amount of seventeen dollars ($17.00) per
assessment (Section 499) so that the levying of the base amount will produce
forty nine point seven (49.7) per cent of the total amount payable by the
levying of the special rate so as to conform with Section 500 of the Local
Government Act 1993 as amended, as provided by Section 537 of the Act and
determined by Section 536 of the Act.
Such special rate to have a separate short title of “Environmental” in
accordance with Section 543 of the Act. 23 That a rate of seventy eight dollars
($78.00) be the annual fee for Category 1 (Low Risk) Sewer Trade Waste now be
made for the year 2009/2010. 24 That a rate of seventy eight dollars
($78.00) be the annual fee for Category 1A (Low Risk) Sewer Trade Waste now
be made for the year 2009/2010. 25 That a rate of one hundred and thirty
dollars ($130.00) be the annual fee for Category 2 (Medium Risk) Sewer Trade
Waste with one dollar and forty eight cents ($1.48) for the Usage Charge per
kilolitre be now made for the 2009/2010. 26 That a rate of one hundred and thirty
dollars ($130.00) be the annual fee for Category 3 (High Risk) Sewer Trade
Waste with a one dollar per kilogram for Excess Mass Charge now be made for
the year 2009/2010. 27 That a rate of seventy eight dollars
($78.00) be the annual fee for Category 4 Septic tank Effluent Disposal Sewer
Trade Waste now be made for the year 2009/2010. 28 That a rate of seventy eight dollars
($78.00) be the annual fee for Category 4 Caravan Dump Effluent Disposal with
a charge of one hundred and fourteen dollars ($114.00) for Disposal at
Treatment Works with a maximum of 2,500L Disposals over 2,500L will have an
additional charge of forty one dollars ($41.00) per 1000L. |
DISCUSSION:
The office for the Minister for Local Government has advised that the Minister has approved Council's rating variation application. The Minister's instrument formally approving this variation is now at hand.
The Minister has approved an overall increase in general income of 4.67%. In addition to the approved rate pegging increase of 3.5% the Minister has approved a special increase of 1.12. Council's minimum rate has also been increase to $648.25. The increase is made up of the following components:
% |
Description |
-0.03 |
Excess Adjustment |
-0.02 |
Valuation Objections |
0.10 |
Income Adjustment for Farmland Rates written off in excess of 20% greater than the prior year levy |
3.50 |
2009/2010 General Variation |
1.12 |
Special Variation |
4.67 |
Total Variation |
CONSULTATION:
Rates Officer
Department of Local Government
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
This report has no environmental impact.
Social
This report has no social impact.
Economic
There is no economic impact.
Risk
There is no risk to Council.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Council’s adopted 2009/10 budget included the special rate variation increase, therefore there are no additional financial implications to the adopted budget.
There are no attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.1 SF1148 160709 Contract Regulatory Officer's Report - June 2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Phillip Gall, Manager Health and Building
Summary: The following is the Contract Regulatory
Officer’s Report for June 2009. |
That the report
from the Contract Regulatory Officer for June 2009 be received and noted by
Council. |
Dogs |
Total |
Total |
Seized |
|
13 |
Returned to
Owner |
3 |
|
Impounded |
10 |
|
Total Seized |
13 |
13 |
Breakdown |
Total |
Total |
Seized |
|
13 |
From Previous
Month |
|
12 |
Stolen Dog
Recovered |
|
0 |
Released to
Owner |
1 |
|
Returned to
Owner |
3 |
|
Euthanized |
12 |
|
Currently in
Pound |
8 |
|
Sold |
1 |
|
Stolen from
Pound |
0 |
|
Total in Pound |
25 |
25 |
Dumped |
0 |
|
Surrendered |
1 |
|
Cats |
Total |
Total |
Seized |
|
18 |
Returned to
Owner |
0 |
|
Impounded |
18 |
|
Total Seized |
18 |
18 |
Breakdown |
Total |
Total |
Seized |
|
18 |
From Previous
Month |
|
0 |
Released to
Owner |
0 |
|
Returned to
Owner |
0 |
|
Euthanized |
18 |
|
Currently in
Pound |
0 |
|
Sold |
0 |
|
Escaped from
Pound |
0 |
|
Total in Pound |
18 |
18 |
Dumped |
0 |
|
Surrendered |
4 |
|
Kilometres travelled |
3180 |
Cattle |
Breakdown |
Total |
Seized |
|
1 |
Returned to
Owner |
1 |
|
Impounded |
0 |
|
Total Seized |
1 |
1 |
CSR’s (Customer
Service Requests) Actioned – Not including Merit |
48 |
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
Director Environment &
Planning's Report
ITEM 10.2 SF1261 160709 Outstanding DA's >12 months, applications where
submissions received & not determined 4 July 2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Barbara Sadler,
Executive Assistant
Summary: In accordance with Council resolution from
15 May 2008 meeting, the development applications listed below are in excess
of 12 months old (Table 1). Table 2 are development applications which
have been received but not yet determined due to submissions received. In
accordance with Minute 848/08 from Council meeting of 18 December 2008,
should any Councillor wish to “call in” an application a Notice of Motion is
required specifying the reasons why it is to be “called in”. If an application is not called in and
staff consider the matters raised by the submissions have been adequately
addressed then the application will be processed under delegated authority.
Where refusal is recommended the application may be reported to
Council for determination. |
1 That the list of outstanding
development applications (at least 12 months old) and applications received,
be noted and received for information by Council. 2 That the applications where
submissions have been received be noted and received for information by
Council. |
OPTIONS:
TABLE 1: UNRESOLVED
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IN EXCESS OF 12 MONTHS OLD
DA
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
SUBMISSIONS
RECEIVED/STAFF COMMENTS |
2008/269 |
30/06/08 |
Deck, Garage & Alterations |
|
18/07/08 letter to
applicant requesting fees for advertising. 21/07/08 Fees received. 22/07/08
Adjoining owners notified & newspaper advertising, expire 8/08/08 -
7/8/08 Objection received - Grace - Report to Council 20/11/08 Council
deferred this matter as its 15/01/09 meeting. 2/7/09 Deferred
for 4 weeks at the request of the applicant |
TOTAL
APPLICATIONS OUTSTANDING 12 MONTHS OR MORE:
1
TABLE 2: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS WHERE
SUBMISSIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND ARE NOT YET DETERMINED
DA
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
SUBMISSIONS
RECEIVED/STAFF COMMENTS |
2009/087 |
05/01/2009 |
67 |
Lot 3 DP 241032, Lots 1 & 5 DP 248870 & Lots 1 & 2 DP
377306, |
§ Request for pedestrian and
buggy access to remain 16/01/09 Letter
sent to applicant re addition information re noise, bus services, Aboriginal
Cultural Heritage, pedestrian and cycleway networks 18/03/09 Noise
report submitted Application being assessed. 27/04/09
Department of Lands have advised that they don’t support use of the TSR –
subdivision layout may need to be amended – discussions ongoing between
Department of Lands, Council and the applicant. Council has advised the
applicant to submit an amended plan – applicant has agreed & amended plan
being prepared. |
2009/128 |
25/02/2009 |
2 |
Lot 10 DP 1033603, |
§ Issues with the
removal of native bushland, placement of building envelope and rainwater run
off § Access is a
high hazard floodway § 7B Wetlands
vulnerability to be considered § Believes has
area of threatened species § An established
WIRES Wallaby rehabilitation and release program area could be jeopardised § Concerns re bushfire hazard protection and
dwelling envelopes 01/04/09 Application referred to Department of
Natural Resources for undertaking of creek crossing 21/04/09 NSW RFS not prepared to issue 100B
approval 27/04/09 Amended plans and Bushfire Report 18/06/09 Council resolution for applicant to be
given opportunity to relocate building envelope to reduce clearing impacts – 23/06/09 - 30 day letter sent 1/07/09 – Amended subdivision plans received Currently being assessed |
DA
NO |
DATE
OF RECEIPT |
PROPOSAL |
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION |
SUBMISSIONS
RECEIVED/STAFF COMMENTS |
2009/143 |
18/3/2009 |
2 |
Lot 1 DP 417248, |
§ Concerns with
stormwater system, removal of rocky outgrowths for road widening, speed
limit, dogs and entry to beach § Support
application but would like ROW marked on the plans and restriction of fill Submissions
being reviewed. 22/04/09
Applicant requested to submit Coastal Hazard Assessment. 05/05/09
Written request from Applicant that Council await preliminary data from SMEC
to use in its assessment of Sea Level Rise & Coastal Hazard Impacts. SMEC
data due by end of May. Assessment
will recommence on receipt of data. |
2003/028/01 Modification |
12/05/09 |
Dwelling-House |
Lot 851 DP 1038800, |
§ Construction
materials – roofing (zincalume) & reflection issues § Siting of water
tanks § Solar panels
(not shown on original plans) § Non-compliance
with original consent condition (vegetation buffer) 1/7/09 - Site inspection
carried out and owner advised of requirement to change the roofing colour and
amended plans to be submitted showing solar panels Application to be dealt
with by late-July |
There are no attachments for this report.
16 July
2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.3 SF1261 160709 DEP Applications and Statistical Reports July 2008-June 2009,
2002-2009 and Certificates Received 2004-2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Barbara Sadler, Executive Assistant
Summary: Environment
and Planning Department Development Application statistics for the financial
year 2008-2009 compared with 2007-2008 and Certificate Applications received
and determined, are provided in the body of the report. |
1 That Council note development
application statistics and processing times for July 2008-June 2009 compared
with July 2007-June 2008. 2 That Council note development
application statistics and processing times for the years 2002 to 2009. 3 That Council note the statistical
breakdown of development applications thus far for the financial year
1 July 2008-30 June 2009. 4 That Council note the statistical
information for Certificates received by Council for 2004-2009. |
Development Application Statistics
The figures show a 29.18% decrease in the number of DA’s received for July 2008-June
2009 with construction costs decreasing
by 10.95% compared to the same
period in 2007/2008. The total number of DA’s/CD’s approved for the month of June
was 12 plus 3 modification.
DA’S AND COMPLYING DEVELOPMENT
|
Construction
Costs |
No Applications
Received |
Applications
Approved (DA & CD) |
$54,799,241 |
301 |
301 |
|
July 2008-June 2009 |
$49,393,046 |
233 |
209 |
FINANCIAL:
Direct and indirect impact on
current and future budgets
The above comparisons will be considered in the next
quarterly budget review to identify what impact the development application
numbers will have on our projected income.
Source of fund and any variance to
working funds
An average income is estimated at the start of each
budget year and is reviewed at each quarterly review.
TURNAROUND TIMES FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 2009 |
|||||
Month |
Mean Time |
Median |
#Average age of DA’s (Days) |
||
Average |
Highest |
Lowest |
|||
January |
41.75 |
40 |
51 |
83 |
32 |
February |
90.00 |
54 |
165.1 |
575 |
17 |
March |
36.27 |
33 |
51.70 |
140 |
3 |
April |
34.59 |
21 |
53.23 |
153 |
2 |
May |
62.94 |
36 |
72.72 |
307 |
12 |
June |
45.60 |
35 |
85.36 |
939 |
12 |
#Average age of DA’s
The average age of all DA’s for
the month is derived from the total number of days from when the applications
were lodged with Council until determined. This average is provided for
information as many applications required additional information by Council
and/or other Government Agencies to enable them to be processed (ie Stop Clock
applied).
COMPLYING DEVELOPMENTS RECEIVED
YEAR |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Total
|
2007 Private Cert |
5 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
42 |
2007 Council |
0 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
33 |
2008 Private Cert |
0 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
44 |
2008 Council |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
1 |
3 |
33 |
2009 Private Cert |
3 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
2009 Council |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
CONVEYANCING CERTIFICATES ISSUED
YTD (June) |
Drainage Diagrams |
Section 149 Certs |
Outstanding Notices |
2004 |
170 |
449 |
123 |
2005 |
133 |
385 |
78 |
2006 |
135 |
352 |
109 |
2007 |
139 |
422 |
104 |
2008 |
151 |
359 |
100 |
2009 |
121 |
405 |
88 |
OCCUPATION CERTIFICATES RELEASED
YEAR |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
TOTAL |
Average/ |
2002 |
20 |
3 |
7 |
8 |
15 |
7 |
13 |
13 |
16 |
13 |
13 |
14 |
142 |
11.80 |
2003 |
18 |
7 |
7 |
14 |
24 |
19 |
18 |
10 |
17 |
17 |
21 |
19 |
191 |
15.90 |
2004 |
11 |
15 |
17 |
20 |
18 |
20 |
20 |
17 |
16 |
23 |
26 |
30 |
233 |
19.41 |
2005 |
10 |
28 |
29 |
18 |
26 |
12 |
14 |
28 |
26 |
24 |
19 |
18 |
252 |
21.00 |
2006 |
26 |
26 |
12 |
20 |
27 |
24 |
20 |
18 |
25 |
23 |
10 |
15 |
246 |
20.50 |
Private |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
9 |
5 |
40 |
3.33 |
Council |
6 |
20 |
14 |
7 |
22 |
13 |
12 |
10 |
14 |
13 |
8 |
12 |
151 |
12.58 |
Private |
4 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
11 |
4 |
7 |
61 |
5.08 |
Council |
12 |
16 |
9 |
9 |
29 |
12 |
19 |
25 |
16 |
20 |
17 |
13 |
197 |
16.41 |
Private |
1 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
3.00 |
Council |
21 |
11 |
19 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
15.66 |
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.4 SF81 160709 Report on Joint Bushfire Management Committee Meeting
held 10 June 2009
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Grant Nelson, Strategic Planner
Summary: The purpose of this report is to inform Council on the matters considered at the Joint Bushfire Management Committee Meeting undertaken on the 10 June 2009. Specifically this report is to inform Council of the proposed amalgamation of the Nambucca and Kempsey Bushfire Management Committees to form the Lower North Coast Bushfire Management Committee. |
That the report on the meeting of the Joint Bushfire
Management Committee held 10 June 2009, be noted. |
OPTIONS:
There are no options.
DISCUSSION:
Deputy Mayor Councillor John Ainsworth and
Council’s Strategic Planner Grant Nelson, the nominated Council representatives
on the Nambucca Bushfire Management Committee, attended a joint meeting between
the Nambucca and Kempsey Bushfire Management Committees on the 10th
June 2009.
The key purpose of the joint meeting was to address
a motion relating to the amalgamation of the Kempsey and Nambucca Committees to
create the Lower North Coast Bushfire Management Committee.
A motion was put forward to amalgamate the two (2)
committees for the following key reasons:
· Inter
LGA consistency and communication;
· Minimising
meetings and duplication for key government representatives;
· Maximise
use of resources between the two (2) committees;
· Consistent
approach with the amalgamation of other Bushfire Management Committees
throughout NSW; and
· Streamlining
the existing process.
The discussion which followed this motion examined
both advantages and disadvantages of the amalgamation. The advantages
reflecting those items discussed above, and the disadvantages raised being
summarised below:
· Certain
organisations such NSW Police, and the Nature Conservation Council will only be
able to have one voting representative. Where two (2) representatives are now
available – one for each LGA, the amalgamation will require their vote to be
shared.
· Funding
for various projects will be required to be shared through a larger area –
however this should not result in a decrease in the available funding.
· Travel
times for committee members will be increased when the committee meeting is
held in the adjacent shire.
After the advantages and disadvantages of the
amalgamation had been discussed at length, the majority consensus (16) voted
for the motion to amalgamate. A minority (2) voted against.
The committee chair will now prepare a report for
the Bushfire Coordinating Committee in order to assess the proposal to
amalgamate the two (2) Committees. The Bushfire Coordinating Committee must
give approval to the amalgamation before it can formally proceed.
CONSULTATION:
Nil.
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Environment
There is unlikely to be any detrimental
environmental impacts to the Nambucca Shire based on the amalgamation of the 2
committees.
Social
There is unlikely to be any detrimental social
impacts to the Nambucca Shire based on the amalgamation of the 2 committees.
Economic
There is unlikely to be any detrimental
economic impacts to the Nambucca Shire based on the amalgamation of the 2
committees.
Risk
Nil.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct and indirect impact on
current and future budgets
Nil.
Source of fund and any variance to
working funds
Nil.
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.5 SF42 160709 Report on Department Of Local Government Circular
08-61 - Plumbing Inspections By Council
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Phillip Gall, Manager Health and Building
Summary: Council dealt with a report in relation to the circular on 20 November 2008 and resolved in the following manner: 1 That Council make urgent representations to the Department
of Local Government and the Local Government & Shires Association to
lobby to have the NSW Plumbing & Drainage Code of Practice (2006) amended
to remove reference to the qualifications required to undertake plumbing and
drainage inspections. 2 That in the meantime Council maintain the status quo with
its current inspection regimes and responsible officers. 3 That the matter be brought back to Council in three (3)
months, or sooner if further advice is received. This matter has lead to staff being referred to a number of Government Departments in an attempt to seek clarification in relation to whether Council’s Health and Building Surveyors are required to hold a Plumbers Licence to enable them to undertake inspections of work on private lands undertaken by Licensed plumbers for sewer, plumbing and drainage works associated with Council’s sewerage systems and any on-site sewerage management systems. |
That the information be noted with no further action
be taken in relation to the Department of Local Government Circular 08-61. |
OPTIONS:
It is considered that following the advice from the Office of Fair Trading and Commerce there are no other worthwhile options. This will need to be reviewed following the final report in regard to water and sewer utilities.
DISCUSSION:
Council's request for clarification in regard to qualifications required to under taker sewer inspections from the Department of Local Government lead to a referral to the Department of Water & Energy.
Discussions with representative from the Department of Water & Energy indicated the requirements for Inspectors of plumbing works to be licensed came from within the Home Building Act 1989.
Further inquiries to the Office of Fair Trading & Commerce who administer the Home Building Act were made, with a response being received on the 23 June 2009, (see copy of email reprinted at the end of the report).
After speaking with representatives of the various Departments it now appears that Council’s who are the responsible water and/or sewerage Authority have the right to authorises appropriate persons under the Local Government Act 1993 to carry out such inspections on Council’s behalf.
Council’s Health & Building Surveyors have the required delegations to carry out such inspection works whilst ever Council remains the appropriate Authority.
Discussions with representatives from other Local Government Authorities within rural areas of the state have indicated that the majority have made no changes to their mode of operations in relation to who carries out plumbing inspections within their councils. What is interesting is that due to the significant shortage of qualified Health and Building Surveyors some rural and regional Council's have employed Licensed plumbers to pick up this aspect of their operations.
Whilst some of the larger specialised water & sewerage supply authorities have also engaged specialised plumbing inspectors.
CONSULTATION:
Department of Local Government
Department of Water & Energy
Office of Fair Trading
Other Local
Government Authorities including Ballina, Lismore,
SUSTAINABILITY
ASSESSMENT:
Environment
No impact on the environment as this matter is an operational matter.
Social
No impact.
Economic
No economic impact.
Risk
There is not expected to be any risk as the appropriate delegations have been provided by Council to the General Manager and onto the staff carrying out the works under section 378(2) of the Local Government Act 1993.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Direct and indirect impact on
current and future budgets
There is not expected to be any impact on
current and future budgets as the status quo remains. Any future changes to the
creation of regional water & sewerage authorities or alliances between local
authorities may see the inspection function transfer to any new authorities,
but this would be subject these new authorities or alliances being established
through any change in legislation adopted by the State government in the
future.
Source of fund and any variance to
working funds
Funds for these operations of Council are covered by section 68 application fees, under the Local Government Act 1993.
Copy of Email from Commissioner for Fair
Trading
Dear Mr Gall
Sorry about the late reply to your enquiry (I have
been on leave).
You have enquired to the Office of Fair Trading
whether a plumbing licence is required to supervise plumbing inspection.
The Home Building Act 1989 does not specifically
mention inspections in the legislation.
Under the Act, a licence in the class of ‘Plumber’ or
Water Plumber is required to carry out any water plumbing work.
Water plumbing work is defined under the Act as work
of water supply as defined in AS/NZS 3500.0:2003, Plumbing and drainage,
including such work on pipes and fittings, whether or not connected or intended
to be connected to a water main, that are in a building in which any part of
the sewerage service is connected to a septic tank, effluent system or sullage
system.
The work of water supply as defined in AS/NZS
3500.0:2003 is the construction, alteration, extension, disconnection,
maintenance, repair, renewal or cleaning of any pipes or fittings of any water
service connecting or intended to connect directly or indirectly with any water
main of an authority.
If the method used to inspect the plumbing falls
within the above definition, the tradesperson carrying out the inspection
requires a licence in the class of ‘Plumber’ or Water Plumber under the Home
Building Act 1989.
However, there is other NSW legislation that regulates
the plumbing industry.
Those Acts are:
· Sydney
Water Act 1994
· Hunter
Water Act 1991
· Local
Government Act 1993
· Water
Management Act 2000
If your plumbing inspections fall under the
jurisdiction of one of the above Acts, you would need to comply with their
requirements as well.
Regards
Tony Travers
A/Co-ordinator
Information Communication Unit
For Commissioner for Fair Trading
Phone: 02 9895 9995
There are no
attachments for this report.
16
July 2009 |
Director Environment & Planning's Report
ITEM 10.6 SF1372 160709 Report on Successful Funding Application - Local Adaptation Pathways
Program
AUTHOR/ENQUIRIES: Grant Nelson, Strategic Planner
Summary: Reporting to Council that a joint grant
application prepared by Nambucca, Bellingen and Kempsey Shire Councils was
successful in attracting $140,000 to develop local strategies for climate
change adaptation and risk management in each of the three Shires. To complement this, a draft brief to
undertake the project has been prepared for Council endorsement. |
1 That Council note
the grant application was successful and the intention to commence work on
the project once all formal contracts have been signed. 2 That Council
release a media statement advising the community of the successful grant
application and project. 3 That Council
endorse the draft Brief. |